New Mining Charter to credit past black empowerment deals | Fin24
 
  • Eskom capacity

    Eskom faces structural problems - its ability to supply power is at its lowest in years.

  • Gordhan's testimony

    Here are six quotes that summed up the hottest moments at the inquiry.

  • Labour trends

    Here's where you're most likely to find a job.

Loading...

New Mining Charter to credit past black empowerment deals

Jun 16 2018 08:00
Felix Njini and Paul Burkhardt, Bloomberg

South Africa will give mining companies credit for past black-empowerment deals even when the investors later sold their shares to whites or foreigners, removing a major concern for the industry.

The country’s new Mining Charter, which is aimed at distributing South Africa’s mineral wealth more widely, will apply the “once empowered, always empowered” principle as long they met the previous 26% black-ownership requirement. The minimum percentage will also be increased to 30% within five years of the new set of rules taking effect.

Mineral Resources Minister Gwede Mantashe has held months of talks with companies, unions and mining communities on an update to the regulations after a version published last year by his predecessor, Mosebenzi Zwane, drew furious opposition and legal challenges from the industry.

The Mining Charter, introduced in 2004, laid out rules and targets for areas such as black ownership to help to redress economic inequalities stemming from white-minority rule under apartheid. It was also updated in 2010.

For new mining rights, the minimum 30% black ownership requirement includes a 5% free-carried interest and 3% financed interest each for workers and mining communities, according to the draft, which was published for public comment before being finalised. The remaining 14% is for black investors.

The Minerals Council South Africa, formerly known as the Chamber of Mines, said it will take time to study the document but that it’s against the free-carry provision, which will hurt prospects for new investment in mining and reduce the profitability of future developments.

New mining right holders also must pay 1% of earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortisation to employees and communities. That’s a change from last year’s version, which required companies to pay at least 1% of annual revenue to black shareholders.

The recognition of the “once-empowered, always empowered” principal comes after the industry won a court ruling in April that the first two versions of the charter didn’t require producers to top up black-shareholding levels in perpetuity if they previously met the minimum level.

“The recognition of continuing consequences shall include historical transactions concluded on units of production, share assets” including all historical black economic empowerment transactions which formed the basis upon which new order mining rights were granted, according to the draft.

The council said last year that the charter produced in 2017, drafted by former minister Zwane threatened as many as 100 000 jobs.

Tensions have eased between government and industry since President Cyril Ramaphosa, who appointed Mantashe in February, said he wants to resolve the impasse over the charter and convinced the council to suspend its legal challenge to Zwane’s document.

Other provisions of the new charter include at least 50% of directors and 50% of top management must be black. At least 70% of the mining-goods procurement budget must be spent on South African manufactured goods, with a 60% local-content value. At least 80% of the money spent on services must be to South African companies.

* Sign up to Fin24's top news in your inbox: SUBSCRIBE TO FIN24 NEWSLETTER

Follow Fin24 on Twitter, Facebook, Google+ and Pinterest. 24.com encourages commentary submitted via MyNews24. Contributions of 200 words or more will be considered for publication.

NEXT ON FIN24X

 
 
 
 

Company Snapshot

Money Clinic

Money Clinic
Do you have a question about your finances? We'll get an expert opinion.
Click here...

Voting Booth

Was Momentum fair when rejecting R2.4m insurance claim?

Previous results · Suggest a vote

Loading...