Can workers demand better working conditions through strikes? | Fin24
 
Loading...

Can workers demand better working conditions through strikes?

Nov 09 2017 07:49
Tertius Wessels

STRIKES are largely, but not always, about wages. The recent and so-called “strike certificate” obtained by the National Union of Metalworkers of South Africa (NUMSA) against the Road Accident Fund (RAF) highlights this. It also raises questions around employees' right to strike and, more importantly, to what extent they are protected when participating in strike action.

People often limit strikes to wage disputes and other monetary-related issues. But employees have the right to strike if they have a collective grievance about various work-related issues.

NUMSA lodged a dispute with the Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration (CCMA) after employees’ attempts to address and resolve grievances with the RAF regarding their working conditions, failed.

As the CCMA was unable to resolve the dispute, a certificate of non-resolution was issued, certifying that the dispute remained unresolved. This means RAF employees were now in a position to embark on a protected strike.

A strike can be defined as “action taken by employees to remedy a grievance or resolve a dispute about a matter of mutual interest between the employer and employees”.  Strikes can take different forms and need not necessarily be complete work stoppages. They can be intermittent work stoppages or the refusal to work overtime.

According to the Labour Relations Act, a strike is "the partial or complete concerted refusal to work or the retardation or obstruction of work by persons who are or who have been employed by the same employer or by different employers, for the purpose of remedying a grievance or resolving a dispute in respect of any matter of mutual interest between the employer and the employee".

Employees need to understand to what extent they are protected during a strike. The correct procedures need to be followed for a strike to be deemed protected. The first step in the process is to try and resolve the dispute internally, failing which employees should refer the dispute to the CCMA.

If the CCMA is unable to facilitate an agreement between the two parties, a certificate of non-resolution will be issued and employees would then be entitled to embark on a strike after giving their employer proper notice of their intention to do so.

NUMSA and the RAF followed the appropriate steps to obtain a certificate of non-resolution. RAF employees can now issue a notice of their intention to embark on a strike, provided they give the employer sufficient notice.

Notably, the RAF does not have recourse against its employees for participating in a protected strike. Even though employees are contractually obliged to come to work, the right to strike is contained within our Constitution. Since the RAF strike is protected, the employer cannot take disciplinary action against the employees for their refusal to work.

But participation in a protected strike, however, does not exempt employees from civil or criminal liability. Section 67(5) of the LRA provides that nothing prevents an employer from fairly dismissing an employee for a reason related to the employee's conduct during the strike or for a reason related to the employee's operational requirements. Employees may also be held civilly and/or criminally liable for their conduct and/or behaviour during a protected strike.

In response to a strike, employers will almost always deny employees access to the workplace.

This is known as a defensive lock-out, a tactic used to compel employees to unconditionally withdraw their demands or to accept a demand of the employer. Both strikes and lock-outs can have a highly detrimental impact on the relationship between employer and employees, especially if they were already strained at the outset.

Strikes, lock-outs and other drastic measures can be avoided if employers and employees engage in a collective bargaining process.  When employers are transparent and enjoy good relationships with their employees or trade unions, they have more chance of reaching mutually beneficial agreements through a constructive negotiation process.

Due to the principle of "no work, no pay" applying during strikes, it is in employees’ best interests to resolve issues before they escalate to a potential strike or lock-out scenario.

A good example of this is the successful deflection of a looming strike at SAA Technical. Parties reached a mutual wage agreement by engaging with each other.

There are various other strikes across industries, such as the Motor Industry and Metal and Engineering Industry, which were avoided due to parties being able to reach a mutual agreement without resorting to industrial action.

Ultimately, disputes can be avoided if employers and employees, and employers and trade unions nurture good relationships with each other and engage each other in good faith. This will facilitate more honest and open discussions and would allow parties to reach a mutually beneficial agreement.

Advocate Tertius Wessels is a Legal Manager at Strata-g Labour Solutions

SUBSCRIBE FOR FREE UPDATE: Get Fin24's top morning business news and opinions in your inbox.

Read Fin24's top stories trending on Twitter:

Follow Fin24 on Twitter, Facebook, Google+ and Pinterest. 24.com encourages commentary submitted via MyNews24. Contributions of 200 words or more will be considered for publication.

raf  |  numsa  |  strike  |  labour action
NEXT ON FIN24X

 
 
 
 

Company Snapshot

Money Clinic

Money Clinic
Do you have a question about your finances? We'll get an expert opinion.
Click here...

Voting Booth

Would you switch to a bank that rewarded you for 'good' financial behaviour?

Previous results · Suggest a vote

Loading...