Register now for Fin24 Dashboard and get access to portfolios, watchlists, financial comparison tools, and a whole lot more to help you achieve your financial goals.

Data provided by McGregor BFA
All data is delayed
Loading...
Where am I? Home
 
Prices are delayed by 15min.
Join the Fin24.com conversation about JSE-listed stock by using every time you tweet.

Verdict in winemaker, Land Bank case soon

Feb 21 2011 13:46 Sapa

Related Articles

Winemaker, Land Bank in legal clash

Concourt to hear wine estate appeal

Land Bank to repossess 557 farms

Land Bank legal action on hold

Gordhan: Land Bank on new path

Three arrested for Land Bank fraud

 

Top Stories

Cell C move sparks price war

May 27 2012 11:21

There's a price war raging between South Africa's cellphone networks after Cell C lowered the rates of its prepaid calls by more than 34%.

Another golf estate victim

May 27 2012 13:09

The oversupply of golf estates has claimed another victim.

MyCiti buses running at a loss

May 28 2012 07:53

The City of Cape Town has spent R175m running the Myciti bus service since the Soccer World Cup compared to an income of R35m, a report says.

 
Share Share line Print
Bloemfontein - Judgment will be delivered by the Constitutional Court on Tuesday in the dispute between well-known winemaker Nicolas Krone, from Twee Jonge Gezellen, and the Land Bank.

The matter relates to R37.9m the Land Bank was demanding from Krone and Twee Jonge Gezellen.

The Land Bank submitted that Krone and his company signed an acknowledgement of debt for that amount in the Land Bank's favour.

The bank obtained a provisional order from the High Court in Cape Town that the money be paid within two months.

Krone argued in the Constitutional Court that the legal process of provisional court orders was unconstitutional.

He submitted that the provisional court order deprived him and his company of the right to prove in court that, among other things, the amount owed was actually R20m.

The law requires a full payment of the provisional order to the Land Bank before the case can proceed.

Krone and his company argued that the provisional order was unconstitutional because it limited their right of access to courts and because it allowed only those who can pay to defend the action.

In so doing, it denied those who could not pay equal protection and benefit of the law.

Krone and Twee Jonge Gezellen indicated that they could not pay the full amount.

The Land Bank argued that provisional order procedure did not infringe on the applicants' fair hearing and equality rights.
 

 
 
Comment on this story
0 comments
Add your comment
Comment 0 characters remaining
It pays to know the cost and what you’re getting in return
May 28 2012 09:33

Investors may not have a clue what they’re paying their money managers or they type of service they’re getting, or, whether they can actually negotiate lower fees. (Reuters)

Sasha

"In the short term this is true, Greece will dominate the headlines on a day to day basis, until their next elections when there would be some clarity to answer the question, "What next for Greece?" Amazingly everyone except the politicians seem to be lining themselves up for worst case scenario, b... Read their blog...

Recently updated
Podcasts
The Sishen saga

Legal expert Peter Leon on the increasingly complex legal wrangle over the Sishen Iron Ore mine. Time: 8:17 Listen Here...

Before you list

Is the clarion call of the JSE calling? Listen to Fin24’s expert panel discussion before you list your small business. Time: 17:29

Compare and Buy

Compare and apply for hundreds of financial products from many suppliers.

Credit cards Medical aid Current accounts Think Money

Money Clinic

Money Clinic Do you have a question about your finances? We'll get an expert opinion.
Click here...

Loading...