Sanral Winelands secrecy bid worries NGOs | Fin24

Sanral Winelands secrecy bid worries NGOs

Aug 01 2014 08:56
Johannesburg - Two non-governmental organisations raised concerns on Thursday about Sanral's application for certain court documents and court hearings to be kept secret.

"Our concern is that the degree of secrecy that is being imposed is greater than is necessary to protect any confidentiality interests at stake, if any," the Right2Know Campaign and Section 16 said in a statement.

The application, brought by the SA National Roads Agency Limited (Sanral) and Protea Parkways Consortium (PPC), would be heard in camera in the Western Cape High Court on Monday.

The application is part of litigation around the proposed N1/N2 Winelands Toll Highway Project.

In May last year, the high court granted the City of Cape Town an interim interdict preventing Sanral from implementing or advancing the toll project, including the conclusion of any contract or start of construction.

The interdict remains in force until the city's application is finalised. The city wants Sanral's declaration of the project and the selection of the preferred bidder, PPC, to be reviewed and set aside.

The NGOs said: "The Western Cape High Court has ordered that the court papers in the secrecy application be temporarily sealed until it has heard and decided on Sanral and PPC's claim to secrecy".

PPC and Sanral apparently do not want the matter to be heard in open court, and court documents to be in the public domain, due to concerns over "commercial confidentiality".

The NGOs were seeking admission to the case as friends of the court.

"We understand that there are no objections to our being admitted as friends of the court, but Sanral are still objecting to release of even redacted papers."

The public were denied access to all court papers - not only documents where confidentiality was claimed - unless consenting to a confidentiality agreement.

"Our efforts to make submissions as a friend of the court in respect of the merits of the secrecy claims have also been severely hindered by the unconstitutional sealing of the entire court record."

The NGOs were concerned that open justice and debate on a matter of significant public interest were being stifled.

"We welcome proposals from the parties that the judge be asked for directions, but should that not succeed in getting disclosure before the hearing we will have no choice but to launch a court application for disclosure of the record."

On Tuesday, the City of Cape Town's mayoral committee member for transport, Brett Herron, said the papers Sanral and PPC wanted kept secret contained data on the cost of the project, the expected socio-economic impact of the tolls, and what the toll fees would be spent on.

Herron said: "If the ruling is in favour of Sanral, information of great public importance about the proposed tolling of these roads and the construction thereof (to be funded by public money), will be withheld from the public.

"However, if the ruling is in favour of the city, the public disclosure of this information will go ahead as the matter will then be argued in an open court."

Asked for comment on Tuesday, Sanral spokesperson Vusi Mona said: "This matter is currently in court and Sanral respects the sub judice principle".

'No one believes process was clean'

Many Fin24 users have also expressed concern about Sanral's plans. A user who did not give his name said: "Sanral is the piggybank for the ANC!"

Fin24 user Ashley said: "I think that South Africans have reached a point where there is no trust left in the ANC government. Systemic corruption has eroded confidence to the extent that most doubt any ANC process. The state and party are fused, just like all of the collapsed, corrupt communist systems worldwide.

"Nobody believes that the process was clean. Why does Sanral not reveal the details of the deal? This is a company owned and paid for by taxpayers."

sanral  |  vusi mona  |  winelands  |  tolls


Read Fin24’s Comments Policy publishes all comments posted on articles provided that they adhere to our Comments Policy. Should you wish to report a comment for editorial review, please do so by clicking the 'Report Comment' button to the right of each comment.

Comment on this story
Comments have been closed for this article.

Company Snapshot

Money Clinic

Money Clinic
Do you have a question about your finances? We'll get an expert opinion.
Click here...

Voting Booth

Do small independent businesses stand a chance against big corporates in SA?

Previous results · Suggest a vote