• Fascism and brutality

    We should prevent opportunists from using legacies of the past to further their own interests, says Solly Moeng.

  • Terry Bell's Inside Labour

    Despite little cheer for today's youth, their predecessors showed political will can be awakened.

  • Ian Mann's book review

    Bragging about skipping sleep is as absurd as bragging about driving drunk, says Ian Mann.

Loading...

Save on tax by diversifying your retirement savings

Jan 10 2018 15:57

Cape Town - Maximising your tax efficiency and achieving the best possible income in your golden years could mean finding a balance between your discretionary and retirement savings.

Danie Venter, a Certified Financial Planner and advisory partner at Citadel Investment Services, says making sure that you are saving enough for a financially secure retirement is absolutely crucial.

He, however, warns that many investors fall prey to the common financial mistake of over-contributing towards their retirement funds.

The SA Revenue Service (SARS) allows tax deductions for contributions to a pension fund, provident fund or retirement annuity up to the value of 27.5% of the greater of your taxable income or remuneration. This deduction is also limited to an annual ceiling of R350 000.

“It represents a generous tax incentive to increase your retirement savings, but remember that your investment strategy should also take into consideration your tax consequences after retirement,” he says.

“It’s worth noting that, while contributions above these limits will be added to the tax-free portion of your withdrawal allowance at retirement, these contributions are not adjusted for inflation, losing their value in real terms.”

To demonstrate the benefit of having a savings mix, Venter offers the example of a 44-year old investor named Richard, who earns R62 500 each month or R750 000 per annum.

Having lived frugally and saved faithfully from his first pay check, Richard now has R2m in his retirement savings pot and is free of any debt.

Venter then compares two scenarios based on Richard’s decision to focus solely on retirement savings, or opt to additionally build up a discretionary savings portfolio.  

Scenario 1 – Saves 27.5% in retirement savings

Wishing to retire at the age of 65 years, Richard increases his retirement fund contributions to 27.5% of his salary, or R17 187 each month - amounting to a total of R206 250 every year.

Without retirement savings, Richard’s total tax liability would be R212 490. Implementing the 27.5% contribution would then mean a tax saving of R81 000 every year, leaving him with a net annual income of R412 175.

Assuming that his contributions increase by 6% each year in line with inflation, and that his retirement portfolio delivers returns of 8.5% per annum net of fees, his retirement savings would ultimately be worth a princely R8.9m in today’s value.

Richard next decides to withdraw the full one-third portion of his retirement savings allowed at retirement, amounting to just under R3m. As the first R500 000 of the amount withdrawn from your savings is tax-free, Richard would pay a total of R822 349 in tax on this withdrawal or 27.6%.

He then invests the remaining R2.15m in a discretionary investment portfolio to ensure he has better access to his funds in the event of an emergency and leaving R5.95m in his retirement savings, which he uses to purchase a living annuity. He selects a 7.5% drawdown level from both his discretionary and his retirement savings for income.

However, future withdrawals from his discretionary savings will be subject to capital gains tax (CGT), which is capped at an effective tax rate of 18% for individuals and has an annual capital gains exclusion of R40 000 per annum.

The income from his retirement savings, on the other hand, will be subject to income tax, which could accumulate to a marginal rate of 45%.

7.5% drawn from both retirement and discretionary portfolios:

 (Source: Citadel)

By comparison, had Richard invested all his savings in a living annuity instead of withdrawing a one-third portion to invest in discretionary savings, he would need to withdraw nearly a third more from his living annuity each year to achieve a similar income, or at least R690 000 per annum.

This would then be subject to an effective tax rate of 26.2%, meaning that he would also be paying R70 000 more in tax each year than if he had invested a portion in discretionary savings.

All savings in living annuity:

 (Source: Citadel)

Scenario 2 – Saves 15% in retirement savings and the balance in discretionary savings

In this scenario, before deciding how best to save towards his retirement, Richard consults a financial adviser, who advises him to consider implementing a discretionary savings portfolio in addition to his retirement savings.

Instead of investing the full 27.5% tax deductible portion of his salary into retirement savings, Richard chooses to contribute 15% of his salary or R9 375 every month to his retirement savings.

His net annual income after tax would therefore change to R469 718, instead of R 412 175 where he maximises his retirement savings contribution (27.5%). Instead of spending this difference of R57 543 he decides to invest this amount in a discretionary savings portfolio.

Assuming that he again increases his contributions in line with inflation of 6% every year, and that he achieves the same 8.5% return net of fees, this means that at the age of 65 years Richard would have a total of R6.4m in his retirement savings and R1.7m in discretionary savings.

The discretionary savings is then bolstered by withdrawing R1.37m from his retirement savings, paying only R247 500 in tax. He then invests the R5m remaining in his retirement savings in a living annuity.

To achieve a similar annual income of over R500 000 as in the first scenario, he would need to withdraw as little as R372 875 or 7.5% from his retirement savings each year, and supplement his annual income by withdrawing just under R223 948 (8%) from his discretionary savings.

This would result in a tax saving of R100 000 in comparison to exclusively contributing towards retirement savings.

Saving 15% in retirement savings and balance in discretionary savings:

 (Source: Citadel)

Additional benefits of having a savings mix

Venter emphasises the need for flexibility in building your investment portfolio, pointing out a range of additional benefits to ensure you have a savings mix.

For example, unlike retirement savings, discretionary investments are not restricted regarding where you can invest. For example, retirement vehicles restrict offshore exposure to 25%, whereas discretionary savings can invest fully offshore, allowing for protection against a volatile local currency.

“Also remember that once your retirement funds are converted into retirement income (or a pension), 'emigrating' with the funds will not be possible. Even if you decide to emigrate from SA, your income would first need to be paid into a South African bank account."

UPDATE:

In reaction to this article, Fin24 user Johann Kassier raised some aspects with which he did not agree and Venter responded with a more detailed calculation. Read it here.

* Sign up to Fin24's top news in your inbox: SUBSCRIBE TO FIN24 NEWSLETTER


Follow Fin24 on Twitter, Facebook, Google+ and Pinterest. 24.com encourages commentary submitted via MyNews24. Contributions of 200 words or more will be considered for publication.

citadel  |  tax  |  money
NEXT ON FIN24X

 
 
 
 

Company Snapshot

Money Clinic

Money Clinic
Do you have a question about your finances? We'll get an expert opinion.
Click here...

Voting Booth

Are you prepared for the latest round of Eskom’s load shedding??

Previous results · Suggest a vote

Loading...