Gordhan's juggling act
FINANCE Minister Pravin Gordhan has to juggle the need to stimulate
economic growth with the need for fiscal prudence in his budget on
The chances are good that he won’t drop one of the balls.
need to stimulate economic growth and create jobs isn’t only
politically important in a year which sees municipal elections, but also
significant for an economy that’s just sputtering along.
the most important driver of economic growth and jobs is the private
sector, but companies have been cautious about hiring and investing.
In such a scenario, it’s up to the government to take up some of the slack.
there are limits to what it can and should do. If it tries to do too
much, it risks ending up in a debt trap, where it just borrows money to
pay interest with little else left to spend on the necessities.
If it tries to ignore the debt trap, the Zimbabwe crisis option awaits.
was the need for prudence in government’s fiscal policies illustrated
more aptly than during the European sovereign debt crisis.
over the world, there are concerns about fiscal deficits and government
debt. Wednesday’s budget is delivered against a backdrop of strong
global focus on these issues.
That’s why, unsexy as it may be,
the most important story on budget day is what is happening to the
deficit and to government debt.
Yes, you may be more interested in personal income tax changes or
sin taxes, but ultimately the deficit will show whether the country’s
future is being mortgaged, and for this reason it’s very important.
fiscal deficits rose during the recession as governments announced
bailout packages, tax revenue dried up and banks failed.
have the bank failures, but it did have the bailout and the vicious fall
in tax revenue, resulting in a deficit of 6,7% of gross domestic
product (GDP) in the 2009/10 fiscal year.
This was budgeted to
fall to 6,3% of GDP in the following fiscal year, but latest estimates
put the deficit at 5,3%, or R143,1bn in the current fiscal year.
there seems to be two extremes in the way deficits are being managed.
There are the loose policies of the US, where additional fiscal stimulus
was announced at the end of last year.
Not much room to manoeuvre
Japan also has a
notoriously high government debt-to-gross domestic product (GDP) ratio,
but this is funded largely by Japanese money with little dependence on
the outside world.
On the other hand are the extreme policies
of Britain and Germany, neither of which was forced into the kind of
masochistic government austerity they are both implementing.
Britain, the VAT rate was raised and benefits cut, with spending slashed
across the board. In Germany, too, spending cuts are vicious.
countries want to stand out from those in Europe that have been forced
into accepting bailouts from the European Union and the International
Greece with a bailout of €100bn and Ireland with a bailout of €85bn stand out.
Italy, Portugal, Spain and Belgium have also been in the spotlight.
Some commentators believe the crisis isn’t over yet, and that Greece and
Ireland will both ultimately default on their debt, leading to a
restructuring and losses for bond holders.
In that situation, the cost of their debt will rise significantly, as bond holders price in the possibility of future defaults.
SA doesn’t have the same problems as Ireland and Greece. Unlike Ireland, its banking system is in good shape.
unlike Greece, it started off the recession with debt at low levels.
The country also has a tax base that is in much better shape than
Still, this doesn’t mean that warning lights shouldn’t
be flashing for SA. Where the focus should lie is on interest
expenditure, which is set to rise by an average annual rate of 16.7%
between 2010/11 to 2013/14.
This means that average real growth
in government non-interest spending over the next three years has to be
contained to 2.7%. This is a far cry from the levels of around 8% seen
in the boom years.
It’s clear that government has very little
room to maneouvre because of the high cost of servicing state debt built
up during the recession.
From that it’s obvious that there’s
very little scope for meaningful reductions in personal income taxes. In
fact, when the National Health Insurance (NHI) is factored in, personal
income taxes will rise.
The NHI hasn’t yet been budgeted for,
so the picture painted in the budget will change drastically from 2012,
when the NHI is supposed to start.
In the short term, don’t
expect personal income tax to do more than compensate for fiscal drag,
if that. SA has a deficit to cut, and if Gordhan is going to stick to
the targets he set in his mini-budget, as expected, he has little room
The people are hungry:it is because those in authority eat up too much in taxes. Lao Tzu
So it is hopeless?
It is ridiculous to implement NHI if 32% of the people are out of work. Essentially the taxpayer will give free health care to 32% of the people. That is an extra tax burden on the economy, not to mention the Gauteng toll gates which will just increase the cost of doing business in Gauteng. All this is money that should have been spent to create jobs - it will now take away money and jobs from the private sector and increase taxes. The more you tax the people, the less money there is to start up businesses and the less money there is to spend at businesses. Less jobs each year means more tax is needed. And the cycle continues. A short-fall in taxes leading to more tax increases. The key is to use tax money efficiently. To produce something. Now we will give away free health care to unemployed people. They will be healthy and still unemployed. Cut business taxes to spur growth. Stimulate businesses and production, not expensive consumption. And medical aid is about as expensive as consumption as you can stimulate. Stimulate jobs not taxes.
Greta, how about informing everyone that the central bank is a privately owned corporation with a monopoly on the issuing of money not the government. That SARS is also the privately owned debt collection agency. Maybe you could also inform them of how all "money" comes into existence from loans. Loans with collateral and interest. You could inform then their income tax goes to paying the interest on these loans. Something that wouldn't exist if government issued the money.
Greta, If money is issued by private banks not the SA government and Government bonds are backed by the labour of the South Africa people, then isn't the bond market nothing but the buying and selling of people? A modern day slave labour market.