Related Articles
Top Stories
May 27 2012 11:21
There's a price war raging between South Africa's cellphone networks after Cell C lowered the rates of its prepaid calls by more than 34%.
May 28 2012 07:53
The City of Cape Town has spent R175m running the Myciti bus service since the Soccer World Cup compared to an income of R35m, a report says.
May 27 2012 13:09
The oversupply of golf estates has claimed another victim.
Johannesburg - The SA Revenue Service (Sars) needs to set out clear
guidelines on how it will take money it is owed out of people's bank
accounts, a tax specialist said on Tuesday.
"Unfortunately,
there is nothing in the Income Tax Act which regulates when Sars can do
this: whether it is after the first, second, or third notification that
you owe tax." This is where the concern lies, said Ernst & Young
tax director Vedika Andhee.
Although the Income Tax Act
allowed Sars to recoup money owed in this way, Andhee said there were
no regulations on how many notices had to be issued first, whether the
client first had to be e-mailed or telephoned, or even whether it had
been confirmed that the e-mail and telephone numbers used were up to
date.
Without being forewarned, clients could find money had
been taken by Sars only when they next attempted to withdraw money from
their bank account, she said.
This meant that debit orders
and other financial commitments would bounce if there was not enough
money in the account to cover the tax liability.
The person would also not have the opportunity to contest the payment demanded.
Currently,
if a payment is contested, taxpayers are obliged to hand the money over
until the matter has been resolved. It is refunded if the finding is in
their favour.
The taxman already had an agreement with
employers, whereby a portion of a person's salary was withheld and paid
over every month.
However, to recoup money it felt it was
owed, Sars could appoint an agent such as the client's bank, which was
obliged to transfer the required amount over.
This effectively gave banks the task of becoming tax collectors.
It
also seemed that banks were not obliged to contact clients to inform
them of the instruction that they would do this, said Andhee.
She
believed taxpayers needed to receive proof from Sars that the money was
owed to avoid falling prey to scamsters, and that taking money out of a
bank account should be a "last resort" action.
"There should be some sort of procedure which should be available to the public."
Sars
spokespersons said they would consult Sars' legal adviser, and would
provide details on how the money would be recovered later.
- Sapa