Share

Not winning the debt battle

A Fin24 user has been paying off her debts since 2009, but feels she is not making any progress. She writes:

I have a question regarding the idea that paying off one's debt depends on how much you make available to pay.

It has been suggested that one should be able to pay off your debt between five to seven years if you don’t have a house or car, and within 10 to 30 years if you do.

I do not have a house nor a car and am under debt review. I have been paying since 2009.

It feels like I am never going to pay these accounts off as the interest and charges on these accounts get added.

It looks like I am not winning. I am with a debt councellor, but just feels like nothing is happening. Please can you advise?

Deborah Solomon of The Debt Counselling Industry (DCI) responds:

There are a few issues that you want addressed and statements that you have made that need to be corrected.

You are correct when stating that paying off one’s debt, would depend on the amount one makes available to creditors monthly.
 
The assumption on the next statement, namely that one should pay off the debt between five to seven years with no bond or car, is incorrect.

This is because this factor would be determined by the amount of debt, the interest rates, the monthly repayment amount, whether your debt counsellor has taken the in duplum rule into account or whether there is there an annual escalation.

Depending on any of these above factors, the outcome would vary by years.

An example of the above could be the following:

Client A

A client can only afford R1 000 per month as repayment towards his creditors.

The debt counsellor does a restructure without trying to lower the interest rates and without adding in an annual escalation of 5%.

The restructure works out that client A would become debt free in a seven year period.

Client B

The client can only afford the R1 000 per month as repayment towards his creditors.

The debt counsellor does a restructure with lowering of interest rates and adds in a 5% annual escalation.
 
The restructure works out that client B would become debt free in a three year period.

Consumers need to realise that the more they can pay off while under debt review, the sooner they will become debt free.

Small amounts make large dents in the debt, especially if a court order has been granted and there is a fixed calculation that must be adhered too.

I would suggest the following in your case:

Get a copy of the court order as well as the repayment plan.

Make sure that the repayments are being adhered to by getting monthly payment reports from the debt counsellor.

Get detailed statements from all credit providers from the inception of each account to date.

Check to see if there are any other charges other than the capital amount and interest being charged.
 
Anything other than interest and capital would not be in line with the court order and your creditors would need to adjust their systems accordingly.

Don’t allow the creditors to intimidate you. You have a court order, which everyone must adhere to, even the banks. There are no exceptions.

In duplum rule

From the statement of a creditor, determine what date default occurred and then double that debt.

From the date of default, the debt, which includes all service charges, interest rates, credit life insurance, collections and legal fees, may never become more than double.

This is in terms of Section 103(5) of the National Credit Act. It is called the in duplum rule and is one rule every credit provider tries to hide from every consumer.

Consumers must become more aware of their rights, especially in this regard and start challenging their creditors.

The debt under debt review can only go up to a certain point and then must come down.

I suggest you speak to your debt counsellor and follow the above suggestions and I am sure you would be pleasantly surprised.

It does take many hours and this is why many debt counsellors don’t enforce this rule.

But every consumer under debt review needs to work together with his or her debt counsellor, especially when brining to light issues such as the in duplum rule.

- Fin24

Do you have a pressing financial question? Post it on our Money Clinic section and we will get an expert to answer your query.

Disclaimer

Fin24 cannot be held liable for any investment decisions made based on the advice given by independent financial service providers.

Under the ECT Act and to the fullest extent possible under the applicable law, Fin24 disclaims all responsibility or liability for any damages whatsoever resulting from the use of this site in any manner.


We live in a world where facts and fiction get blurred
Who we choose to trust can have a profound impact on our lives. Join thousands of devoted South Africans who look to News24 to bring them news they can trust every day. As we celebrate 25 years, become a News24 subscriber as we strive to keep you informed, inspired and empowered.
Join News24 today
heading
description
username
Show Comments ()
Rand - Dollar
18.94
-0.9%
Rand - Pound
24.10
-0.9%
Rand - Euro
20.59
-0.7%
Rand - Aus dollar
12.42
-0.9%
Rand - Yen
0.13
-0.8%
Platinum
915.75
-0.8%
Palladium
1,028.36
-3.5%
Gold
2,159.96
+0.2%
Silver
25.03
-0.6%
Brent Crude
85.34
-0.1%
Top 40
66,252
0.0%
All Share
72,431
0.0%
Resource 10
53,317
0.0%
Industrial 25
100,473
0.0%
Financial 15
16,622
0.0%
All JSE data delayed by at least 15 minutes Iress logo
Company Snapshot
Editorial feedback and complaints

Contact the public editor with feedback for our journalists, complaints, queries or suggestions about articles on News24.

LEARN MORE
Government tenders

Find public sector tender opportunities in South Africa here.

Government tenders
This portal provides access to information on all tenders made by all public sector organisations in all spheres of government.
Browse tenders