22 Nov 2016
Sapvia: It is important that the energy debate is one based on facts rather than assumptions and we intend to robustly participate in the public participation process.
In the current fiscally constrained environment, we believe that the additional cost of deviation from this ‘least cost scenario’ should be made public to allow policy makers to make informed value-for-money decisions.
Any additional cost to the South African fiscus that will impact on critical social spending programmes should be debated.
We believe that the ‘build constraint’ placed on renewables should be removed in the IRP models and scenarios in order to reflect the real potential that solar technology can play.
22 Nov 2016
The South African Photovoltaic Industry Association (Sapvia) has welcomed the release of the 2016 update of the long-awaited Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) and urged government to move forward with the renewables implementation.
Sapvia said the updated IRP will give all South Africans the opportunity to interrogate the choices and cost assumptions used by the IRP planners to reach their conclusions regarding technology choices.
"The allocation of 17 600 MW for Solar PV in the 2016 IRP update is a step in the right direction, but falls short of the immense potential South Africa has to offer in this sector.
"Independent modelling, based on up-to-date figures from South Africa’s REIPPPP bidding rounds confirm that renewables are the best policy choice in order to meet South Africa’s energy needs at the least cost, while still maintaining our carbon obligations.
"Evidence shows that the least cost path for South Africa to achieve a sustainable, low carbon, high job creating energy mix is one that contains a large renewable energy component, supplemented with gas fire power. This renewables and gas scenario has been repeatedly seen in our BRICS partners and elsewhere globally."
22 Nov 2016
Koko’s message to South Africans regarding nuclear: "Be dispassionate about it. Take the politics out of it and just consider it on its merit – that’s all that I am asking.
“We (Eskom) are not married to it (nuclear). It must make sense to the country. We must be able to afford it. It must be able to decarbonise the country. It must be able to meet and check all the boxes.”
22 Nov 2016
Koko: It’s not uncommon for the request for proposals for projects like this to request for the funding proposals from the vendors. You are building an outfit here that is going to last 80 years, that you plan to pay back in 25 years. So you have got fundable options. You also have room for equity from original equipment manufacturers.
Then we are
back to the 2008 scenario where you slow it down and you stop. We won’t
hesitate to do that because we have done it in the past. We started it and we
didn’t like the numbers – they were too expensive and we stopped it.
22 Nov 2016
Asked by a journalist if Eskom is going “hell for leather” on nuclear, Koko replied: “Not at all”. He said the plan is 9 600 MW. “But we have always said that we will build in chunks that we can afford”.
22 Nov 2016
Why Eskom will release request for proposals this year:
Matshela Koko, Eskom’s group executive for generation: It is very important for us to go into the market so that we are able to go back to give cabinet what the best rollout is, including localisation, including the funding options. It’s quite important that we do that, otherwise, we keep guessing.
22 Nov 2016
The SA Renewable Energy Council has welcomed the IRP update assumptions and base case: "It has been common knowledge that the IRP2010 has been outdated since 2013. The 2013 update report has still not made it into policy and we hope that the 2016 update report will be realised within the timeframes put forward by the department i.e. with promulgation of the updated IRP shortly after March 2017.
The IRP is based on a set of important assumptions which inform model outputs and which in turn determine the country’s electricity investment decision-making to 2030. Two of the most important assumptions from our perspective are: demand and RE costs. The assumptions made on these have a direct bearing on what the model selects for investment.
The IRP2016 update published today clearly takes current data related to these assumptions into account, and in addition, extends the planning horizon to 2050.
We encourage all South Africans interested in South Africa’s development future, to engage with the IRP consultation process and to ensure that the IRP promulgated is reflective of rational planning, particularly as this relates to costs, job creation and economic sustainability."
22 Nov 2016
22 Nov 2016
Mackay: Low cost electricity is vital to grow industry, create jobs and end unemployment.
Necsa’s comments should be limited to the multi-purpose reactor, for which they are responsible at Pelindaba. Eskom’s view that nuclear should be procured as soon as possible should be taken in light of the public protector's report on state capture and implications on Eskom board. The DOE retains for energy planning within SA. Any attempts by Eskom to usurp that role should be strongly objected.
