No dropping of rand-rigging charges, says Bonakele | Fin24
  • Load Shedding

    Find the latest load shedding schedules for Joburg, Durban, Cape Town, and other cities.

  • Peter Moyo

    The former Old Mutual CEO says he wants its directors jailed for six months without option of a fine.

  • Fin24’s newsletter

    Sign up to receive Fin24's top news in your inbox every morning.


No dropping of rand-rigging charges, says Bonakele

Jun 27 2017 21:59
Renee Bonorchis, Bloomberg News

Johannesburg - The Competition Commission said it’s continuing with charges against all banks named in its rand-rigging probe after Standard Bank earlier said allegations would be withdrawn against some of the institutions.

Standard Bank general counsel Ian Sinton said in an emailed response to questions on Tuesday that the Competition Commission would revoke its complaint against some lenders and may accuse other banks of collusion and manipulation of currency trades instead.

READ: Rand-rigging scandal: Some banks dropped, others to be charged

Standard Bank misunderstood what happened at a closed hearing on Friday, according to Competition Commissioner Thembinkosi Bonakele.

“There’s no truth at all that we may withdraw any allegations against any banks,” Bonakele said in an interview on Johannesburg-based Radio 702. “It’s an error. It doesn’t mean we’ll never press any new charges against any other banks.”

Fourteen banking entities, including HSBC Holdings, BNP Paribas SA, Credit Suisse Group AG and JPMorgan Chase & Co. were named by the commission in February as having been allegedly involved in illegal rand trades. Barclays Africa Group was exempt because it blew the whistle on the traders’ alleged actions while Citigroup Inc. agreed to pay a R69.5m ($5.4m) fine for its alleged role.

Some of the banks said in legal documents in May that the commission’s complaint was vague and embarrassing, and demanded it be amended or dropped. Some of the lenders also said that there were no allegations that the banks carried out prohibited practices within South Africa or if they had any effect in the country, arguing that the antitrust regulator therefore had no jurisdiction. BNP Paribas at the time criticised the commission for saying that a defendant represented Standard Bank’s New York unit and Barclays at the same time.

Ross Linstrom, spokesperson for Standard Bank, didn’t immediately reply to a text, phone message or an email seeking the lender’s response to the commissioner’s statements. The bank, which was among those named in February, declined earlier to say which lenders may be removed and which could be added.

JPMorgan, Credit Suisse and Commerzbank AG declined to comment and Investec Plc said it couldn’t immediately comment. Standard Chartered didn’t immediately respond to emailed questions.

“The foreign-exchange litigation is on track and we are fairly content with how things are unfolding,” Competition Commission spokesperson Sipho Ngwema said in an emailed response to questions earlier Tuesday.

The commission in February recommended the banks be fined 10% of the revenue from their foreign-exchange units. Aside from using a common trading platform, holding meetings and discussing strategy over the phone, the traders had an instant messaging chatroom called “ZAR Domination” where they would agree on their currency trades, the regulator said.

According to Standard Bank’s Sinton, representatives of the accused banks and the Competition Commission agreed June 23 to cancel formal hearings scheduled to start on July 20 so that the regulator has time to amend its complaint.

Read Fin24's top stories trending on Twitter:

competition commission  |  currencies  |  rand  |  banks


Company Snapshot


Struggling power utility Eskom will take centre stage at this year's mini budget

Money Clinic

Money Clinic
Do you have a question about your finances? We'll get an expert opinion.
Click here...

Voting Booth

What do you think about private healthcare in SA?

Previous results · Suggest a vote