Why fewer large banks are good (and bad) for SA - SARB | Fin24
 
  • Data Market Inquiry

    MTN says it is prepared to defend itself before Competition Tribunal over report.

  • Claims of sabotage

    What we know so far about allegations of sabotage at an Eskom power station.

  • Dudu Myeni

    Court dismisses former SAA chiar's bid to have Outa withdraw from delinquency case.

Loading...

Why fewer large banks are good (and bad) for SA - SARB

Mar 22 2017 10:42
Liesl Peyper


Company Data

FIRSTRAND LIMITED [JSE:FSR]

Last traded 64
Change 2
% Change 4
Cumulative volume 8514407
Market cap 0

Last Updated: 01/01/0001 at 12:00. Prices are delayed by 15 minutes. Source: McGregor BFA

CAPITEC BANK HOLDINGS LIMITED [JSE:CPI]

Last traded 1462
Change 62
% Change 4
Cumulative volume 206263
Market cap 0

Last Updated: 01/01/0001 at 12:00. Prices are delayed by 15 minutes. Source: McGregor BFA

ABSA Bank Ltd Pref [JSE:ABSP]

Last traded 745
Change 5
% Change 1
Cumulative volume 2642
Market cap 0

Last Updated: 01/01/0001 at 12:00. Prices are delayed by 15 minutes. Source: McGregor BFA

Related Articles

LIVE: Code does not advance radical economic transformation - Ntuli

Why the SARB should be nationalised - analyst

Business Leadership SA supports banks investigtion

We're sound - SA banks react to risk ranking

Bank CEOs in Parliament face transformation scrutiny

Big banks laud transformation triumphs

 

Cape Town – There are particular advantages to having a small number of large banks, such as in South Africa, said Kuben Naidoo, deputy governor of the South African Reserve Bank (SARB) on Wednesday.

The SARB is one of the stakeholders making submissions to Parliament during public hearings on transformation in the financial services sector.

“One of the advantages to having four large banks is that there’s more resilience in the event of a financial crisis,” Naidoo said. “It also means these banks are well capitalised, and they didn’t suffer to the same extent as other financial institutions during the 2008 financial crisis.”

Naidoo acknowledged though that the dominance of the biggest banks – Absa [JSE:ABSP], Nedbank [JSE:NED], FirstRand [JSE:FSR], Standard Bank [JSE:SBK], Capitec [JSE:CPI] and Investec [JSE:INP] – pose “competition risks”, such as anti-competitive behaviour.

He added that concentration also creates a situation where the banks are “too big to fail”, which poses a risk of contagion. “If they do then fail, governments can’t bail them out,” Naidoo said.

Naidoo explained there has been a significant drop in the number of banks in South Africa since 1994, when there were 40. “Today there are only 16 and the five biggest banks in South Africa hold a 91% market share.”

According to Naidoo, there’s a “dichotomy” between stability and competition. “Although concentration brings about financial stability, it can also lead to less competition.”

Naidoo said the SARB plays an important role as an effective and prudential supervisor that has ensured stability in the banking system.

He also pointed out that though market dominance is relevant for competition, it is not necessarily indicative of the “absence” of competition in a particular sector.

Read Fin24's top stories trending on Twitter:

absa  |  capitec  |  standard bank  |  nedbank  |  sarb  |  firstrand  |  banks  |  financial services
NEXT ON FIN24X

 
 
 
 

Company Snapshot

Voting Booth

How concerned are you about ransomware attacks?

Previous results · Suggest a vote

Loading...