Register now for Fin24 Dashboard and get access to portfolios, watchlists, financial comparison tools, and a whole lot more to help you achieve your financial goals.

Data provided by McGregor BFA
All data is delayed
Loading...
Where am I? Home
 
Prices are delayed by 15min.
Join the Fin24.com conversation about JSE-listed stock by using every time you tweet.

NZealand lowers carbon footprint

Sep 10 2008 12:58

Related Articles

NZ financial giant in trouble

NZ watchdog charges 3 airlines

NZealand holds rate steady

NZ dairy farmers boom

NZ, China trade pact a first

Free trade for China and NZ

 

Top Stories

Cell C move sparks price war

May 27 2012 11:21

There's a price war raging between South Africa's cellphone networks after Cell C lowered the rates of its prepaid calls by more than 34%.

Another golf estate victim

May 27 2012 13:09

The oversupply of golf estates has claimed another victim.

MyCiti buses running at a loss

May 28 2012 07:53

The City of Cape Town has spent R175m running the Myciti bus service since the Soccer World Cup compared to an income of R35m, a report says.

 
Share Share line Print
Wellington - The New Zealand Parliament on Thursday passed a law designed to combat global warming that was expected to raise the cost of just about everything and nobody knows by how much.

The law establishing a trading scheme that puts a price on emissions of greenhouse gases is bitterly opposed by most of New Zealand's business sectors, especially farmers, whose methane-belching animals are responsible for nearly half the country's emissions.

Along with New Zealand's small but significant steel and aluminium producers, the farmers said the cost of the law would put them at a disadvantage against their international competitors, whose governments are not in so much of a hurry to fight climate change.

But Prime Minister Helen Clark - who sees the emissions-trading scheme as the defining act of her 9-year-old Labour Party-led administration, which opinion polls indicated is doomed to defeat at the election she must call by mid-November - was defiant to the last.

Whatever the price, the alternative of doing nothing would cost New Zealand more in the long run, she argued.

Despite being a small country of just more than 4 million people, New Zealand is one of the world's biggest exporters of dairy products, meat and kiwi fruit and a prime tourist destination.

Clark said if it did not take a lead in dealing with climate change, it risked being boycotted as a "dirty producer" by world consumers and tourists who are increasingly environmentally conscious.

Whatever the price

She said New Zealand was already being targeted by environmentalists in Britain who were urging consumers not to buy New Zealand products or fly to the country for vacations because of the carbon footprint they would leave.

The legislation was passed in a 63-57 vote in the House of Representatives with the main opposition conservative National Party vowing to change it radically inside nine months if it wins the election.

The National Party supported the legislation when it was first introduced early this year but backed off as opposition from farmers and businesses mounted with warnings of soaring energy costs that could force big industry to relocate overseas and massive job losses.

Environmentalists said the law did not go far enough and was unfair to poor New Zealanders. The Green Party only supported it after negotiating a NZ$1bn compensation package, including subsidies to insulate homes and help pay increased power costs.

The emissions-trading scheme sets limits on the amount of greenhouse gases all sectors of the economy can emit, with those breaching their limits having to buy credits from those below their maximum levels.

It is being introduced gradually with the giant forestry sector accounting for its emissions this year, energy joining up in 2010, transport a year later and the critical agricultural industry being given breathing space until 2013.

Climate Change Minister David Parker told Parliament the scheme was fair and effective and would save the country hundreds of millions of dollars by penalising polluters and rewarding those who cut emissions.

- Sapa

 
 
Comment on this story
0 comments
Comments have been closed for this article.
It pays to know the cost and what you’re getting in return
May 28 2012 09:33

Investors may not have a clue what they’re paying their money managers or they type of service they’re getting, or, whether they can actually negotiate lower fees. (Reuters)

Sasha

"In the short term this is true, Greece will dominate the headlines on a day to day basis, until their next elections when there would be some clarity to answer the question, "What next for Greece?" Amazingly everyone except the politicians seem to be lining themselves up for worst case scenario, b... Read their blog...

Recently updated
Podcasts
The Sishen saga

Legal expert Peter Leon on the increasingly complex legal wrangle over the Sishen Iron Ore mine. Time: 8:17 Listen Here...

Before you list

Is the clarion call of the JSE calling? Listen to Fin24’s expert panel discussion before you list your small business. Time: 17:29

Compare and Buy

Compare and apply for hundreds of financial products from many suppliers.

Credit cards Medical aid Current accounts Think Money

Money Clinic

Money Clinic Do you have a question about your finances? We'll get an expert opinion.
Click here...

Loading...