Register now for Fin24 Dashboard and get access to portfolios, watchlists, financial comparison tools, and a whole lot more to help you achieve your financial goals.

Data provided by McGregor BFA
All data is delayed
Loading...
 
Prices are delayed by 15min.
Join the Fin24.com conversation about JSE-listed stock by using every time you tweet.

Ebitda a key line

Jun 02 2010 15:17 Marc Hasenfuss

Related Articles

The Ebitda Table

Right manager, right fund

Patience required for PPC rewards

Astrapak earnings shoot up

Slight drop in Reunert earnings

Tongaat sees sweeter earnings

 

Top Stories

Cell C move sparks price war

May 27 2012 11:21

There's a price war raging between South Africa's cellphone networks after Cell C lowered the rates of its prepaid calls by more than 34%.

MyCiti buses running at a loss

May 28 2012 07:53

The City of Cape Town has spent R175m running the Myciti bus service since the Soccer World Cup compared to an income of R35m, a report says.

Another golf estate victim

May 27 2012 13:09

The oversupply of golf estates has claimed another victim.

 
Share Share line Print
Ebitda is arguably still the worst acronym in the ever-morphing lexicon of financial jargon.

As one observer remarked: “It sounds like the sound frogs make at night.”

Ebitda – or earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortisation – has increasingly become the key line in company income statements.

With a host of factors – thanks to new accounting regulations – able to influence what’s stated in the various forms of earnings Ebitda is increasingly being recognised as the “purest” measure of a company’s operational performance.

The distiller

What we mean by “pure” is that Ebitda distils the best of the top line performance, taking into account the fixed and variable costs to running a business but leaving out factors not of an operational nature.

While some may argue interest (earned or paid), tax, depreciation and amortisation are absolutely part and parcel of a company’s operational life, no doubt that’s true.

But tax rates (for various technical reasons) can change, interest rates fluctuate, while amortisation and depreciation are fairly subjective matters.

Those factors can skew – or even obscure - a company’s real operational performance.

While the Ebitda table ranks by size rather than growth, there are some interesting conclusions that can be drawn from the rankings.

For the second year running banks have held on to the top rankings with resource stocks (top of the pile two years ago) hardly getting a look in the top 10.

In fact only Sasol (fourth last year), Anglo Platinum and BHP Billiton held on to positions seven, eight and nine.

The banks did a bit of a shuffle, with Standard Bank usurping Absa as “top dog”, and Nedbank edging ahead of FirstRand, which also slipped behind cellular services giant MTN.

SA’s other cell giant, Vodacom, clinched 10th spot, with Telkom – which unbundled Vodacom – coming 11th.

The rankings


The big mover was industrial giant Remgro, which moved from 17th place to sixth place.

Remgro, now sans its sizeable tobacco interests (BAT), will probably not hold such a high position in next year’s rankings. Interestingly, BAT (British American Tobacco), the second largest company on the JSE by market cap, only ranked 28th in the Ebitda rankings.

Some surprises in the rankings would be the ranking’s suggestion that private hospitals group Netcare, plus industrial conglomerates Bidvest and Steinhoff, made more profits in 2009 than SABMiller, Old Mutual and Sanlam.

That certainly raises the odd eyebrow.

The more intriguing observations on the Ebitda rankings can be made in reference to the growth rankings – especially those over five years.

Top growth ranking over five years was lending specialist African Dawn (Afdawn), with a rate of 184%.

However, Afdawn has fallen from grace, with its recent financial results having to be radically restated.

With hindsight, Afdawn’s flattering ranking might perhaps serve as a warning there are risks in quickly growing a company’s earnings base.
 
Other companies that stood out with astounding growth rates in Ebitda over five years included gold miner Simmers (175%) and building supplies firm Buildmax (173%).

Without taking anything away from their respective performances, both companies have built Ebitda off a low base.

The same might be said for junior miners Petmin (109%) and Merafe (88%)  – and again we aren’t being disparaging about their five-year achievements, because shareholders must be delighted.

The winners

Indeed, it’s the wider building sector and mining industry that seems to have come out tops in the five-year rankings for Ebitda.

Construction giants Murray & Roberts and Aveng achieved growth in Ebitda of 49% and 48% respectively over five years.

However, they were outdone by Wilson Bayly Holmes - Ovcon, which managed 56%.

Group Five (33%) and Basil Read (35%) were not too far behind.

Among the big commodity groups were some mixed performances over five years, ranging from Anglo American’s 6.7% to BHP Billiton’s 22.5%. Anglo Platinum fared well at 38% and Sasol notched up a solid 20%.

Most impressive among the larger mining groups was gold miner Harmony (64%), base metal miner Assore (69%) and copper miner Palabora Mining (91%).


Notable performances

Other standout performances over five years include media giant Naspers (33%), cell services group MTN (53%), shipping group Grindrod (63%), industrial conglomerate Steinhoff (40%), Richemont (30%) and private hospitals groups Netcare (34%) and Medi-Clinic (33%).

Banks, the biggest generators of Ebitda, fared satisfactorily over five years. Absa led the pack with 23%, followed by Standard (21%), Nedbank (17%) and FirstRand (16%).

Banking sector upstart Capitec Bank (53%) and, to a lesser extent, Abil (25%) looked far slicker.

Part of the fun of scouring the five-year table is to pick out companies that have been performing below their potential.

In that regard, check the five-year growth rankings for Barloworld, Imperial, Nampak, AECI, Afrox, Metair, AVI, Sun International and PPC.

Perhaps not a bad little “recovery portfolio”?

 - Finweek

To view the Ebitda Table, click here

 
 
Comment on this story
0 comments
Add your comment
Comment 0 characters remaining
It pays to know the cost and what you’re getting in return
May 28 2012 09:33

Investors may not have a clue what they’re paying their money managers or they type of service they’re getting, or, whether they can actually negotiate lower fees. (Reuters)

Sasha

"In the short term this is true, Greece will dominate the headlines on a day to day basis, until their next elections when there would be some clarity to answer the question, "What next for Greece?" Amazingly everyone except the politicians seem to be lining themselves up for worst case scenario, b... Read their blog...

Recently updated
Podcasts
The Sishen saga

Legal expert Peter Leon on the increasingly complex legal wrangle over the Sishen Iron Ore mine. Time: 8:17 Listen Here...

Before you list

Is the clarion call of the JSE calling? Listen to Fin24’s expert panel discussion before you list your small business. Time: 17:29

Compare and Buy

Compare and apply for hundreds of financial products from many suppliers.

Credit cards Medical aid Current accounts Think Money

Money Clinic

Money Clinic Do you have a question about your finances? We'll get an expert opinion.
Click here...

Loading...