• SA cities need foreigners

    We need to protect our cities' cosmopolitan nature, says Mzwandile Jacks.

  • Am I a racist?

    Does hating government's arrogance, nepotism and greed make me a bigot, asks Anton Ressel.

  • Recipe for disaster

    Malema's flames of frustration are fuelling white extremism, says Leopold Scholtz.

See More

A smart move

Oct 19 2012 07:15 Mzwandile Jacks

President Jacob Zuma. Photo: Franco Megannon

Company Data

Anglo American Plat Ltd [JSE:AMS]

Last traded 302
Change 6
% Change 2
Cumulative volume 351509
Market cap 0

Last Updated: 17-04-2015 at 05:00. Prices are delayed by 15 minutes. Source: McGregor BFA

Related Articles

SA in for R5bn tax knock on pay freeze

Freeze top earners' salaries - Zuma

Strikes: Zuma reveals ‘action package’

Return to work now, Zuma tells strikers

Zuma meets business, labour

SA in for R5bn tax knock on pay freeze


PRESIDENT Jacob Zuma’s call this week for South Africa’s mining company executives to freeze their salaries and bonuses for the next 12 months is not only a case of attempted social justice, but clever business advice.

Freezing salaries should go a long way towards stabilising the country, which is currently beset by wildcat strikes in the mining and other sectors.

You see, if workers' wages stay low and those of executives and directors continue to shoot through the roof each year, uncertainty will haunt the market place and the country as a whole as workers will continue to embark on strikes.

But if executives do not increase their wages, businesses will be more stable and secure and workers will not go on strike as frequently as they do now.

This logic could have informed Zuma’s clarion call this week, when he asked executives at mining firms to take a year-long salary freeze and called on workers to return to their jobs after a series of violent strikes.

In the wave of wildcat strikes which has hit the country's mining companies, miners and officials have been killed. The world's biggest platinum producer, Anglo Platinum [JSE:AMS], last week fired 12 000 striking workers.

As is the trend in South Africa’s private and public sector, Zuma’s call may go unheeded. As someone who has been a financial journalist all my career, I have seen some company executives pay themselves huge salaries and bonuses even when their company’s share price and earnings were depressed.

This has been questioned by many people but nothing has been done to stop it. South African companies are used to being threatened by all sorts of legislation, but not much happens to them when they transgress the law.

A good example is the employment equity laws which have been ignored by most companies. There are still companies in South Africa which spurn EE legislation, with staff complements that do not reflect the demographics of the country.

But all the instruments that are supposed to deal with these companies have not been used by the department of labour.

Additionally, the issue of pay cuts is not even legislated, making it easier for these companies to ignore the call by Zuma. We can then say that Zuma made a good call, but will it change attitudes of company executives towards pay? I doubt it.

Corporates are going to defend their big executive paydays. Their argument is always: “If we don’t pay up, our greatest minds will jump ship.”

Now, there are decent motives for compensating high-profile executives because they make decisions that are very important to their companies. This makes it a priority to appoint skilled people rather than pull in their horns on pay.

But studies have dismissed the brain drain defence for high executive salaries. They have discredited the idea that companies must keep up with their peers by compensating their executives continuously.

This peer group logic is a huge motivator for ever-rising compensation. Boards say this helps them set pay based on what the market will stomach.

Well, perhaps not.

Contrary to the prevailing line, it is understood that CEOs cannot readily transfer their skills from one company to another. In other words, the argument that they will leave if they aren’t compensated well does not hold water.

Using the peer group salary mark only pushes pay upwards.

If companies continue to buy into the logic of peer group standards, they must know that they will destabilise the economy which is currently struggling.

 - Fin24

jacob zuma  |  pay hikes  |  executive pay  |  strikes


Am I a racist?

2015-04-17 09:53


Read Fin24’s Comments Policy

24.com publishes all comments posted on articles provided that they adhere to our Comments Policy. Should you wish to report a comment for editorial review, please do so by clicking the 'Report Comment' button to the right of each comment.

Comment on this story
Add your comment
Comment 0 characters remaining

Company Snapshot

Brought to you by BizNews

More from BizNews

We're talking about:


Johannesburg has been selected to host the Global Entrepreneurship Congress in 2017. "[The congress] will ensure that small business development remains firmly on the national agenda and the radar screen of all stakeholders, the Small Business Development minister said.

Must see! The most luxurious dog house!

This dog house comes with a treadmill and hot tub, you have to see it!


Luxury living

Ridiculous demands people with too much money make
8 of the priciest places to dock your yacht
Habits of the world’s richest people

Money Clinic

Money Clinic
Do you have a question about your finances? We'll get an expert opinion.
Click here...

Voting Booth

Government’s call for the private sector to add power to the grid is:

Previous results · Suggest a vote