IPP deal would be 'financial suicide' lawyer for Numsa tells court | Fin24
  • Covid-19 Money Hub

    The hub will help answer your business and money questions during the coronavirus crisis.

  • Dudu Myeni

    The former SAA chair has been declared a delinquent director for her role at the national airline.

  • Cigarette Ban

    Govt says emerging research shows smoking leads to more severe cases of Covid-19.


IPP deal would be 'financial suicide' lawyer for Numsa tells court

Mar 27 2018 21:55
Alex Mitchley

Pretoria - A lawyer for the National Union of Metalworkers of South Africa argued in the North Gauteng High Court on Tuesday that the signing of a deal by power utility Eskom with 27 independent power producers (IPPs) may be financial suicide. 

Numsa, along with Transform RSA, asked the court to grant an interdict against new Energy Minister Jeff Radebe to stop him from signing the renewable energy contracts. 

The contracts were set to be signed earlier this month. But this was put on hold after Numsa and Transform SA instituted a last-minute court bid.

The Department of Energy previously said it expected the signing of the agreements to go ahead as soon as the court matter was finished.

On Tuesday advocate Nazeer Cassim, for Numsa, told the court that some might view the signing of the renewable energy contracts a form of economic looting. 

He added that Eskom was already broke and that tax payers would have to foot these bills if things didn't go as planned. 

“We are trying to avert a disaster,” he said. 

Cassim said there already was an application by the Coal Transporters Forum to have the IPP agreements nullified. He asked that an interdict stopping the signing of the agreements be granted, until that application was dealt with. 

He also told the court that the application by the Coal Transporters Forum would deal with arguments that the IPPs didn’t comply with statutory frameworks and that there was no public participation. 

READ: Last-minute court bid blocks IPP signing

Advocate Barry Roux, for Eskom, argued that the parastatal’s financial situation could not be a reason to grant an interdict. 

Roux added that a court could not grant an interdict against the signing of the IPP agreements without first reviewing and setting aside the Minister of Energy’s determination in terms of the Electricity Regulation Act. 

Advocate Wim Trengove, for the IPPs, said all due processes were followed by the National Energy Regulator (Nersa) before they were entered into.

He said the applicants couldn't argue that the procedures behind the granting of the IPPs were flawed until they brought an application to have these procedures reviewed. 

Judge Dawie Fourie will deliver judgment on Thursday.

* Sign up to Fin24's top news in your inbox: SUBSCRIBE TO FIN24 NEWSLETTER

eskom  |  ipps  |  energy  |  power


Company Snapshot

Voting Booth

How has Covid-19 impacted your financial position?

Previous results · Suggest a vote