Valuer-General does not replace court in determining compensation for expropriation - chamber | Fin24
 
  • Load Shedding

    Schedules for Cape Town, Jhb, Durban, East London and Polokwane, plus links to more.

  • Forensic Probe

    Steinhoff's overview of the PwC report is a whitewash laced with white privilege - Ferial Haffajee

  • Fin24’s newsletter

    Sign up to receive Fin24's top news in your inbox every morning.

Loading...

Valuer-General does not replace court in determining compensation for expropriation - chamber

Mar 08 2019 21:01

The Land Claims Court has in essence confirmed that a valuation by the Valuer-General would not replace the role of the courts as the final arbitrator when compensation for expropriation is calculated, the Agricultural Business Chamber (Agbiz) said in its latest newsletter.

It bases this view on the judgment handed down by the Land Claims Court in February in the case of Moloto Community versus Minister of Rural Development and Land Reform and Others.

According to Agbiz, the court has effectively confirmed that a valuation by the Valuer-General does not exclude the jurisdiction of the courts in determining just and equitable compensation.

"Although the Property Valuation Act does not use the terms 'compensation' or 'expropriation' once in its provisions, the term 'value' was defined in a manner which mirrors the calculation of compensation for expropriation," states Agbiz.

"This in turn sparked fears that the Valuer-General, using a formula promulgated by regulation, would determine the amount of compensation to which a property owner or bond holder would be due if they were to be expropriated for land reform purposes."  

Agbiz said that, on analysing the law, experts have long held the belief that the Valuer-General cannot determine compensation to the exclusion of the court and merely informs the expropriating authority what offer to make or to assist in the investigative phase prior to expropriation.

"The Constitution states that compensation must ultimately be agreed upon, determined or approved by a court of law," said Agbiz.

"Although procedural aspects prevented the point from being argued at length before the court, it was noted that there was nothing in the act which the court could identify expressly that excludes its jurisdiction."


NEXT ON FIN24X

 
 
 
 

Company Snapshot

Money Clinic

Money Clinic
Do you have a question about your finances? We'll get an expert opinion.
Click here...

Voting Booth

Do you think government can solve the Eskom crisis?

Previous results · Suggest a vote

Loading...