• Change of culture needed

    The right leadership will help SA shed its culture of violence, says Mandi Smallhorne.

  • 10 tips to find bargains

    Susan Erasmus gives advice on how bargain hunters can get the most bang for their buck.

  • Inside Labour

    Labour's bitter breaches need to be seen in historical context, says Terry Bell.

Loading...
See More

Smokers' rights in ashes

Jun 20 2012 15:35 Sapa

Related Articles

Smokers, drinkers to choke on hike

Cigarette tax soars, luxury cars hit

BAT launches budget tobacco brand

BAT gains from price hikes as Q3 rebounds

Millions of cigarettes shredded

BAT challenges Australian packaging laws

 

Johannesburg - The Supreme Court of Appeal (SCA) found on Wednesday that the health hazards of smoking outweigh the interests of smokers as a group.

The SCA dismissed an appeal against an order by the North Gauteng High Court brought by British American Tobacco of South Africa (Batsa).

The appeal concerned the proper interpretation of section 3(1) (a) of the Tobacco Products Control Act, as amended by the Tobacco Products Amendment Act, which relates to a prohibition on the promotion and advertising of tobacco products.

Batsa approached the high court for a proper interpretation of section three of the act.

It argued that in terms of section 16 of the constitution, the impugned prohibition limits the company's right to engage in commercial expression and the right to freedom of expression of tobacco consumers.

Batsa further argued tobacco consumers were denied the right to receive information concerning tobacco products.

It sought a high court order that the impugned provision did not apply to one-to-one communications between tobacco manufacturers, importers, wholesalers and retailers, and consenting adult tobacco consumers.

The SCA said the appeal was whether the limitations were reasonable and justifiable in an open democratic society. This included the nature and extent of the limitations as required by section 36 of the constitution.

The court held it had to consider the rights of smokers to receive information concerning the tobacco product and the government's obligation to take steps to protect its citizens from the hazardous and damaging effects of tobacco.

It found there were powerful public health considerations for a ban on advertising and promoting tobacco products, and that the seriousness of the hazards of smoking far outweighed the interests of smokers as a group.

The SCA further held that South Africa also had international law obligations to ban tobacco advertising and promotion.

The judgment found the prohibition on advertising and promotion of tobacco products was reasonable and justifiable as required by the constitution.

smokers  |  tobacco  |  supreme court of appeal

NEXT ON FIN24X

 
 
 

Read Fin24’s Comments Policy

24.com publishes all comments posted on articles provided that they adhere to our Comments Policy. Should you wish to report a comment for editorial review, please do so by clicking the 'Report Comment' button to the right of each comment.

Comment on this story
138 comments
Add your comment
Comment 0 characters remaining
 

Company Snapshot

Brought to you by BizNews

More from BizNews

We're talking about:

SMALL BUSINESS

Johannesburg has been selected to host the Global Entrepreneurship Congress in 2017. "[The congress] will ensure that small business development remains firmly on the national agenda and the radar screen of all stakeholders, the Small Business Development minister said.
 
 

Top 10 richest musicians of all time

Check out the gallery to find out who they are!

 
 

Luxury living

10 most expensive cars In the world
10 of the most expensive things that will leave your jaw hanging!
Seven of the most expensive children's toys ever made
5 millionaires turned murderers

Money Clinic

Money Clinic
Do you have a question about your finances? We'll get an expert opinion.
Click here...

Voting Booth

How do you see your boss? He/sheis:

Previous results · Suggest a vote

Loading...