SA should ditch 'wasteful and unnecessary' SOEs - analyst | Fin24
 
  • Solly Moeng

    Give business owners a reason to stay in South Africa.

  • Pravin Gordhan

    The minister says SA is paying more for electricity because of theft at Medupi and Kusile.

  • Keep Flying the Flag

    The ANC says the state must keep a 'restructured' SAA as a national airline.

Loading...

SA should ditch 'wasteful and unnecessary' SOEs - analyst

May 29 2017 15:01
Garth Zietsman

THE trend worldwide is for wealthier countries to have large governments. South Africa has a government larger than expected and still growing steadily. The international trend for poorer countries is to have many SOEs, and government investment a larger fraction of the total.

South Africa has more SOEs and government investment than is normal for a country at our level of development.  A recent assessment reported no fewer than 717 state-owned enterprises (SOEs) in South Africa with total assets of R1trn, or 27% of GDP, and government investment amounting to more than 30% of our total investment. 

As can be seen from South Africa’s Tax Freedom Day* which this year fell on May 25, same as last year but six weeks later than in 1994 and a full two months later than 1972, SOEs are a substantial burden on the taxpayer and economy.

Orthodox economics says that return on investment in government is lower than in the private sector because, in an SOE, the incentives of stakeholders and the associated bureaucracy, as well as the lack of competition, do not encourage efficiency or innovation.

Our government has admitted as much. In its report on SOEs, it stated that over the five years up to 2014/15, the return on investment in SOEs had declined to a low 2.9%. Shifting resource allocation from private enterprise to government slows down growth which, long term, adversely affects welfare. A 2%, rather than a 1%, per capita growth rate, over 70 years, would result in double the relative welfare.

SAA cost R35bn in bailouts since 2007

Some SOEs are so inefficient that they make large and/or persistent losses. An obvious example is South African Airways (SAA), which has cost Treasury more than R35bn in bailouts since 2007. Government says it has no plans to get rid of or to privatise SAA even though there is no good reason to keep it.

The purpose of an SOE is not to create jobs, but to supply a valued public service. Employing almost as many people, private companies competing for air routes and customers could supply a far better service without making a loss (at least not one for taxpayers to bear). The same applies to all other SOEs.

Bad as it is, SAA is not nearly the largest lossmaker among South Africa’s SOEs. In 2014/2015, five SOEs managed to lose R20.6bn or 2% of government revenue. It may not sound like much, but it would have been enough to roughly double the rate of housing delivery – not to mention the thousands of building jobs that this would entail. 

No matter whether SOEs are profitable or not, they create a direct drag on the rest of the economy through being protected from competition, and an indirect drag by being a large, wasteful fraction of the economy. Protecting inefficient enterprises, or shoring them up, slows the growth of productivity and reduces the number of sustainable jobs that would result from a growing economy.

To sum up, SOEs are unnecessary for welfare and employment; inefficient or downright wasteful enterprises; a drag on the economy; create major opportunity costs; expose the Treasury to significant risk and the country to bad investment ratings. 

Another area where the South African government underperforms is in keeping peace and providing justice and good governance, i.e. rule of law. Government has no business doing anything unless it has provided for adequate rule of law. Providing a sound justice system is costly and there is a tight relationship between government consumption and good law indices. 

Nevertheless, governments do vary in how much they spend to provide a given level of rule of law. By international standards, and the current level of government consumption, rule of law in South Africa falls short by 26% to 27%. Alternatively, given our current state of rule of law, government consumption is 26% to 27% too high and, arguably, we need a much better justice system than is being provided for.

By any reasonable standard, South Africa has far too many of SOEs and far too little rule of law. To invest in better rule of law without increasing the tax load to higher growth sapping levels, we need to end wasteful and unnecessary SOEs.

* Tax Freedom Day (TFD) is the day after which South Africans have worked enough days to pay their taxes. Tax Freedom Day is calculated by dividing general government revenue by GDP for a calendar year, applying this fraction to the number of days in a year, and adding a day. TFD 2017 fell on May 25.

- Garth Zietsman is a statistician and consultant The views expressed in the article are the author’s and are not necessarily shared by the members of the Free Market Foundation.



opinion  |  state-owned enterprises
NEXT ON FIN24X

 
 
 
 

Company Snapshot

Voting Booth

How concerned are you about ransomware attacks?

Previous results · Suggest a vote

Loading...