Matona has 'no idea' why he was suspended | Fin24
  • Load Shedding Schedules

    Find information for Johannesburg, Durban, Cape Town and other cities.

  • Govt Pension Fund

    The fund says it would be wrong to dismiss R250bn Eskom bailout proposal without all the facts.

  • Sovereign Wealth Fund

    Questions around the fund's scope & mandate remain unanswered, writes Dr. Malan Rietveld.


Matona has 'no idea' why he was suspended

Mar 26 2015 15:31
Poloko Tau

Johannesburg - Eskom’s suspended CEO Tshediso Matona hurriedly left the courtroom at the Labour Court in Braamfontein, Johannesburg after Judge Benita Witcher reserved judgment in his application to have the court set aside his suspension.

This follows a long day of arguments between Eskom and Matona, during which Matona's lawyers asked the court to agree that his suspension was unfair and unlawful and rule that he should return to work.

Matona’s lawyer Advocate Andrew Redding SC argued that in his suspension notice, his client was only informed that there was going to be an inquiry into the “possibility that power delivery may be compromised by intentional or negligent conduct”.

Redding said this after Eskom’s lawyer Advocate Paul Kennedy SC said there were indeed grounds for Matona’s suspension.

Kennedy said that as the chief executive of Eskom, Matona had not been helpful to the government’s War Room, the high-level task team headed by Deputy President Cyril Ramaphosa and which was formed to deal with power crisis. He added that Matona had frustrated their work.

He said the War Room has raised concerns about the "unreliable information" they were provided with by Eskom's management.

"This was frustrating the work of the board, trying to steer leadership. The War Room can't solve the problem because it is not getting adequate information," Kennedy said.

"In one month the CEO is saying that the financial position of Eskom is rosy, and next he said it was not good."

Kennedy said Matona was suspended after concerns raised by the board.

"There is the belief that the CEO has been negligent or derilict in providing reliable information to the war room. But (Matona) is saying now: 'Don't worry, send me back so I can continue providing unreliable information to the War Room," he said.

Matona, however, believes his suspension was unfair and unlawful and has asked the court to set it aside so that he could return to work.

Redding said Matona's suspension letter was probably "pre-written" before he was suspended on March 9.

He said his client had attend the meeting that day, knowing that the only item on the agenda was a proposed resolution for an independent inquiry into the affairs of Eskom.

"It is not clear as to why, if you are going to investigate the affairs of an organisation, you suspend executives," Redding said.
He said Matona was not furnished with clear reasons for his suspension.

Redding also submitted that Eskom flaunted its own disciplinary code of conduct and did not afford Matona an opportunity to defend himself.

"He was not given the right to be heard, understand the allegations against him, or be able to respond," he said.

Redding said there was no justifiable reason to think that if he stayed at work, Matona would interfere with the investigation into Eskom affairs.

He said Matona's reputation was suffering and his dignity was hurt as a result of his suspension.

“There is no demonstrable harm and reasons that if he returns to work Eskom would suffer massively economically and in terms of its reputation and functions,” Redding said.

Matona was also in court. He read through court papers and turned to pages directed to the court by his lawyer. He stood up during the tea break adjournment to chat to a woman and a man who had come to court to support him.

But after the lunch break, Matona appeared less relaxed and stared straight at Kennedy as he tore into his case. He folded his arms and then stretched them on the bench’s long backrest, but he did not once take his eyes off his employer's lawyer.

Meanwhile, the Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration has confirmed that a date will be set for a hearing after Matona approached it challenging his suspension which he believes is “unfair”.

eskom  |  tshediso matona  |  electricity


Read Fin24’s Comments Policy publishes all comments posted on articles provided that they adhere to our Comments Policy. Should you wish to report a comment for editorial review, please do so by clicking the 'Report Comment' button to the right of each comment.

Comment on this story
Comments have been closed for this article.

Company Snapshot

Voting Booth

How concerned are you about ransomware attacks?

Previous results · Suggest a vote