Related Articles
Top Stories
Feb 13 2012 12:15
Miner Xstrata says it has brought forward maintenance on two furnaces to assist Eskom to save power.
Feb 13 2012 10:43
Although jobs were created, the economy is still 420 000 jobs short of the peak employment level before the 2009 global financial crisis, says Adcorp.
Feb 13 2012 07:58
Greek lawmakers have approved a new round of drastic austerity measures after a long day of street battles between police and protesters left dozens injured.
Johannesburg - A new tax amendment tabled in parliament, which applies to people who hold their primary residences in companies and trusts, will probably only be passed into law in early 2010.
Originally the amendment was supposed to affect only residences owned by companies, but it is has been confirmed to include trusts as well.
The amendment will allow taxpayers to transfer primary residences held in a trust or company into their own name, with no tax penalty payable.
However, this applies only to those who have lived in their primary residences since February 11 2009, who need to take advantage of the tax relief before December 31 2011.
Robert Gad, a director in the tax department of Edward Nathan Sonnenberg (ENS), said this is an opportunity to weigh up the advantages and disadvantages of moving property out of a trust or company.
"In the current environment affecting financial institutions, not all interest rates and bonds are as favourable or as easily obtainable as they have been," he said. He added that moving property could have a negative financial impact.
Head director of ENS property department Allison Alexander said: "It is recommended that in instances where the trust or company has registered a bond over the property, a discussion takes place with the financial institution as to whether the proposed new owner could be substituted as debtor under the existing bond.
"This would reduce the bond costs by half as well as other costs imposed, such as the deeds office levy, which is less for individuals."
- Fin24.com