• Road to riches

    Taxpayers keep funding structures with big plans but who knows what efficacy, says Mandi Smallhorne.

  • Don't fall for Ponzi scams

    An expert unpacks the tell-tale signs to watch out for.

  • Inside Labour

    A smokescreen of misleading rhetoric won't make SA's problems go away, says Terry Bell.

See More

Banks face legal battles to sell houses

Apr 25 2011 12:32 Andile Ntingi and Nhlanhla Ncaca

Related Articles

Home owner 'wins' in top court ruling

New rules to rein in SA insurers

Absa, Barclays join forces in Africa

Banks may face claims from indebted clients

Johannesburg - South African banks could find themselves engaged in drawn-out legal battles with cash-strapped home owners following a landmark Constitutional Court judgment that may saddle lenders with more administrative red tape before they can sell the homes of defaulters.

Following the judgment, delivered last week, banks are no longer permitted to sell the homes of defaulting borrowers without the matter being heard by a judge or a magistrate.

In the past banks obtained execution orders from High Court registrars before they could sell the properties, mainly through auctions.

The ruling was made after a Western Cape woman, Elsie Gundwana, won a long court struggle with banking giant Nedbank, which had sold her house to collect less than R5 300 in arrears.

The house was sold by the lender in 2007, but Gundwana had been resisting an eviction order from the new owner.

Consumer rights watchdog the National Consumer Forum (NCF) has hailed the judgment as a victory for consumers, who will now enjoy greater protection as banks will no longer be able to repossess houses as easily as before.

“The ruling will protect the rights of low-income earners and it will now be difficult for anyone to take away their property. For a long time the system exploited consumers because they did not receive fair and proper justice. This is justice for them,” said Thami Bolani, the chairperson of the NCF.

The ruling may cause an administrative headache for the banks, which are still recovering from a high rate of bad debts in their home-loan units because of the recession, which triggered a demand slump and destroyed more than one million jobs.

According to the National Credit Regulator’s 2010 fourth-quarter credit market report, nearly 198 000 accounts were 30 days or more in arrears, owing banks roughly R107 billion. South African consumers are indebted to the banks to the tune of R1.2 trillion, of which home loans account for 64 % (R760 billion) of the figure. Home loans that are in arrears ­account for roughly 14.4% of combined home loan books of banks.

A banking analyst who declined to be named warned that banks could incur more expenses when conducting their business in future due to the judgment.

However, he could not quantify how big the impact on the operating costs of banks would be.

“The ruling will increase expenses ­associated with realising their security on a defaulted home loan. It will also make it burdensome for the banks to realise their security because they will be forced to go through a lengthy court process before realising their security,” the analyst said.

Another analyst, who also did not want to be named, said banks could respond by tightening their lending requirements if the judgment made it more expensive to recover loans from defaulters through attaching and auctioning their homes.

“The banks will be extremely careful to grant loans going forward and they may even increase prices of loans if it became administratively expensive to comply with the judgment,” the analyst warned.

No winners or losers

But banks, which are still studying the judgment, do not foresee the ruling ­having any material effect on them.

Marthinus van Rensburg, head of Absa Bank’s legal department, warned that the ruling may clog up South African courts with cases of unresolved execution of ­immovable property.

“The judgment may have a procedural impact in that all these cases will now require direct oversight by a judge, thereby adding to their case load. This, in turn, may result in a delay in these and other cases being heard,” he said.
Funeka Ntombela, director of home loans at Standard Bank, echoed Van Rensburg’s sentiments.

“The bank anticipates that the judicial process will now take longer. It is better to avoid the judicial process because in court there are no winners or losers.

“Consumers need to approach the banks as soon as they struggle with bond repayments. Standard bank, like other banks, offers a distress sales programme (Easy Sell), where we help sell properties on behalf of indebted consumers,” she said.

- City Press

For more business news, go to www.citypress.co.za/Business.
property  |  debt



Read Fin24’s Comments Policy

24.com publishes all comments posted on articles provided that they adhere to our Comments Policy. Should you wish to report a comment for editorial review, please do so by clicking the 'Report Comment' button to the right of each comment.

Comment on this story
1 comment
Add your comment
Comment 0 characters remaining

Company Snapshot

We're talking about:


Johannesburg has been selected to host the Global Entrepreneurship Congress in 2017. "[The congress] will ensure that small business development remains firmly on the national agenda and the radar screen of all stakeholders, the Small Business Development minister said.

Money Clinic

Money Clinic
Do you have a question about your finances? We'll get an expert opinion.
Click here...

Voting Booth

People who fall victim to Ponzi scams are:

Previous results · Suggest a vote