Share

Inside Labour: Why mining job losses are inevitable

LARGE-scale scale retrenchments in the mining sector, running to tens of thousands of jobs, are probably inevitable. But only because of the system in which we have to operate.

Even in the gold sector there will be mines and shafts that remain profitable without job losses, but each shaft and each mine will be considered separately. And, as further mechanisation is introduced, there will be less need for workers.

This stark reality was the basis of the crisis talks this week convened by Mines Minister Ngoako Ramatlhodi. But it is a case of better late than never because such talks, involving all parties, should have been held at least two or three years ago when it became obvious that a crisis was looming.

In the aftermath of Marikana in August 2012, renewed militancy among miners who demanded - and deserve - a decent living wage and better conditions meant that the cost to companies increased. However, it is the fiduciary duty of company directors to maximise profits for shareholders and that means, where possible, costs must be cut.

Since South Africa’s historically massively profitable mining industry was built on cheap labour, wages constitute the greatest cost. But when it becomes possible to operate by cheaper means, the system demands that jobs must go.

In reaction there have been calls by, among others, President Jacob Zuma for the mining companies to exercise “social responsibility”; in effect, to put the welfare of people before profits. But the system does not allow for this and it would probably be illegal and certainly actionable for companies to deprive their shareholders of dividends in order to retain unnecessary workers.

This is not a moral judgement, merely a statement of fact. The free market, capitalist system demands that profit be the only priority. As the late Milton Friedman, father of what is now labelled neo-liberalism, once noted: any company director who prioritises social responsibility should be sacked on the spot.

It's the bottom line that matters

In business, therefore, it is the bottom line that matters. This makes for an exploitative and potentially brutal system in human terms.

American legal expert Professor Joel Bakan made this clear in his book The Corporation, when he wrote that if people behaved in the way that corporations have to, they would be locked away as dangerous psychopaths. And he added the ironic fact that, in law, companies are legal persons.

It was this reality that gave rise to trade unions as reaction to a system in which workers could become mere disposable ciphers. As a result, we have what has often been described as a “constructive tension” between opposing interests in the workplace.

But in a parliamentary democracy governments are faced with having to perform a balancing act, needing both the tax and other revenues from companies and the voting support of workers. In South Africa, with local government elections looming, workers have a little more leverage with a government that still remains committed to maintaining the system of competition and the accumulation of profit.

This is the background to the crisis talks that tended to concentrate on the gold mining sector. Ramatlhodi will be desperate to have companies and unions strike a compromise that would avoid both a labour and capital strike.

Mining unions have the moral argument that during the boom times their members were not rewarded, while company executives and shareholders profited enormously. Now, at a time of economic pinch, companies wish to retrench their members.

However, for any honest compromise to be struck the gold producers will have to be candid and open about their bookkeeping. Transparency is called for because over the past decade gold prices, while fluctuating, have soared. At the same time, the exchange rate value of the US dollar to the rand has more than doubled.

What this means is that the gold price in 2005 reached a peak of $510 and averaged less than $500 when $1 bought R6.  This week the gold price was $1 096 while $1 was worth R12.70. In rand terms, what this means is that ten years ago, gold earned roughly R3 000 an ounce; today more than R12 000. And the overwhelming bulk of mining costs is in rands, the income in dollars.

However, appropriate rates of pay and decent conditions for miners have, in many instances, become more expensive than machines. So the march of mechanisation will continue. And that means jobs will be lost, never to return, even if commodity prices rise.

* Add your voice to this and/or the big labour debate or simply ask Terry a labour question.

* Terry Bell is a political, economic and labour analyst. Views expressed are his own. Follow him on twitter @telbelsa.


We live in a world where facts and fiction get blurred
Who we choose to trust can have a profound impact on our lives. Join thousands of devoted South Africans who look to News24 to bring them news they can trust every day. As we celebrate 25 years, become a News24 subscriber as we strive to keep you informed, inspired and empowered.
Join News24 today
heading
description
username
Show Comments ()
Rand - Dollar
18.99
-0.5%
Rand - Pound
23.95
-0.2%
Rand - Euro
20.50
-0.1%
Rand - Aus dollar
12.35
+0.0%
Rand - Yen
0.13
-0.4%
Platinum
896.95
-1.0%
Palladium
1,000.11
-0.2%
Gold
2,192.73
-0.1%
Silver
24.45
-0.8%
Brent-ruolie
86.09
-0.2%
Top 40
67,991
+0.5%
All Share
74,199
+0.4%
Resource 10
56,296
+1.1%
Industrial 25
103,587
+0.3%
Financial 15
16,547
+0.1%
All JSE data delayed by at least 15 minutes Iress logo
Company Snapshot
Editorial feedback and complaints

Contact the public editor with feedback for our journalists, complaints, queries or suggestions about articles on News24.

LEARN MORE
Government tenders

Find public sector tender opportunities in South Africa here.

Government tenders
This portal provides access to information on all tenders made by all public sector organisations in all spheres of government.
Browse tenders