South Africa’s stark choice: Patronage or pragmatism | Fin24
  • Solly Moeng

    Give business owners a reason to stay in South Africa.

  • Pravin Gordhan

    The minister says SA is paying more for electricity because of theft at Medupi and Kusile.

  • Keep Flying the Flag

    The ANC says the state must keep a 'restructured' SAA as a national airline.


South Africa’s stark choice: Patronage or pragmatism

Jun 19 2017 06:02
Daniel Silke

Patronage or pragmatism is now a fundamental point of schism, as SA debates new policy directions that will bring inclusive growth and radically positive changes to growth, writes Daniel Silke.

SOUTH Africa’s political economy is experiencing nuanced yet substantial shifts almost on a weekly basis. Three core issues – the hapless governance of the country’s state-owned enterprises, the application and implementation of policy and the ongoing#GuptaLeaks controversies - are now beginning to add to the existing divisions within the governing ANC.

Whereas only a few months ago, the ANC’s looming consultative conference largely revolved around personality, today these three elements are fast becoming an entrenched aspect of the crucial December elective programme.

For sure, multiple factions exist within the ANC. The party formations inter alia the ANC Women's League, Youth League, MK vets, Premier League, KZN faction et al all have an agenda of their own – usually coalescing around a particular personality. But, as South Africa faces a crisis of confidence in so many aspects of its body politic, a debate beyond personality is emerging.

Over the past few weeks we have seen how in the case of Eskom, the executive (Lynne Brown) is now being policed by an increasingly emboldened section of the ANC. Her embarrassing flip-flop on Ben Ngubane was summarily dismissed by the broader party leadership heralding an important break within the party over executive authority.

And Nugubane’s eventual exit, triggered as it was by the ANC, reflects the creeping power of the party over elements within its top leadership and ministerial cadre. Despite President Jacob Zuma’s dismissal of Pravin Gordhan and Mcebisi Jonas, the party has been in something of a fight-back mode.

Zuma’s authority to reshuffle his Cabinet has shown his technical power. But in the trenches, it’s becoming tougher for those ministers seen as close to the president to exercise their authority.

This trend has been further exacerbated by the release by Mineral Resources Minister Mosebenzi Zwane’s Mining Charter which reportedly has also caused consternation within the ANC – at least within the party’s economic transformation cluster. Both Zwane and Brown are seen as close to Zuma and have also been directly or indirectly muddied by the #GuptaLeaks scandal.

To this we could also add the dismissal of Hlaudi Motsoeneng and the appointment of a new interim SABC board, which is already reversing some of the damaging policy changes at Auckland Park that have largely contributed to the half-a-billion rand loss in only the fourth quarter of last year. Next in line will surely be South African Airways and its drain on the fiscus.

There is therefore a two-track power struggle emerging: those that wish to either perpetuate the patronage-based politics of the present or just see little wrong with the present state of affairs, and those looking to reboot towards a more transparent and accountable system of governance.

No place to hide for Zuma and Cabinet

Increasingly, there is no place to hide for Zuma and his current Cabinet, who largely are ultimately accountable for the sorry state of graft, corruption and mismanagement. But, with accountability now largely delayed pending a series of potentially lengthy investigations, it will be left to a group of internal insurgents within the ANC to restore a semblance of trustworthiness and honesty in government.

South Africa looks as though it is ruled by two factions within the same political party: the president and his Cabinet - largely oblivious to the extreme economic damage being exacted on an almost daily basis – and an internal wing battling to right the ship.

In speech after speech, Deputy President Cyril Ramaphosa laments the current state of the party, its leadership and even its policy effectiveness. In a typically oblique manner – largely as a result of him being the sitting deputy president and candidate for the Zuma’s job - Ramaphosa is steadily adding to a charge sheet of government neglect and negligence. It is a careful strategy that fully acknowledges the depressed state of the nation and calls for renewal.

For Nkosazana Dlamini-Zuma, there is largely silence on the broader issues of a breakdown in governance and credibility. Her campaign increasingly looks as though it simply endorses the status quo and she may find that unless she too becomes more adept at subtle critiques of the Zuma era, she will largely be labelled as the candidate of brand Zuma and its continuity.

These two big-picture factions are now in a state of battle. Patronage versus pragmatic politics is the new game in town until the end of the year. The pragmatists are attempting to steer public opinion through Pravin Gordhan’s calls to mobilise. The patronage faction just goes about its business as if little is wrong.

Economy caught in the middle

South Africa’s economy is therefore caught in the middle. It will simply become impossible for the state to manage its own failing cash cows like SAA and Eskom under the current status quo. It will be almost impossible to reduce the growing differential between government revenue and expenditure so critical to spend on capital intensive and growth-orientated infrastructure and social projects.

Framing the next six months in a battle between these two forces is becoming clearer. And all politicians will be forced to take sides. Internal awakenings within the ANC are now beginning to stir and hold executive members to some sort of account.

Patronage or pragmatism is now a fundamental point of schism. With patronage now seen to be costing the country billions of rands, even policy formulation might need be to be tweaked. When the state has become so incapacitated in its ability to manage its own affairs, a small but significant drift to a more market-friendly economic outlook might just be on the cards.

Pragmatism in economic doctrine is as critical as a desire to return the country to good governance and restore the brand of the ANC. And those who in the past have been stymied by their own ideological myopia may be forced to bite the bullet and look towards a greater role for the private sector, and less vilification of organised business and corporate South Africa.

But patronage is equally attractive to those who have derived benefits. Old habits are hard to break. And eradicating the role of crony capitalism is unlikely to be broken in one leadership contest. It may just be a matter of degree that enhances sentiment if the right side of this battle wins in December.

Still, with stark choices and governance orientations emerging, it’s a risky few months for the country. And we have now begun the real battles of new policy directions that will bring with it much-needed inclusive growth and radically positive changes to growth, employment and societal renewal.

* Daniel Silke is director of the Political Futures Consultancy and is a noted keynote speaker and commentator. Views expressed are his own. Follow him on Twitter at @DanielSilke or visit his website.

anc  |  jacob zuma  |  daniel silke  |  #guptaleaks  |  state capture


Company Snapshot

Voting Booth

How concerned are you about ransomware attacks?

Previous results · Suggest a vote