Register now for Fin24 Dashboard and get access to portfolios, watchlists, financial comparison tools, and a whole lot more to help you achieve your financial goals.

Data provided by McGregor BFA
All data is delayed
Loading...
Where am I? Home
 
Prices are delayed by 15min.
Join the Fin24.com conversation about JSE-listed stock by using every time you tweet.

Actress beats taxman

Oct 30 2009 11:38 Amanda Visser

Related Articles

Sars busts VAT fraud syndicate

Sars loses trade mark tax case

Businessman in R20m fraud case

 

Top Stories

Cell C move sparks price war

May 27 2012 11:21

There's a price war raging between South Africa's cellphone networks after Cell C lowered the rates of its prepaid calls by more than 34%.

MyCiti buses running at a loss

May 28 2012 07:53

The City of Cape Town has spent R175m running the Myciti bus service since the Soccer World Cup compared to an income of R35m, a report says.

Another golf estate victim

May 27 2012 13:09

The oversupply of golf estates has claimed another victim.

 
Share Share line Print

Pretoria - The production house owned by Saira Essa, actress, television presenter and programme producer, has won its case against the South African Revenue Service (Sars).

It appears that Sars wanted to register an appeal, but was caught napping and now needs the court's approval to proceed. The case in fact dealt with the scope of the granting of a tax amnesty for small businesses.

The production house approached the High Court in Pretoria to get a declaratory order regarding further criminal prosecution by Sars after it had been granted amnesty.

In 2003 Sars had audited the close corporation's financial affairs and highlighted a VAT underpayment.

The company paid the outstanding VAT, interest on it and a fine. The production house subsequently applied for amnesty when smaller businesses were given an opportunity to get their tax affairs in order.

By this time the company had already appeared in court seven times because of the alleged text transgressions in the criminal case. In her judgment Judge Sulette Potterill declared that in terms of the Tax Amnesty Act the production house should not have received amnesty.

Sars' inability to explain to the court which periods had not come into consideration for the amnesty meant that the VAT included in the charge sheet in the criminal matter was covered by the amnesty.

- Sake24.com

For more business news in Afrikaans, go to Sake24.com.

 
 
Comment on this story
0 comments
Comments have been closed for this article.
It pays to know the cost and what you’re getting in return
May 28 2012 09:33

Investors may not have a clue what they’re paying their money managers or they type of service they’re getting, or, whether they can actually negotiate lower fees. (Reuters)

Sasha

"In the short term this is true, Greece will dominate the headlines on a day to day basis, until their next elections when there would be some clarity to answer the question, "What next for Greece?" Amazingly everyone except the politicians seem to be lining themselves up for worst case scenario, b... Read their blog...

Recently updated
Podcasts
The Sishen saga

Legal expert Peter Leon on the increasingly complex legal wrangle over the Sishen Iron Ore mine. Time: 8:17 Listen Here...

Before you list

Is the clarion call of the JSE calling? Listen to Fin24’s expert panel discussion before you list your small business. Time: 17:29

Compare and Buy

Compare and apply for hundreds of financial products from many suppliers.

Credit cards Medical aid Current accounts Think Money

Money Clinic

Money Clinic Do you have a question about your finances? We'll get an expert opinion.
Click here...

Loading...