• The Ramaphosa Plan

    The president said on Friday that the work "starts now". He wasn't wrong, writes Pieter du Toit.

  • Stimulus recap

    Seven key points in the president's package of economic reforms and spending plans.

  • Supporting role

    Meet the members of President Cyril Ramaphosa's new 10-person advisory panel on land reform.

Loading...

New era for healthcare as Motsoaledi wants co-payments abolished

Jun 21 2018 14:54
Lameez Omarjee

Health Minister Aaron Motsoaledi has pointed to the gross inequality that exists between public and private healthcare services, while admitting to government inaction PHOTO: THAPELO MAPHAKELA

Related Articles

8 things you need to know about the National Health Insurance bills

Funding issue still the biggest stumbling block to NHI – legal expert

Bringing quality healthcare to the world

Did NHI receive enough funds to keep going?

Government sticking to NHI with extra R4.2bn

NHI could go same route as e-tolls, Davis Tax Committee warns

 

The abolishment of co-payments is one of the proposals of the Medical Schemes Amendment bill, announced by Health Minister Aaron Motsoaledi.

Motsoaledi was speaking at a briefing on the medical schemes amendment bill and National Health Insurance bill in Pretoria on Thursday.

The NHI bill was gazetted earlier on Thursday. Motsoaledi explained that the medical schemes bill was amended to align with the NHI white paper and NHI bill which seeks to achieve universal healthcare.

According to the health department’s definition, NHI is a health financing system that pools funds to provide access to quality health services for all South Africans based on their health needs and irrespective of their socio-economic status.

While NHI is phased in, beneficiaries of medical schemes need “immediate relief from serious challenges” they’re experiencing in the current medical scheme regime. “The nature and magnitude of the challenges is that it will be undesirable for medical scheme beneficiaries to have to wait for long term changes,” said Motsoaledi.

The amendment will also ensure a “smooth, harmonius transition” that does not disrupt access to healthcare during the implementation of NHI.

Motsoaledi explained that only 10% of South Africans can afford private healthcare, according to the World Health Organisation and the Organisation for Economic and Social Development, and it is important to ease the financial burden on South Africans.

Based on the proposed amendments to the Medical Schemes Amendment bill - which are open for the public to comment on for the next three months - co-payments will be abolished. This means that “every cent charged” to the patient must be settled in full by the medical scheme. The patient will not have the burden to pay.

Motsoaledi said that this amendment was “well thought of” and is justified by the number of public complaints received by the Department of Health and the Council for Medical Schemes.

According to the department's data medical schemes hold close to R60bn in reserves which are not being used. There is a statutory requirement that 25% of income be held in reserve to cater for emergencies, but R60bn is equivalent to 33% of reserves. Motsoaledi said this is an unnecessary accumulation at the expense of patients.

“These huge reserves were accumulated partly through high premiums but also by introducing the co-payments such that medical schemes avoid having to pay or even dip into the reserves if the situation demands,” he said. The council is also reviewing the statutory requirement, as it is better to release the money for patients than for it to be held in reserves.

The amendments also propose the abolishment of brokers. “Almost two thirds of principal members of medical aid schemes pay monthly to a broker as part of their premium. Many of these members do not even know that they are paying this money which in 2018 is R90 per month,” Motsoaledi said. The total amount paid to brokers in 2017 was R2.2bn.  

“We want this money to be made available to pay for direct health expenses of members rather than serving brokers who are actually not needed in the healthcare system.”

Motsoaledi claimed that the work done by brokers is actually done by the Council of Medical Schemes.

Among the other amendments which will affect consumer pockets include the introduction of an income cross-subsidisation model.

“The rich must subsidise the poor, the young must subsidise the old and the healthy must subsidise the sick,” said Motsoaledi. Currently the opposite is happening.

Medical aid schemes will also pass back savings if a member uses a designated service provider, according to the rules of the scheme. Currently these savings are taken over by the scheme or the administrator as opposed to being passed on to members through a premium reduction.

Another amendment will deal with cancellations and waiting periods between joining a scheme and accessing benefits. “Under NHI there will be no penalty related to late joining or age. This is further to protect the interest of living spouses after the passing of the principal member or after retirement prior to payment of their benefits,” he explained.

The bill also addresses governance of medical schemes and proposes a minimum educational requirement and expertise to a member of a board of trustees or a CEO of a medical aid scheme.

NHI fund

The NHI bill seeks to establish the NHI Fund, a single public purchaser and financier of health services for the country. It is a mandatory prepayment health services system, the bill read. During his address Motsoaledi said that all South Africans would have to ascribe to it as they do to the Constitution. 

The fund will pool revenue to protect users against financial risk and ensure the sustainability of the funding of healthcare services.

It will also provide for “equity and efficiency in funding” by purchasing healthcare services, medicines, health goods and health related products from certified, accredited and contracted service, the bill read.

Motsoaledi said that the sources of funding for NHI are to be determined by the Department of Health and Treasury. "This is a question that I am asked all the time," said Motsoaledi. He said it is the job of Treasury and Cabinet to look for the funding, and not the minister.

"I did not come up with NHI, it is the ruling party that did so and passed the resolution at the conference in Polokwane in 2007," he said.

"It is the function of the government of the country to sit down and see where the money will come from."

In the National Budget Treasury had allocated R4.1bn to NHI for the medium term.

* Sign up to Fin24's top news in your inbox: SUBSCRIBE TO FIN24 NEWSLETTER

Follow Fin24 on Twitter, Facebook, Google+ and Pinterest. 24.com encourages commentary submitted via MyNews24. Contributions of 200 words or more will be considered for publication.

aaron motsoaledi  |  nhi  |  medical schemes
NEXT ON FIN24X

 
 
 
 

Company Snapshot

Money Clinic

Money Clinic
Do you have a question about your finances? We'll get an expert opinion.
Click here...

Voting Booth

What do you think of President Cyril Ramaphosa's economic stimulus plan?

Previous results · Suggest a vote

Loading...