Maintaining a clean numbers business | Fin24
 
  • New Notes

    Long queues have formed in Harare after Zimbabwe released new bank notes and coins.

  • Open Book

    Former President Jacob Zuma says the public protector can access his tax records.

  • Electricity

    Sowetans should pay rate of R150/month to foster a payment culture, says an ANC councillor.

Loading...

Maintaining a clean numbers business

Sep 16 2018 11:06
Bernard Agulhas

On August 22, Cabinet approved the draft amendments to the Auditing Profession Act (APA) (Act 26 of 2005) and referred these to Parliament for consultation as part of the Financial Matters Bill, 2018.

Consultation closed this past Friday and it is hoped that the amendments will be passed by the end of the year.

The reforms of auditing and accounting regulations started when former finance minister Trevor Manuel adopted the recommendations of the 2003 World Bank Report on the Observance of Standards and Codes (ROSC) for accounting and auditing.

The report suggested that government focus on strengthening the enforcement mechanisms for ensuring compliance with established accounting and auditing requirements by “establishing an independent oversight body, consisting of eminent persons, and restructuring the statutory regulator of the auditing profession under an effective governance structure and with broader mandate for efficiently regulating the profession”.

Until then, the profession had been governed by the Public Accountants and Auditors Board – now known as the Independent Regulatory Board for Auditors (Irba) –under a regime of self-regulation with limited powers.

Essentially, this meant there was insufficient independence of the regulator from those whom it regulated, which manifested in provisions that required practicing auditors to be members of the board of Paab, the governing body.

In 2005, South Africa became one of the first countries worldwide to adopt Irba, which was created under the APA, creating a statutory oversight board for which the maximum number of auditors was prescribed (no more than 40%) with powers to lay down regulations and set standards.

In 2008, Irba became one of the founding members of the International Forum of Independent Audit Regulators (Ifiar), a forum which shares best practices in regulation and which has a mission to strengthen global audit quality.

One of the requirements to become a member of Ifiar is that the audit regulator must be completely independent of the auditing profession.

As a public entity, Irba reports to the minister of finance and its independent board is appointed by the minister.

Irba is charged with the oversight of auditors in the interest of public protection and through its act has disciplinary powers to hold auditors accountable for non-compliance to the Code of Professional Conduct and the International Standards on Auditing.

The statutory body guards the independence of its board and committees by limiting the involvement of practising auditors in these structures.

Over the years, Irba has continued to make improvements to regulation within its mandate.

The auditor’s report has been improved and includes more disclosures than before for the benefit of investors.

In 2015, mandatory disclosure of the audit tenure of the audit firm with the client was required as a part of the independent auditor’s report.

This was to highlight potential familiarity threats for investors that could lead to independence issues that could, in turn, affect the reliability and credibility of the audit opinion on the financial statements.

Further improvements were made to strengthen Irba’s inspections and investigations departments based on the recommendations of the 2013 World Bank ROSC.

However, deficiencies in audit quality concerned the board, which required that more should be done to protect the public, safeguard auditor independence, improve the quality of audit and enhance trust in the credibility of audit opinions.

Last year the board prescribed that from 2023 mandatory audit firm rotation would be required every 10 years. This progressive implementation of standards, regulations and guidelines is a necessary role of effective regulators worldwide in support of continual improvement and the creation of public trust.

Great expectations 

Recently it became evident that the public expected more of Irba than the APA prescribed or allowed, specifically considering the recent audit and accounting failures. The limit to monetary sanctions and the speed of bringing auditors to account were key among these.

The act amendment process was subsequently fast-tracked and submitted to Treasury in December last year.

It includes several changes that will address not only the low level of fines, but others that will either remove restrictions to obtain critical information for investigations and further strengthen the independence of Irba.

The amendments apply mostly to the investigation and disciplinary process.

These amendments will provide Irba with subpoena powers in the investigation process, simplify the disciplinary hearing process and provide the minister of finance with the power to determine maximum fines, currently limited by the audit legislation to R200 000 per offence.

The ability to subpoena will ensure that Irba has immediate access to all the evidence and audit files it requires to complete an investigation more speedily, even where information is being withheld.

This will shorten the duration of investigations, which previously have been delayed by non-cooperation from audit firms.

The disciplinary process has been simplified, without infringing on the rights of any of the parties, by removing many of the burdensome legal practices, meaning that disciplinary matters have been heard in a manner similar to that of a high court, making them unnecessarily lengthy and costly.

Giving the minister of finance discretion to determine the upper limit of fines means that sanctions handed down on guilty auditors and their firms can be increased beyond the previous R200 000 limit per charge.

Finance Minister Nhlanhla Nene has not indicated what level of fine he would prescribe.

It is likely to be significantly more than the current limit, so this will provide a more effective deterrent to unethical behaviour.

In dealing with constraints, the amendments propose removing limits to the size of the disciplinary committee, allowing Irba to appoint as many members as it determines, which will allow it to call on additional resources when there is any substantial increase in the number of matters to be considered.

Currently, the limited number of committee members, often further limited by the exclusion of members who might have a conflict of interest and availability of members, has a negative effect on the speed at which matters can be heard.

Given Irba’s focus on public protection, and that some investigations and matters referred to it are issues that do not relate to public interest entities (PIEs), an amendment to allow Irba to refer non-PIE matters to another relevant body will ensure that Irba can focus on public interest matters.

This will improve the utilisation of limited resources for matters in the public interest.

This body would be accredited by Irba, meaning that Irba will still have oversight over the manner in which the processes are run by the accredited body.

The amendments to the APA are likely to have a major effect on the way in which auditors approach their work, quality and ethics.

Therefore, we expect a positive effect on behaviour and increased focus on audit quality and ethics by auditors.

However, the amendments on their own will not prevent corporate malfeasance, fraud or future scandals as business failures can be caused by complex internal fraud and corruption by directors or employees.

Until the whole financial reporting ecosystem is regulated, which was also included among the recommendations in the 2013 World Bank ROSC, there will continue to be opportunity for such malfeasance to exist and possibly go unpunished.

However, when it comes to the fourth “line of defence” – external audit – we believe that greater powers will enable Irba to act more swiftly in identifying, investigating and disciplining errant auditors and hand down punishment more appropriate to the nature of the transgression.

The proposed changes can only bode well for Irba to deliver effectively and efficiently on its mandate, which must then ultimately be in the best interest of the public and investors, and support Irba in responding to stakeholder expectations.

* Agulhas is CEO of Irba

* Sign up to Fin24's top news in your inbox: SUBSCRIBE TO FIN24 NEWSLETTER

irba  |  bernard agulhas  |  accounting
NEXT ON FIN24X

 
 
 

Read Fin24’s Comments Policy

24.com publishes all comments posted on articles provided that they adhere to our Comments Policy. Should you wish to report a comment for editorial review, please do so by clicking the 'Report Comment' button to the right of each comment.

Comment on this story
0 comments
Add your comment
Comment 0 characters remaining
 

Company Snapshot

Money Clinic

Money Clinic
Do you have a question about your finances? We'll get an expert opinion.
Click here...

Voting Booth

What do you think about private healthcare in SA?

Previous results · Suggest a vote

Loading...