'Blackout towns' named

A leaked document shows that a number of municipalities are not paying their Eskom accounts and may end up without electricity.

Old Gs never die

Leave the grandstanding to the G20 - the G7 is where the real talking gets done, says CNN International Correspondent Richard Quest.
Where am I? Fin24.com  > 

Fitch: SA risks hard landing

Nov 10 2008 21:54 Evan Pickworth

Johannesburg - Global ratings agency Fitch Ratings said during a teleconference on Monday afternoon that its outlook downgrade to negative for SA was largely related to the extent of its current account gap at a time when supply to emerging markets becomes "much reduced".

Head of Sovereign Ratings for Europe, the Middle East and Africa, Brian Coulton, said it was very much a "prospective signal" as the country had not to date been directly affected by the global credit crisis.

He says Fitch foresees a current account gap of -8% in 2009 in SA. The National Treasury has it at -7.8%.

"SA built up significant imbalances before the shock," he said, noting that the current account deficit of -8% increases risks of a "hard landing" in 2009.

"Inflation [13%] is also very high relative to the [3-6%] target and could be kept high due to the [weak] rand," he added.

"It will be relatively difficult for the Reserve Bank to cut interest rates aggressively," he pointed out.

Coulton also noted that SA's political transition created risks as up until now the macro-economic framework had been one of the country's key strengths.

"There is an increasing risk that political risk on that regime will increase," he said.

Global head of Fitch's Sovereign Ratings, David Riley, said in answer to a question that "the world has moved on since June" [when Fitch changed its outlook for SA from positive to stable].

"The length of time we are expecting the global credit markets to be under significant pressure is much longer than before."

He added in answer to a question from the SA Treasury that the decision was "not a statement about the policy measures that have been taken to date". Treasury had earlier criticised the move as overlooking certain material facts about the macro-economic and fiscal frameworks and that flows were still coming into the country.

"The macro policies in SA have been an important support," said Riley, also pointing to the stability of the banking system and the lack of currency mismatches in the private sector.

However, he emphasized: "SA has one of the largest financing gaps of any of the emerging markets we looked at in this rating review."

"This is a key point as we do see tensions in policymaking - we forecast an 8% current account deficit next year."

"It is very simple - the risk of a sharp economic adjustment has gone up," said Riley.

He also raised concerns about SA meeting the implied reduction in domestic spending that will be required to reduce the gap.

Riley concluded by saying that he felt forecasts of 3% growth were optimistic: "1% to 2% economic growth in SA in 2009 will be a good outcome."

- I-Net Bridge

 

Add your comment

(No bad language or hate speech, please)

Comments Order    

,,,
Nov 14 2008 00:46 Report this comment

,,,
 
KoosS
Nov 12 2008 06:27 Report this comment

Kevyn, I'm not sure where you get your numbers from: US and Europe have about the same size GDP, so it is impossible for US to have 77% of the world's GDP. Also forecasts are generally that China will overtake US in the next 50 years - highly unlikely that China will more than triple their size in the next 50 years. And if the overdue USD/Yuan correction occurs, it might be even sooner. The American economy is hollowed out, and the twin deficits will catch up with them sooner or later.
 
Kevyn
Nov 11 2008 22:09 Report this comment

David , you misread me , I am not a fan of the US. I am saying its big & powerful and we are all dependant on it , even China relies on US markets for its manufactures. We should not wish for its collapse . Much of our macro resrch data is from the World Bank & domestic Stats offices in target countries . We r Asset Managers for a Singapore based investment & Pvt equity consortium . We have equity investments in your country in Resources, Oil refinfing, & construction & SA Govt Bonds.
 
David
Nov 11 2008 11:29 Report this comment

To Kevyn in Auckland NZ continued: The U.S sent the CIA after the Venezuelan Pres , I think you are past your bedtime down under "mate". Clearly the grass isn’t greener on the other side and if so it is because their more manure in use. You make typical analytic comments because you only look from 1 perspective / one sided. The fact is that the U.S knew they were in the SH1T as far back 2001. They tried to buy their way out. Who prints U.S dollars the banks or the GOV. Sound rating my rear end!!!!
 
David
Nov 11 2008 11:17 Report this comment

To Kevyn in Auckland NZ. Where do you get the U.S stats from? The same people that struck the deal with OPEC? Catch a wake-up wave my friend. They saved themselves 10 years ago convincing OPEC to trade in $. What happened awhile back when France wanted to exchange their $ reserves for gold? Do know the real reason for attacking Saddam? He refused the selling of their oil in dollars. He chose Euro's. What did the U.S try and do to Venezuelan Pres. when he also chose another currency for their oil
 
pessimist
Nov 11 2008 09:42 Report this comment

Hard landing....any different from a CRASH?
 
Kevyn(Auckland NZ)
Nov 11 2008 09:31 Report this comment

TonyCT, dont knock the US too hard just yet , they still produce 77% of the WORLD'S GDP down from 80% and their economy is still amazingly 3 times bigger than China's . Its got a long way to go to the total collpase that everyone is suggesting. It still has over 90% employment .(SA is about 55%). I recently visited California and there is no evidence of any recession there. Here in New Zealand we are already in a recession (two quarters of negative growth), and you can feel it everywhere.
 
Jo
Nov 11 2008 09:31 Report this comment

No! Apartheid again? Never! But, let's face it, BEE and AA are vestiges of precisely that abhorrent practice. Be that as it may, we will pay for living high off the hog; we will pay for trying to fly too high, too quickly. Even as a supporter of the FIFA World Cup, I must admit my dismay at the cost of the stadiums and the interminable escalations. And what about the arms deal that is also impoverishing us? No, we will pay in many, many ways....
 
 
Your name  
Email  
Comment
(500 characters remaining)
 

 
Please enter the text below(Case sensitive)
 
 
If you can see the following field, please ignore it, as it is used to verify that you are human.

 
  Disclaimer

Fin24.com encourages freedom of speech and the expression of diverse views. The views of users published on Fin24.com are therefore their own and do not represent the views of Fin24.com. All posts are monitored by Fin24.com's editors and grossly derogatory posts will be deleted. The Fin24.com editorial team will delete your comment should you post abusive comments, use vulgar language or make discriminatory observations.

Company Snapshot

Video

5 questions with John Munro
2010/02/08 05:25:00 PM

Fin24.com spoke to the Rand Uranium CEO at the 2010 Mining Indaba about the company's planned R3.5bn plant. Time: 2:08

Search engine friendly content

Blogs

Podcasts