Zuma responds to Parliament's state capture questions | Fin24
  • Data Market Inquiry

    MTN says it is prepared to defend itself before Competition Tribunal over report.

  • Claims of sabotage

    What we know so far about allegations of sabotage at an Eskom power station.

  • Dudu Myeni

    Court dismisses former SAA chiar's bid to have Outa withdraw from delinquency case.


Zuma responds to Parliament's state capture questions

Sep 21 2016 15:20
Matthew le Cordeur

Cape Town – Opposition party parliamentarians failed to get President Jacob Zuma to admit to any form of alleged state capture resulting from his friendship with the Gupta family.

On Wednesday, Zuma submitted written parliamentary replies to several questions posed by Members of Parliament, ranging from alleged visits to the Guptas’ residence in Saxonworld to alleged links between Department of Mineral Resources Minister Mosebenzi Zwane and the Guptas.

It is alleged that the Guptas used their friendship with Zuma to build their business operations with the use of government tenders. The Guptas and Zuma have on several occasion denied such claims, and have requested that they be tested in a court. The alleged state capture is under investigation by the public protector

The Democratic Alliance asked Zuma if he or a member of his Cabinet visited the Gupta family compound in Saxonwold in Johannesburg on September 20 2015, just before Zwane became mineral resources minister.

“Did the discussion include the subsequent reshuffling that happened in the Ministry of Mineral Resources portfolio?” they asked.

“If so, what was the nature of the discussions regarding the appointment of the new minister of mineral resources; if not, is he aware of any member of his Cabinet visiting the Gupta family compound on September 20 2015; if so, who made the visit?”

Zuma's response was simply that the presidency “was informed by the public protector that she has received complaints and requests that she should investigate this matter or related allegations”.

“The public protector’s investigation is still continuing,” said Zuma.

The DA then asked if Zuma was ever informed of the Guptas offering Cabinet positions to any ministers during his term of office as president.

“The appointment of members of the cabinet both ministers and deputy ministers remains my sole prerogative as president,” Zuma responded.

“I learnt about the statement attributed to the deputy finance minister about the job offer in the media. I would like to reiterate that the task to appoint ministers or members of the Cabinet is the constitutional prerogative of the president of the Republic.”

DA finance spokesperson David Maynier wanted to know whether Zuma would take action against Zwane after he erroneously released a Cabinet statement saying the inter-ministerial committee recommended that Zuma should launch an inquiry into the blacklisting of the bank accounts of the Guptas' companies.

“The statement issued by … Zwane on 1 September 2016 … was issued in his personal capacity and not on behalf of the task team or Cabinet,” Zuma said.

“I reassured the public, the banking sector as well as domestic and international investors of government’s unwavering commitment to the letter and spirit of the country’s constitution, as well as in the sound fiscal and economic fundamentals that underpin our economy.

Fin24's top stories trending on Twitter:



Company Snapshot

Voting Booth

How concerned are you about ransomware attacks?

Previous results · Suggest a vote