Labour: Striking a deal with minimum fallout | Fin24

Labour: Striking a deal with minimum fallout

Jul 07 2016 08:00
Lesiba Seshoka
Lesiba Seshoka, executive director: corporate rela

Lesiba Seshoka, executive director: corporate relations at the University of KwaZulu-Natal. (Picture supplied.)

Related Articles

Cosatu calls on unions to balance pay demands with job security

Labour calls for cap on salaries of high earners

Minimum wage could be agreed soon


The National Economic Development and Labour Council (Nedlac) – a consensus-seeking institution consisting of government, labour and business – currently has two extremely important proposals on its agenda: minimum wages and new rules to improve labour market stability.

Both issues are crucial because, if properly resolved, South Africa may become an investment destination of choice. If not, the introduction of a high minimum wage ahead of local elections in August, as a “quick fix” to calm discontent over the lack of an improvement in living standards, could deter investment in an economy that is already struggling to grow and keep a junk credit rating at bay, ratings agency Fitch warned in May.

Settling strikes

On the issue of labour market stability, a Nedlac task team was established to deal with excessively long strikes that impact business continuity, sustainability and employee earnings. One of the proposals under consideration is the amendment of certain sections of the Labour Relations Act (LRA), which will introduce compulsory secret balloting of trade union members before industrial action can be taken.

In other words, should union members not overwhelmingly vote in favour of a strike, it would not be allowed to take place.

The balloting is envisaged to be overseen by the office of an independent registrar.

Furthermore, a code of good practice on collective bargaining and industrial action would be developed, which will prohibit the carrying of dangerous weapons during strikes, as well as the prohibition of intimidation and improper conduct on the part of strikers and non-strikers. 

There is no doubt that the Nedlac partners have learnt the lessons of Marikana, but the question is whether the parties would be able to agree and finally unravel the labour market policy conundrum that has characterised SA post-1994. The reality is that Nedlac has always found itself in the usual quagmire that often accompanies consensus-seeking institutions, and thus it is highly unlikely that major concessions will be agreed to.

The envisaged changes could limit the perennial industrial action SA has been faced with since 1994, as well as the nature of such action.

There have been a lot of damaging worker strikes in the country that were sustained through intimidation. Dangerous weapons such as knobkerries, knives and guns have become characteristic of strikes, and are often used as a stern warning for those who want to break ranks. Property is quite often damaged.

But strike action is an important tool in the hands of unions against employers who sometimes unreasonably refuse to accede to workers’ demands. Giving workers a secret vote to decide whether to strike or not is important for workplace democracy, but unions are likely to fight against it tooth and nail. 

The Cosatu factor

The ruling ANC, which is in alliance with Cosatu, is caught between a rock and a hard place. It would be in the interest of the state to have fewer strikes with no violence, as this will benefit the economy and help the overburdened law enforcement agencies. But at the same time, the ruling party would also want to please its trade union partner Cosatu.

Take the recent flip-flopping on retirement policy. President Jacob Zuma had signed into law both the 2015 Tax Laws Amendment Act and the Tax Administration Laws Amendment Act, popularly known as the retirement reform laws.

Zuma approved the amendments despite an impasse at Nedlac, where government and business were in agreement on the reforms, but labour opposed it. Yet the ink had barely dried when Zuma made an about-turn on the new rules on the insistence of Cosatu, which issued a stern warning to the ruling party. 

Cosatu said in a statement following Zuma’s signing of the amendments that it is “an outrageous and blatant act of provocation by the ANC-led government that will have dire and lasting consequences on the relationship between government and the workers… This is not just a slight against the federation and the emasculation and undermining of Nedlac, but it is an offence against all working people, who have their deferred wages to look to after retirement”.

Minimum wage

The debate on a minimum wage is likely to be as contentious. While a minimum wage exists in certain sectors already (for example, for domestic and farm workers), no across-the-board national minimum wage, as demanded by Cosatu, exists.

Former Reserve Bank governor Tito Mboweni is one political heavyweight who has come out in favour of a minimum wage, but he said this should be implemented on a sectoral basis. Opponents of a minimum wage say it would lead to further job losses and deter investors.

As long as government understands that one cannot hunt with the hounds and run with the hares, it should not be difficult to pick a partner this time around: does it want an economy heading for junk, or one that is on the highway to prosperity?

Lesiba Seshoka is a former journalist and editor and served as spokesperson of the National Union of Mineworkers for seven years. He currently works as executive director: corporate relations at the University of KwaZulu-Natal (UKZN), and writes in his personal capacity. 

This article originally appeared in the 30 June edition of finweek. Buy and download the magazine here

tito mboweni  |  cosatu  |  strikes  |  labour  |  wage agreement

12 December issue
Subscribe to finweek