• 10 tips to find bargains

    Susan Erasmus gives advice on how bargain hunters can get the most bang for their buck.

  • Inside Labour

    Labour's bitter breaches need to be seen in historical context, says Terry Bell.

  • Rich getting richer

    Economists differ on how to tackle the chasm between rich and poor, says Leopold Scholtz.

See More

Concourt rules against Coega landowner

Nov 18 2010 18:39 Sapa

Related Articles

Commission's fuel supply dilemma

Tax holiday for Coega - Jourdan

'State still supports Coega'

'Land grab' to help Coega

Coega in for R16bn India boost

Coega plan to boost electricity


Pretoria - The owner of about 505 hectares of land within the Coega Industrial Development Zone was never deprived of his property rights, despite threats of expropriation by the Coega Development Corporation, the Constitutional Court ruled on Thursday.

The court also ruled that it would not issue an order compelling Coega Development Corporation (CDC), Eastern Cape Premier Noxolo Kiviet and the Public Works Minister to expropriate the land belonging to Offit Enterprises within a specified time.

In the case before the Concourt, Offit claimed that there were threats of expropriation by the developer and two previous unsuccessful attempts at expropriation.

Offit had previously failed to get the order that it sought in the high court and the Supreme Court of Appeal.

CDC argued that the mention of expropriation did not amount to an interference in its property rights.

In a unanimous judgment the Concourt upheld the order of the Supreme Court of Appeal, and dismissed the appeal with costs.

Justice Thembile Skweyiya noted that "It is by now clear that the threats of expropriation were made by the CDC which has no power to expropriate, and which has yet to make any application for expropriation. CDC and the other respondents would still need to comply with the legal and administrative requirements for a valid expropriation if the threats were ever to come to fruition."

He said only the Minister of Public Works had the power to authorise any expropriation.

"The crux of the issue is whether the series of conduct of which the applicants complain has deprived the applicants of the full use and enjoyment of their property to such an extent that it amounts to a deprivation. There has been no deprivation of property."

He said the actions of the CDC in his opinion amounted to nothing more than "forceful bargaining".



Read Fin24’s Comments Policy

24.com publishes all comments posted on articles provided that they adhere to our Comments Policy. Should you wish to report a comment for editorial review, please do so by clicking the 'Report Comment' button to the right of each comment.

Comment on this story
Add your comment
Comment 0 characters remaining

Company Snapshot

Brought to you by BizNews

More from BizNews

We're talking about:


Johannesburg has been selected to host the Global Entrepreneurship Congress in 2017. "[The congress] will ensure that small business development remains firmly on the national agenda and the radar screen of all stakeholders, the Small Business Development minister said.

Top 10 richest musicians of all time

Check out the gallery to find out who they are!


Luxury living

Seven of the most expensive children's toys ever made
5 millionaires turned murderers
The youngest billionaires in the world and how they made it
Watch: Flying first class has never been this luxurious!

Money Clinic

Money Clinic
Do you have a question about your finances? We'll get an expert opinion.
Click here...

Voting Booth

How do you see your boss? He/sheis:

Previous results · Suggest a vote