Gordhan’s private equity poser

2013-02-20 11:49
Pravin Gordhan
Minister of Finance Pravin Gordhan.
Cape Town - Budget speech time is rapidly approaching and taxpayers will be looking to Minister of Finance Pravin Gordhan for details on how he plans to fill government coffers for the 2013 fiscal year.

With the National Development Plan (NDP) top of mind, the roll-out of the National Health Insurance pilot sites imminent and the proposed introduction of a youth wage subsidy gaining momentum, Gordhan will have to find ways to improve tax collection, says Lesley Isherwood, associate director, Corporate Tax at KPMG.
As part of efforts to bolster tax revenues, the budget speech is likely - in part - to reflect a continued focus on regulating transactions that erode South Africa’s tax base.

Leveraged buy-out deals have been high on the list of transactions that have attracted scrutiny in the pa.st few years. These transactions are often characterised by significant levels of gearing and accompanying interest deductions.

The interest deductions result in large assessed losses being racked up by businesses that were in a taxpaying position prior to the buyout. Where the interest is payable to non–residents, or to residents with a low effective tax rate, the deductions claimed by the borrower exceed the interest taxed in the hands of the lender and the fiscus is worse off.

Legislation was introduced in 2011 to curb these losses. It requires taxpayers entering into so-called reorganisation transactions to obtain the taxman's approval on the extent to which an interest deduction can be claimed.

But the law applies only to transactions entered into on or after the effective date of the section (June 3 2011 or August 3 2011, depending on the type of reorganisation transaction) and so does nothing to stop the tax leakage stemming from the spate of leveraged buyouts that occurred before these dates.

A number of these transactions were funded by a combination of senior debt and payment-in-kind notes (Piks) listed on foreign bond exchanges. Piks generally attract a high interest yield, coupled with an equity return. Interest on Piks is often only settled on maturity of the instrument.

Interest deductions claimed in relation to foreign sourced senior debt and Piks is of concern to treasury, and the hybrid nature of the Piks has drawn particular attention.

The 15% withholding tax on interest payable to non-residents, which will come into effect on July 1 2013, may offer some protection to the tax base. However, provisions make allowance for an exemption in relation to debts listed on a recognised exchange.

These exchanges include those on which many of the senior secured notes and Piks are listed. So, interest payable on these instruments would be exempt from withholding tax on interest and so remain a drain on the fiscus.

One solution would be to review the list of exchanges recognised for purposes of the withholding tax, and exclude those where the offending instruments are listed.

But any such action may have the effect of excluding non-targeted instruments from the withholding tax relief and could have a negative effect on foreign investment in the South African bond market.

The second and more likely solution is to revisit the provisions in the Income Tax Act that have the effect of tainting the interest return on so-called hybrid debt instruments.

The first draft of the 2012 taxation laws amendment bill proposed far-reaching changes to the hybrid debt rules, which could have the effect of deeming Piks to be equity instruments rather than debt, and in this way eliminating any interest deduction the Pik’s issuer could obtain.

But the proposed amendments were overly broad and inadvertently caught non-offending debt instruments in their net. The National Treasury therefore shelved the proposed amendments.

The intention behind the amendments was, however, consistent with a further trend whereby the legislators aim to ensure that the tax treatment of debt and equity instruments follows their economic substance rather than their legal form.

This can be achieved through careful tweaking of the 2012 proposal.

Any attempt by treasury to limit the interest deductions in relation to historical transactions could have a far-reaching economic impact that must be balanced with the immediate need for tax collection.

Due consideration must be given to the common inclusion of gross up clauses in funding agreements.

Any additional costs associated with a change in legislation will inevitably be borne by the issuer and these companies, already burdened with high interest bills, could be crippled by the costs brought on by the gross up clauses.

Treasury should also consider the economic impact of the approval process for reorganisation introduced in 2011.

Where the South African Revenue Service does grant an interest deduction on foreign funding, the percentage allowed is a fraction of the overall interest charge.

Companies embarking on reorganisation transactions are disincentivised to source foreign debt, so the country ultimately loses out on much-needed foreign investment.

All this means that the 2013 budget requires a careful balancing act by Gordhan. It is a sure thing though that funding the various facets of the National Development Plan are going to result in increased collection efforts by Sars, so taxpayers will need to be increasingly vigilant of their compliance with tax legislation.

And given the complex and ever-changing nature of tax legislation, skilled tax professionals play an important role in guiding taxpayers.

 - Fin24

* Visit our 2013 Budget section for full coverage of Finance Minister Pravin Gordhan's National Budget speech.

Read Fin24’s Comments Policy

24.com publishes all comments posted on articles provided that they adhere to our Comments Policy. Should you wish to report a comment for editorial review, please do so by clicking the 'Report Comment' button to the right of each comment.

Comment on this story
Comments have been closed for this article.