Share

Why Davos dislikes digital currencies

GENERALLY, one of the things politicians have to get right if they want to stay comfortably in power is to make sure that they avoid a currency collapse. Just ask politicians in Zimbabwe and Venezuela if they sleep easy at night, or Theresa May and her Brexit team whether the path the British pound has taken over the past year gives them any comfort.

Here at Davos 2017, for all Mr Xi Jinping’s laudable rhetoric about commitment to globalisation the one thing China felt uncomfortable about was the renewed and sudden weakness in the Chinese yuan towards the end of 2016. Out came the new capital controls, and the yuan has promptly strengthened over 2% since.

On the other end of the spectrum, we had Donald Trump and his assistants recently talking down the US dollar, warning of the dangers of a currency which is too strong. Many now believe that we are on the brink of some sort of global currency war, as many countries which experience stresses in their growth path gravitate towards some sort of export-led recovery on the back of a weaker currency.

In South Africa, we know all too well though that a weak currency doesn’t always lead to an improving growth rate. 

Complicating matters entirely, global central banks trying hard to guide their currencies to some perceived optimal level are now faced with a new threat to their currency management plans: digital currencies, which exist outside the usual capital controls central banks are able to enact.

JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon famously said at Davos 2016:

“No government will ever support a virtual currency that goes around borders and doesn't have the same controls. It's not going to happen."  

Well, Bitcoin dropped over 17% against the USD after that in the space of over a month, so maybe he had some influence and insights? Hold your horses… just checked the price of Bitcoin again, one year later - it’s up 96%. Hmmm...

This year, at Davos 2017, Nobel laureate Joseph Stiglitz, one of the few economists who truly understand the prime issue of global inequality and the power of capital flows, has put it plainly: 

I believe very strongly that countries like the United States could and should move to a digital currency, so that you would have the ability to trace [this kind of] corruption. There are important issues of privacy, cyber-security, but it would certainly have big advantages.

Critics of digital currencies have pointed out that the lack of control over such currencies means they are open to being used for nefarious purposes. But then just ask Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi why he removed 86% of his country’s currency from circulation in a November 2016 surprise announcement. The reason? To tackle corruption, curb tax evasion, and shut down the shadow economy – the very things that digital currency critics point to.

Digital currencies the way of the future

Certainly, when one of the key benefits of a digital currency is the ability to do faster and much cheaper bank transfers – in essence by cutting out the middleman (who usually happen to be banks themselves) – it becomes obvious why banks, among others, are threatened by digital currencies. Given the technologies available, international bank transfers are archaic. Digital currencies (and the blockchain technology behind it) are the way of the future.

In Africa, we have seen the success of mobile technology in promoting commerce. It’s estimated for example that roughly 60% of Kenyan commerce takes place via M-Pesa, which is a form of mobile phone credits as a form of exchange. It works well – until you want to cash in your credits, after which fees - like with banks - are very high.

Again, digital currencies can be shown to provide a safe and cheap medium of exchange for the poor. In this way, digital currencies could help to expand access to financial markets, allowing even the unbanked a means of saving and transacting, at low cost. 

The biggest obstacle perhaps then is that it seems the status quo suits the very 1% who are debating the topic at Davos on behalf of the 99% who need the solutions.  

* Arno Lawrenz is head of Fixed Income Portfolio Management at Ashburton Investments. Opinions expressed are his own.


We live in a world where facts and fiction get blurred
Who we choose to trust can have a profound impact on our lives. Join thousands of devoted South Africans who look to News24 to bring them news they can trust every day. As we celebrate 25 years, become a News24 subscriber as we strive to keep you informed, inspired and empowered.
Join News24 today
heading
description
username
Show Comments ()
Rand - Dollar
18.89
+0.2%
Rand - Pound
23.82
+0.4%
Rand - Euro
20.37
+0.3%
Rand - Aus dollar
12.30
+0.3%
Rand - Yen
0.12
+0.2%
Platinum
908.05
0.0%
Palladium
1,014.94
0.0%
Gold
2,232.75
-0.0%
Silver
24.95
-0.1%
Brent Crude
87.00
+1.8%
Top 40
68,346
0.0%
All Share
74,536
0.0%
Resource 10
57,251
0.0%
Industrial 25
103,936
0.0%
Financial 15
16,502
0.0%
All JSE data delayed by at least 15 minutes Iress logo
Company Snapshot
Editorial feedback and complaints

Contact the public editor with feedback for our journalists, complaints, queries or suggestions about articles on News24.

LEARN MORE
Government tenders

Find public sector tender opportunities in South Africa here.

Government tenders
This portal provides access to information on all tenders made by all public sector organisations in all spheres of government.
Browse tenders