Today’s IRP and IEP if accepted will provide a legal and statuary framework against which nuclear procurement can be evaluated. Eskom will find it incredibly hard to justify a purchase of 9.6GW of nuclear capacity within 24 months, against an IRP plan which says such procurement should be limited to 1.8GW and should be delivered in 2037.
The IRP
should be finalised by mid-2017, according to the DOE.
22 Nov 2016
Democratic Alliance MP Gordon Mackay on the IRP:
The minister should be supported for producing an IRP that clearly indicated that nuclear is not a requirement until the mid-2030s.
This stands in sharp contrast to the spin put out by Eskom, which has falsely punted the urgent need for nuclear procurement in the next 24 months.
The department’s assumptions on nuclear are aligned with nuclear experts within SA and clearly indicates that gas should be considered as a cheaper base load priority and supports a more aggressive adoption of renewables.
Of concern in the presentation by the department, was that it did not include the assessment of the impact of the electricity pricing path, because consumers will like to know what they are going to pay for government’s decisions.
22 Nov 2016
22 Nov 2016
22 Nov 2016
22 Nov 2016
22 Nov 2016
Dr Kelvin Kemm, chairperson of government owned Nuclear Energy Corporation (Necsa) says the new proposed energy plan is a complete surprise: “The energy discussion document of the DOE which proposes a major delay in the introduction of nuclear power has come as a complete surprise to Necsa. At no stage were we consulted by the DOE on this proposal.”
The DOE document relies heavily on gas as a base power source. Gas is one commodity which South Africa does not have and so vast amounts of gas would have to be imported. There is also no explanation as to where the giant gas power stations would be built and how gas would be transported to them, Kemm said.
22 Nov 2016
More questions from Safcei's Liz McDaid: A whole bunch of energy experts say we don’t need nuclear, but now Eskom is still going ahead with a proposal. In who’s interest in Eskom acting?
The IRP 2013 which was put out for comment, also raised the risk of nuclear energy. Then that disappeared.
Now we have another plan, which is actually more wary of
nuclear. So where is this going to go? Will it follow the fate of the 2013 IRP?
22 Nov 2016
Liz McDaid: In 2011, they said renewables were too expensive. Now we’ve proved they work, now we are told the Eskom grid infrastructure grid can’t take it. Why in every other country that is doing renewable energy, is this not a constraint?
We see government’s reluctance for more nuclear and a reluctance to invest in renewables. Eskom will issue a request for proposals for a scenario.
Will they bring in more renewables as well? What signal does that send the market?
Mace produced a report – it’s confidential and we call on that to be made public. That report did not include nuclear.
22 Nov 2016
Safcei spokesperson Liz McDaid responds to new energy plan:
We think it’s a good idea that nuclear has been delayed to 2037 in the base case. There is space to consider the different options to come up with the least cost scenario for South Africa.
The IRP has been predetermined. The energy efficiency assumptions in the base case is base as usual. If you do no energy efficiency and you constrain the amount of renewables, you artificially shift your IRP to bring on more coal and nuclear. You would assume that the base case is the government’s best guess.
Now they are offering everyone an opportunity to comment. If you have a more climate friendly option, you then need to reduce coal and increase nuclear.
If you had to unconstrain renewable energy and increase energy efficiency, then you would find that the climate friendly option would drop coal and nuclear. We have seen Eskom’s reluctance to do renewable energy, now we see the DoE saying the grid can’t take more renewables. This is another excuse.
22 Nov 2016
“The ratings agencies biggest concern with the nuclear plan would be the cost of it, and the amount of debt that the government has to carry for it,” Christie Viljoen, an economist at KPMG told Bloomberg.
“The ratings agencies view is over three to five years, so this makes a positive change to that outlook."
22 Nov 2016
Quick summary from Fin24's Liesl Peyper:
Cape Town: South Africa will have nuclear energy at 2037 at the latest, the latest draft Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) shows.
