Share

Eskom wants new nuclear station by 2026

Eskom will apply lessons learnt from its current new build programme to reduce the risks of delays and cost overruns in the proposed nuclear programme, says Matshela Koko, the power utility's group executive for generation. He writes:

The Department of Energy will recommend to Cabinet that Eskom is to be appointed as the procurer, owner and operator of the new nuclear energy build programme as per the Nuclear Energy Policy of 2008.

It will further propose that the South African Nuclear Energy Corporation (Necsa) be designated as the owner operator of the front-end side of the fuel cycle, including the multi-purpose reactor. The Department of Energy will remain the nuclear policy co-ordinator for the nuclear build programme.

READ: Is SA playing Russian roulette with nuclear energy?

Eskom, National Treasury, Department of Public Enterprises and the Department of Energy have been directed to collaborate and to present a funding plan for the nuclear build programme. This funding plan will be finalised after the final proposals from the vendors have been received.

It is common practice for bids of this nature to include a funding option. The entities will also focus on developing a collaboration framework for the implementation of the nuclear programme.

READ: Eskom may have R150bn war chest to spend on nuclear

The approved Integrated Resource Plan makes provision for an additional 9 600 MW of nuclear energy by 2030. Government has always indicated that the nuclear build programme will be rolled out at a scale and pace that the country can afford. This means that more phased approach to the nuclear build programme will be adopted compared to an upfront commitment of the full costs of the programme.

The phased approach aligns to the improving financial and operating position of Eskom.

Consistent with the phased approach, it is envisaged that the first two reactors will be built and commissioned by 2026, in order to mitigate against the projection of base load capacity running out between 2026 and 2028. The size of the first two reactors will be between 2 400 MW and 3 200 MW, depending on the vendor selected. The two reactors will be designed for 80 years operating life, with a targeted payback period of between 20 and 25 years.

READ: SA suffers as the greedy few pursue wealth and power

To achieve the technology transfer and other long-term objectives, there will be a series of long-term agreements specifying at what stage and under what conditions the relevant technology transfers will occur. To encourage localisation, it will be important that for certain key components, long-term supply contracts are put in place beyond the first two reactors to justify manufacturing locally.

This will enable sustainable job creation and ensure that socio- economic factors are suitably addressed.

Another key item to be agreed with the initial contracts will be the basis on which Eskom will buy fuel from Necsa, thereby allowing Necsa to create a business case for the establishment of the full scope of the local fuel facilities.

READ: How nuclear and state capture theories collide

In the past few years the Renewable Energy Independent Power Producer (REIPP) programme, which outlines the collaboration between government, the private sector and the regulator has given Eskom additional confidence in the available spectrum of funding options for the nuclear build programme.

Under the REIPP programme the private sector has contributed approximately R200bn to infrastructure development.

Government therefore has a contingent liability of between R200bn and approximately R900bn over a 20-year period. This is secured via power purchase agreements with Eskom and a very robust and rigid regulatory framework that enables a full pass-through of independent power producer (IPP) related costs to the consumer.

READ: Eskom abusing its power, says wind industry

A significant amount of funding raised by the IPPs, has been provided with appropriate security in an efficient manner. It is our contention that these formulae could be replicated for the nuclear build programme.

Eskom has also been able to assess possible funding models that support government’s mandate to own and operate the new nuclear plant. These include project financing options, export credit agency (ECA) financing, and part equity from original equipment manufacturers.

To ensure the viability of the project financing option and to manage the risk in this option Eskom has to be the operator of the plant as it is the only entity in the country that has experience in running a nuclear power facility.

It has owned and operated Koeberg power station successfully. Furthermore, Eskom has the ability to leverage its existing stream of
cashflow and equity. This could be used as Eskom’s equity contribution in a potential project financing structure.

A large portion of build programmes utilise ECA agreements. Countries will export goods to South Africa as part of the build programme and will thus be willing to provide guarantees.

The procurement of the nuclear programme will therefore rely less on sovereign guarantees. Eskom has had a great deal of exposure to ECA options during the last two years in funding its current build programme.

It is also common practice for the original equipment manufacturers to have an equity stake in a build programme of this nature to provide an alternative source of funding for the project.

The equity stake by original equipment manufacturers if adopted, may ensure that cost overruns are tightly managed, schedule delays minimised and quality enhanced. These are key considerations in any build programme.

READ: Eskom gets lead role in state's new nuclear masterplan

Eskom has learnt significant lessons from its current new build programme that it can put to good use in the nuclear programme and to reduce the risk of schedule delays and cost overruns. It will also leverage its current relationships to ensure maximum delivery of socioeconomic impacts of the nuclear build programme.

Eskom has successfully executed its turnaround strategy, which includes the operational turnaround of the generation fleet; new build delivery of projects and financial stability, in particular the revised funding programme.

The suggestion by some political parties that the Department of Energy is recommending Eskom as the procurer, owner and operator to allow it free reign and to prevent proper parliamentary oversight is ridiculous.

Eskom, through the Department of Public Enterprise, is accountable to Parliament and is expected to adhere to section 217 of the Constitution and the Public Finance Management Act.

Read Fin24's top stories trending on Twitter:

We live in a world where facts and fiction get blurred
Who we choose to trust can have a profound impact on our lives. Join thousands of devoted South Africans who look to News24 to bring them news they can trust every day. As we celebrate 25 years, become a News24 subscriber as we strive to keep you informed, inspired and empowered.
Join News24 today
heading
description
username
Show Comments ()
Rand - Dollar
18.94
-0.9%
Rand - Pound
24.10
-0.9%
Rand - Euro
20.59
-0.7%
Rand - Aus dollar
12.42
-0.9%
Rand - Yen
0.13
-0.8%
Platinum
915.75
-0.8%
Palladium
1,028.36
-3.5%
Gold
2,159.96
+0.2%
Silver
25.03
-0.6%
Brent Crude
85.34
-0.1%
Top 40
66,252
0.0%
All Share
72,431
0.0%
Resource 10
53,317
0.0%
Industrial 25
100,473
0.0%
Financial 15
16,622
0.0%
All JSE data delayed by at least 15 minutes Iress logo
Company Snapshot
Editorial feedback and complaints

Contact the public editor with feedback for our journalists, complaints, queries or suggestions about articles on News24.

LEARN MORE
Government tenders

Find public sector tender opportunities in South Africa here.

Government tenders
This portal provides access to information on all tenders made by all public sector organisations in all spheres of government.
Browse tenders