Fed officials debated hiking rates to restrictive territory | Fin24
  • Load Shedding Schedules

    Find information for Johannesburg, Durban, Cape Town and other cities.

  • Eskom

    Critical repairs being done during 21-day lockdown as demand plummets.

  • Mills Soko

    China's success in addressing the coronavirus crisis speaks to the importance of decisive leadership.


Fed officials debated hiking rates to restrictive territory

Oct 17 2018 22:00
Christopher Condon, Bloomberg

Federal Reserve officials stepped deeper into a debate over how high to push interest rates, with a majority appearing to favour an eventual and temporary move above the level they deem neutral for the economy in the long run.

"A few participants expected that policy would need to become modestly restrictive for a time and a number judged that it would be necessary to temporarily raise the federal funds rate above their assessments of its longer-run level," according to minutes of the Federal Open Market Committee’s (FOMC) September 25 - 26 meeting released Wednesday in Washington.

In their most recent projections, officials estimated that long- run neutral level to be about 3%.

A "couple" of FOMC members argued against adopting a restrictive policy "in the absence of clear signs of an overheating economy and rising inflation," according to the minutes.

The committee was otherwise in broad agreement over continuing on the current, gradual path of rate increases. The record showed "all participants" backed the September 26, 25 basis points hike to a range of 2% to 2.25%.

Balance risks

The release of the minutes comes three weeks after central bankers signaled their intention to hike again before year end.

Chairman Jerome Powell has said he’s trying to balance the risks of allowing the economy to overheat by moving too slowly, and smothering the second longest economic expansion on record by hiking too quickly.

The Fed’s tightening has drawn criticism from President Donald Trump, who blamed it for the stock market decline last week. The minutes revealed no discussion among policy makers of the president’s remarks and no sign they had influenced their outlook for rates.

"Participants generally anticipated that further gradual increases in the target range for the federal funds rate would most likely be consistent with a sustained economic expansion, strong labour market conditions and inflation near 2% over the medium term," according to the minutes.

Confidence appeared to be growing among officials that inflation would remain near their 2% target. Recent data on consumer prices was "consistent with their expectation that inflation was on a trajectory to achieve the committee’s symmetric 2% objective on a sustained basis," the minutes said.

After falling short of that target for most of the past six years, the Fed’s preferred measure of inflation has now met or exceeded 2% for six straight months.

The minutes repeated an explanation offered by Powell at his post-meeting press conference for why their statement should drop the long-standing description of monetary policy as "accommodative."

"Waiting until the target range for the federal funds rate had been increased further to remove the characterisation of the policy stance as 'accommodative' could convey a false sense of precision in light of the considerable uncertainty surrounding all estimates of the neutral federal funds rate," the minutes said.

The record showed Fed officials again held a lengthy discussion over the effects on the economy of ongoing trade disputes.

A "number" of central bankers reported that business contacts had foregone production and investment opportunities because of uncertainty over trade policy. They also reported that some firms were attempting to diversify their import and export options for the same reasons.

Regarding issues of financial stability, some officials expressed concern about growth in and relaxed standards for leveraged loans as "reasons to remain mindful of vulnerabilities and possible risks to financial stability."

Powell and some of his colleagues have noted that the greater risk associated with overheating the economy may come through financial-market excesses rather than inflation.

* Sign up to Fin24's top news in your inbox: SUBSCRIBE TO FIN24 NEWSLETTER  

jerome powell  |  us  |  markets  |  federal reserve


Company Snapshot

Voting Booth

Do you support a reduction in the public sector wage bill?

Previous results · Suggest a vote