Why must the poor fund Kusile, asks body

Jan 31 2013 11:26

Electricity pylons in Beaufort West. Nersa is holding public hearings on Eskom's proposed revenue price determination. (Picture: Chris Kirchhoff/MCSA)

Related Articles

Eskom hike could spark violent protests

Protester: Eskom hikes killing us

Eskom's proposed hike 'meaningless'

Nersa needs govt help - expert

Farmers fret over Eskom 16% hike

Eskom hike to hit municipalities hard

Johannesburg -  The success of Eskom's previous Multi-Year Price Determinations (MYPD) was questioned on the second day of National Energy Regulator of SA (Nersa) hearings in Midrand on Thursday.

"The Nersa panel should ask why, if the first two MYPD's had failed to reach their objectives, the third one would be any different," said Landless People's Movement representative Moshe Thebola.

"What made those two fail, and what makes you think this one won't fail?" he asked.

The Nersa panel, chaired by Thembani Bukula, is gathering views on Eskom's request for a 16% increase in electricity prices each year for the next five years (known as MYPD3).

The proposal will more than double the price of electricity in five years, taking it from 61 cents a kilowatt hour (kWh) in 2012/13, to 128 cents a kWh in 2017/18.

Thebola said a price hike would most affect those people already struggling to make ends meet.

"MYPD3 is a way for the poor to pay for the Kusile plant," he said, in reference to Eskom's second most advanced coal-fired power plant, based in Mpumalanga.

Criticising Nersa for holding the hearings in Midrand, Thebola said: "A public hearing is meant for the public... You should have gone to the people."

He said it was the people expected to pay for electricity who did not understand anything about tariffs and Eskom's policies.

He advised that Eskom relook at its MYPD3 proposal.

"I'm not saying we don't want to pay, but 16% is too much.

"This issue will truly provoke people and it will lead them to look for other options [to get electricity]," he said.

Asked about electricity theft, another speaker, Jacob Kganedi, of the Soweto Electricity Crisis Committee, denied that people there stole electricity.

He said they encountered "boastful" Eskom employees when they went to its offices to enquire about electricity cut-offs.

Kganedi said the committee was against the building of nuclear plants, and that the only beneficiaries would be educated foreign engineers with experience in running the plants

On Monday, Eskom finance director Paul O'Flaherty said it needed the increase to, among other things, maintain revenue and cover operating costs.

He said that if Eskom merely minimised operating costs, as had been suggested, the servicing of machinery would be neglected and there would have to be massive staff reductions.

Protests were scheduled outside the hearing venue on Thursday, but no protesters had arrived by 9:00. Around 100 people demonstrated there on Wednesday.

Follow Fin24 on Twitter, Facebook, Google+ and Pinterest.

eskom  |  electricity price increases



Read Fin24’s Comments Policy

24.com publishes all comments posted on articles provided that they adhere to our Comments Policy. Should you wish to report a comment for editorial review, please do so by clicking the 'Report Comment' button to the right of each comment.

Comment on this story
Comments have been closed for this article.

Company Snapshot

We're talking about: STEINHOFF

Steinhoff International, once the darling of fund managers, risks falling out of the JSE top 100.

Money Clinic

Money Clinic
Do you have a question about your finances? We'll get an expert opinion.
Click here...

Voting Booth

If SARB keeps interest rates the same this afternoon, how will this affect your personal finances?

Previous results · Suggest a vote