Silicosis ruling not on merit - mine companies | Fin24
 
In partnership with
  • Load Shedding Schedules

    Find information for Johannesburg, Durban, Cape Town and other cities.

  • Govt Pension Fund

    The fund says it would be wrong to dismiss R250bn Eskom bailout proposal without all the facts.

  • Sovereign Wealth Fund

    Questions around the fund's scope & mandate remain unanswered, writes Dr. Malan Rietveld.

Loading...

Silicosis ruling not on merit - mine companies

May 13 2016 14:10
Carin Smith

(iStock)

Company Data

ANGLO AMERICAN PLC [JSE:AGL]

Last traded 415
Change 0
% Change 0
Cumulative volume 2248336
Market cap 0

Last Updated: 01/01/0001 at 12:00. Prices are delayed by 15 minutes. Source: McGregor BFA

GOLD FIELDS LIMITED [JSE:GFI]

Last traded 114
Change 7
% Change 6
Cumulative volume 6380254
Market cap 0

Last Updated: 01/01/0001 at 12:00. Prices are delayed by 15 minutes. Source: McGregor BFA

ANGLOGOLD ASHANTI LIMITED [JSE:ANG]

Last traded 338
Change 21
% Change 7
Cumulative volume 1876444
Market cap 0

Last Updated: 01/01/0001 at 12:00. Prices are delayed by 15 minutes. Source: McGregor BFA

Related Articles

Silicosis: Landmark judgment for mineworkers

18% drop in mining output huge shock for SA economy - economist

Glencore has good news for metal bulls doubting rally

Commodity rout hits home as SA records output drop

Glencore CEO lists mining's mistakes after $1trn spree

 

Johannesburg - It is important to note that the court finding enabling a silicosis class action suit by 69 claimants against 32 South African mining companies does not represent a view on the merits of the case brought by claimants.

This is the collective response on behalf of six mining companies to what some regard as a landmark judgment by the South Gauteng High Court. The ruling now makes it possible for former mineworkers to proceed with a class action seeking damages from mining companies for lung diseases they contracted while working at their operations.

The court found sufficient common cause to justify a class action for silicosis and tuberculosis. The mining companies are accused of failing to protect the health of the employees when, it is claimed, they were legally bound to do so. As a result, they are alleged to have caused the mine workers to contract TB and silicosis.

A class action trial would therefore deal with all the evidence simultaneously, in what is regarded as the largest class action ever to be certified in SA.

A collective statement on behalf of the Occupational Lung Disease Working Group - representing African Rainbow Minerals [JSE:ARI], Anglo American [JSE:AGL], AngloGold Ashanti [JSE:ANG], Harmony [JSE:HAR] and Sibanye Gold [JSE:SGL] - states that the companies are studying the court’s decision.

Each company is yet to decide whether to lodge an appeal against the finding.

READ: Silicosis: Landmark judgment for mineworkers

"The companies remain of the view that there are issues related to compensation and medical care for occupational lung disease that need to be addressed through engagement between stakeholders, with a view to designing and implementing a comprehensive solution that is both fair to past, present and future gold mining employees, and also sustainable for the sector," according to the statement.

"They, therefore, remain committed to achieving these goals."

The working group and its members indicated they will not comment further on the matter until they have studied the full judgment properly.

On March 5 this year, 4 365 former gold miners and relatives of deceased former miners reached a settlement with Anglo American SA and AngloGold Ashanti on claims instituted in 2012 for dust-related lung diseases, silicosis and silico-tuberculosis, which they claim were contracted from working in unsafe conditions in the mines. These claims were completely separate from the latest silicosis class action proceedings.



harmony  |  anglo amercian  |  mining  |  silicosis
NEXT ON FIN24X

 
 
 
 

Company Snapshot

Voting Booth

How concerned are you about ransomware attacks?

Previous results · Suggest a vote

Loading...