Publications
Partners
Measles killed 72 children and adults in Europe in 2018.
According to the World Health Organization (WHO), the total number of people infected with the virus in 2018 was the highest this decade: three times the total reported in 2017 and 15 times the record-low number of people affected in 2016.
This has happened despite a higher average number of immunisations across Europe.
According to WHO and UNICEF estimates, the number of children in the region who received a second dose of measles-containing vaccines has risen from 73% in 2009 to 90% by 2018.
So how is it possible that more immunisation could still result in the rapid escalation of measles cases?
The answer lies in the distribution of immunisations.
Whereas there are many communities that immunise fully, several pockets of Europe don’t.
It is in these small pockets that measles outbreaks occur.
One of those is Italy, where anti-vaccine groups allied with populist politicians last year abolished a law that made vaccines compulsory, only for it to be repealed a short time later after measles cases soared.
The threat of measles is now so severe that the WHO for the first time ever listed vaccine hesitancy as one of the top 10 global threats of 2019. One may wonder why it is possible for one of the richest regions of the world to still suffer the consequences of a disease that is entirely preventable.
There are many reasons why anti-vaxxers, as they have come to be known, choose not to vaccinate their children.
On the surface, it may seem like irrational support for pseudo-science, but ultimately the motives are political, economic or religious.
But in poor societies, it is often simply a lack of information.
And so an obvious question is what to do in a society where vaccination rates are low because people simply don’t know about the social benefits of immunisation.Celebrity Twitter.
A new NBER working paper reports the results of a large study that tested whether celebrity Twitter endorsements of an immunisation campaign in Indonesia had any effects on Twitter users.
Indonesia is the ideal country to study this: it has both a large, unimmunised population, and it is one of the largest users of Twitter.
The results, in short, are profound: celebrity endorsements matter, both in how quickly information spreads and whether it actually affects behaviour.
Celebrities’ Twitter endorsements of a vaccination campaign actually made people immunise their children more.
Here’s how the test was done.
The authors recruited 46 high-profile celebrities, with a combined total of more than 7.8m followers, who agreed to open their Twitter accounts to the researchers to randomly send a series of tweets with the campaign hashtag #AyoImunisasi (‘Let’s Immunise’).
The authors then tested whether tweets by these celebrities are more likely to be retweeted and liked, and reach a wider audience.
“‘We find using this design that when an individual observes a given message through a retweet, and that message was randomized to be composed by a celebrity as compared to an ordinary individual, there is a 70% increase in the number of likes and retweets, compared to similar messages when the celebrity’s involvement was masked.”
The authors can also study whether multiple messages from different celebrities have a larger effect.
It does: “While going from one to two messages increases the probability of retweeting two-fold, and going from one to three increases the probability by 2.5-fold, the effect flattens out after that.”
The more interesting question is, of course, whether retweets have any real-world outcomes.
To study this, the authors conducted the study during two phases (July to August 2015, and November to February 2016).
They then did a phone survey with Twitter users, asking them general knowledge questions and questions about vaccination.
If the latter was different for those exposed to the Twitter campaign but not the former, then the effect of the Twitter campaign could be interpreted as causal.
When 15 tweets or retweets shows up in a respondent’s Twitter feed for one month, there is a 20% increase in their probability of knowing the hashtag #AyoImunisasi.
A one standard deviation increase to the campaign also caused a 12% increase in knowing that vaccinations are produced locally, an important piece of information in Indonesia because domestically produced vaccines are known to be halaal.
This matters, because it also affects their behaviour – and the behaviour of their closest relatives.
“We find consistent evidence that in each type of network – neighbours, relatives, and friends – of those exposed to the campaign, those exposed to the Twitter campaign were more likely to report that their network members actually immunized their children.”
We may scoff at the attention celebrities get on social media (and the lengths they go to to get it), but as this research shows, their influence can have real-world consequences.
Sharing information about the benefits of vaccines can save lives.
Now to get Bonang and other South African celebs to take note… #LetsImmunise.
Johan Fourie is associate professor in economics at Stellenbosch University.
This article originally appeared in the 21 March edition of finweek. Buy and download the magazine here or subscribe to our newsletter here.
