‘Colluding’ banks say charges are vague | Fin24
In partnership with
  • Cutting Back

    BP's CEO says he plans to sell some oil projects to meet climate targets in Paris agreement.

  • No-Deal Brexit

    The UK's worst-case scenario warns of food shortages and public disorder.

  • Fin24’s newsletter

    Sign up to receive Fin24's top news in your inbox every morning.


‘Colluding’ banks say charges are vague

May 07 2017 06:10
Dewald van Rensburg

Johannesburg - The banks charged with colluding in the trading of the rand have hit back at the Competition Commission, saying the allegations are “vague and embarrassing” with not enough detail being given for them to prepare a defence or decide how to plead.

Twelve banks filed exemption applications to the Competition Tribunal, arguing for the case to be dropped on a number of interrelated grounds.

The only banks not raising an exemption are Citibank, which has already settled for R70m, and the Barclays and Absa groups, which are cooperating to get leniency.

Standard Bank has already made an urgent application to the tribunal to compel the commission to release its full record of investigation, also claiming that it did not have enough information at hand to plead or argue its case.

The wholly foreign banks in the alleged cartel claim that the local competition authorities have no jurisdiction over them.

BNP Paribas also argues that the commission’s allegation against it is self-contradictory as the original referral claims the trader Jason Katz worked for BNP at the same time he allegedly worked for Standard Bank New York and Barclays.

Katz already pleaded guilty to forex-fixing in the US and he seems to single-handedly be responsible for several banks he worked for successively being drawn into this investigation.

BNP is one of the foreign banks claiming the tribunal has no jurisdiction.

The commission’s counterargument has been that anything affecting the rand has an effect in South Africa, hence giving the tribunal jurisdiction.

BNP and other foreign banks say, however, that there is no evidence or description of the alleged impact – or any attempt to identify who may have been impacted. Competition commissioner Tembinkosi Bonakele has previously admitted that an estimate of that sort would be a large research endeavour that has not been done.



Read Fin24’s Comments Policy

24.com publishes all comments posted on articles provided that they adhere to our Comments Policy. Should you wish to report a comment for editorial review, please do so by clicking the 'Report Comment' button to the right of each comment.

Comment on this story
Add your comment
Comment 0 characters remaining

Company Snapshot

Money Clinic

Money Clinic
Do you have a question about your finances? We'll get an expert opinion.
Click here...

Voting Booth

What's your view on deep sea mining?

Previous results · Suggest a vote