• SABC shenanigans

    SA has already embarked on a slippery slope to autocracy, warns Terry Bell in Inside Labour.

  • Zim tastes people power

    Protests in Zimbabwe are forcing Mugabe to face anti-government sentiment, says Memory Mataranyika.

  • Platinum handshake

    Officials who try to do what's right risk far more than blessed wrongdoers, says Solly Moeng.

All data is delayed
Loading...
See More

Sanral appeal in toll tender succeeds

Sep 12 2013 16:49
Sapa

Bloemfontein - The SA National Roads Agency's appeal regarding operation and maintenance of the N2 South Coast toll plaza was upheld in the Supreme Court of Appeal (SCA) on Thursday.

Sanral appealed against a high court judgment reviewing and setting aside a tender awarded for the operation and maintenance of the plaza.

The agency had invited tenders for the operation of the plaza and four tenders had been received.

The contract was awarded to Tolcon Lehumo.

A consortium of three companies operating under the name of The Toll Collect Consortium was dissatisfied and brought review proceedings in the High Court in Durban.

The review succeeded but Sanral appealed to the SCA.

On Thursday, the SCA held that judicial review was not a means of obtaining a fresh evaluation of the assessment of competing tenders and the decision to award a tender.

Judge Malcolm Wallis ruled, in a unanimous full-bench decision, a judicial review was a mechanism to ensure that obligations imposed on public bodies by the Constitution and legislation were observed when tenders were awarded.

"The court could only interfere if the process was infected with illegality," he said.

The court would not hesitate to interfere with the awarding of a tender where there was impropriety or corruption.

However, where the complaints were merely about the result of the evaluation of a tender a court would be reluctant to intervene.

The SCA found in this matter the challenge to the evaluation of the tenders was essentially an invitation to the court to re-assess The Toll Collect Consortium’s tender.

This invitation should be declined, the court held.


Follow Fin24 on Twitter, Facebook, Google+ and Pinterest.v

sanral  |  supreme court of appeal  |  tolls

 
 
 

Read Fin24’s Comments Policy

24.com publishes all comments posted on articles provided that they adhere to our Comments Policy. Should you wish to report a comment for editorial review, please do so by clicking the 'Report Comment' button to the right of each comment.

Comment on this story
6 comments
Comments have been closed for this article.
 

Company Snapshot

We're talking about:

THE SAVINGS ISSUE

Saving can make a lot of things possible, but we all know how hard it is to save. This special Savings Issue will help you get focused.
 

Money Clinic

Money Clinic
Do you have a question about your finances? We'll get an expert opinion.
Click here...

Voting Booth

Sarb's decision to keep the repo rate unchanged is:

Previous results · Suggest a vote

Loading...