In addition, the Department of Energy will issue a request for proposal for a nuclear build programme before the end of this year.
A delegation from the Department of Energy, including Energy Minister Tina Joemat-Pettersson, and Eskom’s Matshela Koko, briefed the media on particulars of South Africa’s draft plans for energy and electricity generation that will be released for public comment on Friday 25 November.
The revised IRP sets out a significantly reduced coal requirement compared to the 2011 IRP. Coal and nuclear energy, however, will still be the principle source for base load energy.
22 Nov 2016
Rand stronger on latest SA energy plans and favourable emerging market sentiment. Unit now trading at R14.08/$, that's 1.17% firmer than the previous close.
22 Nov 2016
Matshela Koko, Eskom’s group executive for generation, says Brian Molefe is the best person for the job as Eskom CEO.
Listen to the full interview:
22 Nov 2016
22 Nov 2016
22 Nov 2016
22 Nov 2016
22 Nov 2016
22 Nov 2016
How Reuters reported the IRP news to the world:
South Africa says to boost nuclear, renewable power
South Africa plans significant increases in nuclear, wind and solar power output over the next three decades to meet growing electricity demand, a government document released on Tuesday showed.
South Africa will increase nuclear power output by 1 359 megawatts (MW) by 2037 and 20,385 MW by 2050, the document said. A further 37 400 MW of wind and 17 600 MW of solar power will also be added to the grid, it said.
22 Nov 2016
22 Nov 2016
22 Nov 2016
22 Nov 2016
22 Nov 2016
How Bloomberg reported the IRP news to the global business community:
South Africa Delays Nuclear Plant Plan as Economy Stagnates
South Africa delayed plans to build new nuclear power plants over concern about their cost and the waning demand for additional electricity as economic growth stalls.Under a new timeline, the first nuclear power is expected to come on stream in 2037, with a total 20,385 megawatts of nuclear energy added to the national grid by 2050, according to the “base case” scenario outlined in a presentation on the Department of Energy’s updated Integrated Resources Plan.
The proposal, released in Cape Town on Tuesday, also estimates as additional 37,400 megawatts of power from wind, 17,600 megawatts from solar plants, 35,292 megawatts from gas and 15,000 megawatts from coal by 2050.
The government previously said it wanted to generate 9,600 megawatts of energy from as many as eight reactors that should begin operating from 2023 and be completed by 2029. Price estimates had ranged from $37 billion to $100 billion.
While President Jacob Zuma has championed the nuclear program, the Treasury has cautioned that the country may be unable to afford new reactors at a time when the economy is barely growing and the budget deficit needs to be curbed to fend off a junk credit rating.“Gas and renewables forms the biggest chunk of installed capacity by 2050,” the Department of Energy said in the presentation.
“There is significant reduction in installed capacity from coal.”
The department, which has invited public comment on the proposals, also outlines two alternative scenarios that make different assumptions about costs, carbon emissions and the nation’s ability to generate additional renewable energy.
One envisions 25,821 megawatts of nuclear power added to the grid between 2026 and 2049, while the other sees the production of 5,436 megawatts of new atomic power coming on line starting in 2037.
Power CutsThe energy plan will be refined in March next year and then submitted to the cabinet for final sign-off.
Eskom, the state-owned utility, has said it could use the more than 150 billion rand ($10.5 billion) it will accumulate in reserves within 10 years to build new reactors. The utility operates Africa’s only nuclear power plant - the 1,800-megawatt Koeberg facility near Cape Town, which began operating in 1984.
Rosatom, Areva, EDF, Toshiba’s Westinghouse Electric unit, China Guangdong Nuclear Power Holding and Korea Electric Power previously expressed interest in building new reactors in South Africa.
South Africa experienced power cuts for about 100 days last year, as demand exceeded supply. Energy shortages eased as new generating capacity was bought on line, maintenance backlogs were addressed and a stagnating economy curbed power demand.
22 Nov 2016
22 Nov 2016
22 Nov 2016