Share

CEOs take pay cuts as investors keep watch on wages

London - Bosses of Britain’s public companies rarely look forward to facing off with their shareholders, but the run-up to this year’s annual general meeting season is provoking a particularly strong sense of anxiety.

Executive pay is high on the political agenda, with the government wrapping up a consultation exercise on the issue just last month and Prime Minister Theresa May repeatedly framing Brexit as a vote for a fairer society.

With a spate of executive pay policies coming up for renewal in coming weeks, some companies are responding to the pressure by cutting bosses’ remuneration. Others are banging on the doors of shareholders from Aberdeen Asset Management to Legal & General Investment Management, asking them to look at pay proposals before they’re put to a vote - even when they’ve had no problems in the past.

"There’s scrutiny on executive remuneration by everyone," said Eugenia Jackson, head of corporate governance research at Allianz Global Investors, who’s been consulting with companies her firm has stakes in.

"When we see that a company is underperforming and are still paying for when times were good, it makes it difficult for us to be supportive."

About three-quarters of FTSE 100 companies are due to renew their pay policies this year, and with remuneration now having to go to a mandatory vote, there’s a real risk of them being voted down. With many of the UK’s biggest shareholders signalling that excessive pay won’t be tolerated, the stage looks set for a turbulent AGM season.

Exerting pressure

L&G, the UK’s largest manager of pension assets, is leading a group of investors calling for companies to publish the pay ratios of senior managers versus employees in their annual reports.

BlackRock, the world’s biggest asset manager, added to the pressure in January by urging the chairmen of 300 top companies to curtail excessive increases.

May called the pay gap "unhealthy" when she was campaigning for the Conservative Party leadership last July.

A FTSE 100 boss earned 128 times more than an average employee in 2015, up from 47 times in 1998, while CEO pay jumped to £4.3m a year from about £1m, government data show.

Companies are starting to respond in an attempt to avoid embarrassing shareholder revolts, government censure and, potentially, tougher legislation.

'We hear you'

Anglo American, which last year saw its pay proposal opposed by more than 40% of shareholders, has curbed how much top executives can benefit from spikes in the share price.

BP is widely expected to make adjustments to its policy after shareholders rejected its pay deal last year, while cigarette manufacturer Imperial Brands in January dropped plans to give CEO Alison Cooper a multi-million pound raise, heading off a potential shareholder rebellion.

"More companies are saying, we hear you, and here are the changes you asked for," said Sacha Sedan, director of corporate governance at L&G’s investment unit.

"Last year’s remuneration votes had an effect, but so did the PM’s speech, the government’s green paper on corporate governance and Imperial Brands’s decision."

Not every company is in the mood to compromise. The bosses of AstraZeneca and Royal Dutch Shell have both had their pay increased by more than 60%, while Rolls-Royce Holdings awarded its chief a near £1m bonus after profit dropped by almost half, drawing criticism from the Institute of Directors.

"If a guy was hired on a certain salary and on a certain long-term pay structure, then why do we need to see those numbers trickling upwards?" said Paul Lee, head of corporate governance at Aberdeen, which voted against 9% of pay resolutions last year.

"There needn’t be an assumption that it will always inexorably rise."

Wider concerns

The next test of shareholders’ militancy comes on Thursday, with the AGM of house builder Crest Nicholson Holdings. A significant vote against pay proposals is widely anticipated. The AGM season then starts in earnest in April.

While companies have been preoccupied with remuneration, the reappointment of non-executive directors is also expected to attract attention. Investors including AGI want to see more diversity and breadth of expertise on company boards.

And others, like Hermes Investment Management, will be paying close attention to disclosure on climate-change policies, particularly in the mining and energy sectors.

"I expect to see a tough season and to see higher votes against companies," AGI’s Jackson said. "Investors are growing impatient about changes to company practices.

It’s about credibility and real risk for the perception of those businesses."

Read Fin24's top stories trending on Twitter:

We live in a world where facts and fiction get blurred
Who we choose to trust can have a profound impact on our lives. Join thousands of devoted South Africans who look to News24 to bring them news they can trust every day. As we celebrate 25 years, become a News24 subscriber as we strive to keep you informed, inspired and empowered.
Join News24 today
heading
description
username
Show Comments ()
Rand - Dollar
18.97
-0.1%
Rand - Pound
24.13
-0.1%
Rand - Euro
20.63
-0.2%
Rand - Aus dollar
12.40
+0.2%
Rand - Yen
0.13
+0.2%
Platinum
912.00
-1.2%
Palladium
1,021.38
-4.2%
Gold
2,161.57
+0.1%
Silver
25.12
+0.3%
Brent Crude
86.89
+1.8%
Top 40
66,252
0.0%
All Share
72,430
0.0%
Resource 10
53,317
0.0%
Industrial 25
100,473
0.0%
Financial 15
16,622
0.0%
All JSE data delayed by at least 15 minutes Iress logo
Company Snapshot
Editorial feedback and complaints

Contact the public editor with feedback for our journalists, complaints, queries or suggestions about articles on News24.

LEARN MORE
Government tenders

Find public sector tender opportunities in South Africa here.

Government tenders
This portal provides access to information on all tenders made by all public sector organisations in all spheres of government.
Browse tenders