Google curbs forced arbitration after protest on harassment | Fin24
In partnership with
  • Deloitte

    The accounting firm has denied allegations of corruption related to Eskom contracts.

  • SAA Uncertainty

    What you need to know if you have a ticket or intend to buy one.

  • Michael Jordaan

    Forget Matric results - here's how to prepare your kids for jobs that don't yet exist.


Google curbs forced arbitration after protest on harassment

Nov 11 2018 07:15
Gerrit De Vynck, Josh Eidelson and Rebecca Greenfield, Bloomberg

Google changed some policies on sexual misconduct after thousands of employees walked out of their offices last week to protest big payouts for executives accused of harassment and other misbehaviour.

The Alphabet unit is making arbitration optional for individual sexual harassment and sexual assault claims. It also pledged to provide more information to staff about such investigations and the outcomes, and expand mandatory training on the issue, addressing some of the issue’s workers asked for in staging the walkout.

"Going forward, we will provide more transparency on how we handle concerns. We’ll give better support and care to the people who raise them. And we will double down on our commitment to be a representative, equitable, and respectful workplace," Google chief executive officer Sundar Pichai wrote in a public message to employees on Thursday.

The company is holding a town hall staff meeting on sexual harassment on Thursday.

Adjusting to responsibilities

After years as a free-wheeling, fast-growing startup, Google is trying to adjust to the responsibilities and realities of being one of the world’s most powerful companies. That’s happening externally, with increased scrutiny by regulators and politicians, and internally with reports and rising complaints about Google’s permissive culture when it comes to executive conduct and relationships with co-workers.

The changes are a step forward, but have some serious shortcomings, said Freada Kapor Klein, a partner at Kapor Capital and longtime advocate for diversity in tech.

"It hasn’t ended arbitration, it’s made it optional," she said. The rule change also doesn’t appear to extend to workplace racism, which women of colour are just as likely to experience as sexism, Kapor Klein said.

Ending forced arbitration

The Google protest organisers last week demanded the end of forced arbitration in harassment and discrimination cases, which requires employees to resolve their dispute privately rather than in court.

Mandatory arbitration clauses have come under harsh scrutiny as the #metoo movement has gathered steam over the past year.

In February, the attorney generals of all 50 states issued a rare joint letter urging legislation to ensure victims of sexual harassment have the option of a day in court. Some states, including California, this year passed laws that limit the use of non-disclosure agreements in sexual misconduct cases. The California governor, however, vetoed a bill that would have restricted arbitration.

Forced arbitration for harassment claims is still standard practice at major employers, according to Orly Lobel, a labour and employment law professor at the University of San Diego.

Last December, Microsoft announced that it had eliminated mandatory arbitration clauses for sexual harassment claims among its employees and was also advocating for federal legislation to do the same across the workforce.

"Forced arbitration is one of the ills that we understand keeps sexual harassment in place by concealing the nature of the allegations, and it is a completely one-sided system that favours corporations," said civil rights attorney Debra Katz, a partner at the law firm Katz, Marshall & Banks.

"If we as a society care about eradicating sexual harassment, we need to continue to pressure companies to get rid of these policies, because it’s not happening at either the court level or the legislative level now."

Other demands

Other worker demands included the creation of a single, clear system to anonymously report harassment and a promise that the chief diversity officer would report directly to the CEO.

Pichai committed to several of those changes, but a request to have an employee representative appointed to the board was not addressed. Instead, Google noted that its chief diversity officer provides recommendations to the board through a committee.

Workers’ advocates aren’t convinced. The changes don’t fully extend to Google contractors, who make up a massive part of the company’s workforce, said a spokesperson for the Tech Workers Coalition, which represents employees and contractors from different tech companies.

Google said it investigates whenever a contractor makes a complaint against a Google employee, and expects contracting companies to do the same when a complaint is made against a contractor.

Here’s what Google is committed to:

• Making arbitration in sexual harassment and assault claims optional.

• Providing regular, detailed reports about the number of harassment claims and whether they resulted in people being fired.

• Publishing an internal guide to how harassment investigations work at the company.

• More support for people reporting harassment, including the right to bring a colleague along with them to meetings with the human resources department.

• Managers will be expected to discourage "excessive" alcohol consumption at work-related events.

• Skipping sexual harassment training will affect employees’ performance reviews.

* Sign up to Fin24's top news in your inbox: SUBSCRIBE TO FIN24 NEWSLETTER

google  |  ict  |  companies


Company Snapshot

Voting Booth

How concerned are you about ransomware attacks?

Previous results · Suggest a vote