Publications
Partners
A Fin24 user asks:
I was an employee as well as a member of the Unitrans
Retirement Fund. I was retrenched in 2007, and that fund was converted to early
retirement. This was after 37 years of service.
In February this year, I was advised that the board of the
fund had proposed an apportionment of the surplus fund, and that I will be due
for a portion of this surplus.
In March this year, I received correspondence from Simeka
Consultants & Actuaries advising me of the amount that will be due to me.
As this is substantial, I will be liable for tax.
My concern is that at the time of leaving the company, I was
advised that there was no surplus and I had my funds transferred to a living
annuity, which of course is not taxed.
Surely if this amount was allocated to my fund at the time
of my leaving the company, then I would not be liable for the tax that I will
be subject to now, when I receive the surplus?
Don Richter, a financial planner at PSG Konsult,
responds:
The simple answer is that the reader's apportionment surplus
should be exempt from income tax. This is according to a directive made public
by the South African Revenue Service in 2009.
If the reader had been an active member of the fund, the
situation would have been different.
Any lump sum benefit received by or accrued to a person
after his or her retirement or death, withdrawal or resignation from any
pension fund, pension or preservation fund will not constitute gross income of
that person.
This also includes resignation from a provident fund,
provident preservation fund or retirement annuity fund and the winding up of
any such fund.
- Fin24
*Do you have a pressing financial question? Post it on our Money Clinic section and we will get an expert to answer your query.
*For more on this and other Fin24 stories, visit our Facebook, Twitter and Google+.
