Telkom mulling over tribunal judgment

2012-08-08 09:07

Johannesburg - Telecommunications provider Telkom [JSE:TKG] said on Tuesday it was still studying a judgment by the Competition Tribunal which found it guilty of abusing its dominance in the telecommunications market between 1999 and 2004 and slapped it with a hefty R449m penalty.

“Telkom is currently in the process of studying the judgment and its implications‚ and if necessary a follow-up announcement in this regard will be considered in due course‚” the telecoms group said in a response to the verdict which saw its shares dive more than 3% in mid-morning trade before recovering.

Announcing its judgment on Tuesday morning‚ the tribunal concluded that Telkom leveraged its upstream monopoly in the facilities market to advantage its own subsidiary in the competitive value added network market.

“Telkom's conduct caused harm to both competitors and consumers alike and impeded competition and innovation in the dynamic VANS market.

"Half of the penalty is to be paid within 6 months of the Tribunal’s decision while the balance is payable within 12 months thereafter.”

The Competition Commission had asked the tribunal to impose an administrative penalty of R3.5bn. The commission wanted the fine to act as a deterrent for excessive pricing by other dominant companies.

The commission asked for an additional fine of R1bn for Telkom's refusal to give a competitor access to an essential facility.

The case against Telkom started in 2002 when value-added network service providers accused Telkom of exclusionary conduct and price discrimination.

More than 20 companies‚ including Internet Solutions‚ and the South African Value-added Network Services Association complained to the commission about Telkom’s conduct.

The case was referred to the tribunal in 2004‚ but hearings only began at the end of last year after several challenges to the competition authorities’ jurisdiction.

The service providers alleged that Telkom was denying them access to telecommunications infrastructure that would enable them to offer clients value-added services such as e-mail‚ internet access‚ protocol conversions and video conferencing.

*Follow Fin24 on Facebook, Twitter and Google+.


  • sisie.indola - 2012-08-08 09:47

    Of course they are mulling over the judgement - that means they will not be able to get bonuses, nor will they get their 33% increases, and never mind the parties they won't be able to have now. Ag shame my heart bleeds custard.

  • mnbain - 2012-08-08 09:53

    The times scale that this case has taken is shocking!!! The CEO has changed, the primary investor that was driving policy has long since taken its money and run... Nothing more than further government theft. This does nothing to increase competition and the costs will most likely be past on to the consumers anyhoot.

  • pages:
  • 1