Share

Cell C slam banner man awaits fate

Johannesburg - Judge Sharise Weiner is set to hand down judgment on Thursday in a case relating to a scathing Cell C billboard erected by a furious customer.

The South Gauteng High Court in Johannesburg heard on Wednesday that the banner calling Cell C the most useless service provider in South Africa is defamatory to the point of unlawfulness.

In an urgent application before Judge Weiner, Christopher Whittcutt, for Cell C, argued the banner was a defamatory statement, and unashamedly so.

The banner was put up by George Prokas at the WorldWear Mall on Beyers Naude Drive on November 6.

Cell C sought interim relief to have the banner taken down.

The banner, which appeared professionally printed and bore the Cell C logo, was prominently displayed at the mall along the road.

"The most useless service provider in SA - Cell C Sandton City," it read.

It gave the name of the franchise manager and his phone number, claiming he had said that his "unnamed executive head refuses to assist the customer".

Unlawfulness

Whittcutt said: "As it stands, it continues to be unlawful and it is that unlawfulness the applicant seeks to interdict."

The dispute arose from a phone Prokas had taken up for his son with Cell C in 2013. The phone's indicated number turned out to belong to and was being used by a different person.

That individual ran up a bill of R5 000, by which time Prokas ended the stop-order for the phone in October last year.

However, when attempting to buy a car earlier in 2014, Prokas discovered he was listed as a bad debtor as a result of the unpaid R5 000.

He sought to have the bill waived by Cell C and removed from the bad debtors list by the end of October this year.

However, by the end of October the situation had not changed.

Prokas exchanged e-mails with Cell C, indicating he would put the banner up unless his complaints were dealt with.

'Pay me money'

Whittcutt said, paraphrasing Prokas's communication with the company, "I will stop defaming you if you waive the bill and pay me money".

It had cost Prokas R61 200 to make and put the banner up, which he sought payment for from Cell C, Whittcutt said.

"This is blackmail, as defined in the Oxford English Dictionary."

After his complaints were allegedly not dealt with, Prokas put the banner up.

"To defame somebody is to be presumed unlawful... the banner must come down," Whittcutt said.

The banner had been changed over this weekend, which Prokas had indicated he was not involved in, and now read "Cell C the most useful cellular provider", with the logo altered.

It was not known who altered the banner.

Whittcutt said that while the banner had changed, it was still there and Prokas remained "defiant and unrepentant" for what he originally said.

Devil in the detail

"He [Prokas] wants to put it back up as it originally was, without [franchise manager] Mr Van Rooyen's details," Whittcutt said.

"Unless he [Prokas] is interdicted from doing so, that is exactly what he is going to do."

He said the fact Prokas would not include the name and number of the franchise manager as originally stated showed he had erred by doing so in the first place.

The court also heard that Cell C's urgent application was about revenge.

"What this is about is revenge and reprisal," Shem Symon, for Prokas, told the court. "We have a 1st respondent [Prokas] here who is a consumer advocate. He insists on his right to be heard."

What's done is done

Symon questioned how the cellphone provider could ask for an interim interdict for something that had already happened.

"I don't really understand, after it has already happened and after it has gone viral," he said.

The reaction to the banner on social media, following the appearance of pictures of the original banner, was consumers showing their dissatisfaction with poor service.

"This is a... reaction in the modern day electronic media environment of consumers saying no," Symon said.

At one point in submissions, Judge Weiner remarked: "I wonder who is wishing they had written off the R5 000."

Symon, when making his submission, also strongly disagreed with Whittcutt's assertion that Prokas had sought to blackmail the company.

Weiner was expected to rule on the matter on Thursday afternoon.

ALSO READ:

Cell C: Expert warns on consumer backlash



We live in a world where facts and fiction get blurred
Who we choose to trust can have a profound impact on our lives. Join thousands of devoted South Africans who look to News24 to bring them news they can trust every day. As we celebrate 25 years, become a News24 subscriber as we strive to keep you informed, inspired and empowered.
Join News24 today
heading
description
username
Show Comments ()
Rand - Dollar
18.99
-0.4%
Rand - Pound
23.99
-0.4%
Rand - Euro
20.52
-0.3%
Rand - Aus dollar
12.37
-0.2%
Rand - Yen
0.13
-0.5%
Platinum
904.37
+0.8%
Palladium
1,014.65
+1.3%
Gold
2,209.01
+0.7%
Silver
24.67
+0.1%
Brent Crude
86.09
-0.2%
Top 40
68,311
+0.9%
All Share
74,499
+0.8%
Resource 10
57,075
+2.5%
Industrial 25
104,076
+0.8%
Financial 15
16,473
-0.3%
All JSE data delayed by at least 15 minutes Iress logo
Company Snapshot
Editorial feedback and complaints

Contact the public editor with feedback for our journalists, complaints, queries or suggestions about articles on News24.

LEARN MORE
Government tenders

Find public sector tender opportunities in South Africa here.

Government tenders
This portal provides access to information on all tenders made by all public sector organisations in all spheres of government.
Browse tenders