'Blackout towns' named

A leaked document shows that a number of municipalities are not paying their Eskom accounts and may end up without electricity.

Old Gs never die

Leave the grandstanding to the G20 - the G7 is where the real talking gets done, says CNN International Correspondent Richard Quest.
Where am I? Fin24.com  > Economy

Eskom monopoly could end

May 19 2008 12:24

Johannesburg - The National Energy Regulator of SA (Nersa) has recommended new private power generation capacity and independent power producers to be managed independently of Eskom as a means of solving the country's power crisis.


Nersa, in a report released on Monday, also suggested co-generation partnerships.


It suggested that the government's National Electricity Emergency Programme, including the Power Conservation Programme, be coordinated and led by a centralised high-level government unit with authority to take action.


According to Eskom, the high unplanned maintenance and load losses, combined with the usual high planned maintenance of generating units, poor coal quality, wet coal and low stockpile levels were to blame for South Africa's recent outages.


The report found that inadequate primary energy procurement and power station production planning affected coal stockpiles, which were allowed to decline to unacceptably low levels.


This was compounded by a reluctance to obtain supplementary coal due to its high cost and its impact on Eskom's financial position.


Nersa said although Eskom had anticipated the current growth rate, the implementation of measures to provide for this growth were inadequate and slow.


There were delays in bringing mothballed power plants back online, and the implementation of energy efficiency and demand management was lagging targets.


Eskom's building programme is experiencing delays of at least a year.


The regulator said the government should consider formulating a policy that would balance Eskom's commercial decisions and the national security of electricity supply in order to avoid national crises.


Further investigation into the management of primary energy, coal management and the availability, adequacy and optimum utilisation of Eskom's generation plant in emergencies, especially in view of the mid-life of these plants, was also recommended.

 

Add your comment

(No bad language or hate speech, please)

Comments Order    

Stormin
May 19 2008 13:48 Report this comment

I wonder how Jacob Maroga feels about this move. The truth is finally coming out. The whole Eskom crisis was caused by incompetent people who earned huge bonuses for poor performance and who are now a liability on the state. Alec Erwin's departure next year is now also being explained. Independent operators will be a very possitive step to secure our future electricity capacity provided that they do not have to account to the Eskom gravy train passengers.
 
RE
May 19 2008 13:45 Report this comment

Although independent power producers work well in most other countries I fear this will be just another gravy train opportunity for some stinking rich black elitist to get even richer.
 
manicm
May 19 2008 13:21 Report this comment

So a monopoly will become a cartel, hurrah!
 
anton
May 19 2008 13:07 Report this comment

AGREE AGREE AGREE TO THE ABOVE INFORMED
 
QWL
May 19 2008 13:05 Report this comment

Heard this one before.I wonder which board game will be appropriated next.Truth or Dare?
 
MacZero
May 19 2008 12:45 Report this comment

High unplanned maintenance,read as "we did not do any maintenance and eesh we broke it". Centralised high-level government unit, "more jobs for the boys who have already stuffed things up". Low stockpile levels, "eesh we sold it to the local townships and uncle Bob".
 
Juan
May 19 2008 12:37 Report this comment

Wasn't telkom ALSO supposed to get competition? There's just NO WAY our government would EVER allow competition for theire little cash cows!
 
 
Your name  
Email  
Comment
(500 characters remaining)
 

 
Please enter the text below(Case sensitive)
 
 
If you can see the following field, please ignore it, as it is used to verify that you are human.

 
  Disclaimer

Fin24.com encourages freedom of speech and the expression of diverse views. The views of users published on Fin24.com are therefore their own and do not represent the views of Fin24.com. All posts are monitored by Fin24.com's editors and grossly derogatory posts will be deleted. The Fin24.com editorial team will delete your comment should you post abusive comments, use vulgar language or make discriminatory observations.

Company Snapshot

Video

5 questions with John Munro
2010/02/08 05:25:00 PM

Fin24.com spoke to the Rand Uranium CEO at the 2010 Mining Indaba about the company's planned R3.5bn plant. Time: 2:08

Search engine friendly content

Blogs

Podcasts