Loading...
See More

SA takes heat for burning coal

Mar 29 2011 07:09 AFP

Related Articles

Carbon tax could hurt business, consumers

UN unveils vision for global 'green economy'

Proposed green energy subsidies cut

IDC to invest R10bn in green jobs

Govt to buy green power

SA to rely more on nuclear, green power

 
Johannesburg - The global fight over fossil fuels has hit home in South Africa as the coal-dependent country debates its energy future before hosting UN climate talks later this year.

South Africa is overhauling its energy policy, looking to more than double its power supply by adding more than 50 000 megawatts of electricity to the grid at a cost of R860bn.

But as it seeks to ease power shortages that caused paralysing blackouts in 2008, environmentalists say it is not doing enough to cut its reliance on coal-fired power - currently more than 90% of the electricity supply.

The scrutiny is intensifying as South Africa prepares to host the next major round of United Nations climate talks in the eastern port city of Durban from November 28 to December 9.

The talks - the successor to the Kyoto Protocol and last year's conference in Cancun, Mexico - will see global leaders try to make meaningful progress toward a binding international agreement to curb climate change.

The meetings will be key in deciding the future of the Kyoto emissions targets, which expire next year.

Environmentalists say South African President Jacob Zuma faces embarrassment at the talks if his government doesn't move to massively slash the country's dependence on coal.

"What is the president going to do?" asked Richard Worthington, head of the climate programme at World Wildlife Fund South Africa.

"Say, 'Oh, welcome to South Africa, we want to play a leadership role on climate change. But excuse us, we're not going to do what we said we'd do in Copenhagen and Cancun.' I don't think the president wants to be in that position."

South Africa had pledged at the 2009 talks in Copenhagen to cut emissions 42% by 2025. But the country's draft energy plan proposed cutting carbon emissions just 30% by 2030.

Zuma's cabinet last week approved a new version of the plan that officials said would scale up renewable and nuclear energy, with new power generation coming 42% from renewable sources, 23% from nuclear and just 15% from coal.

But the full plan will not be released until late March, and it is still unclear what emissions levels or the final electricity mix will be.

"It appears that the department of energy would like to portray themselves as being more serious about renewables than they really are," Worthington said.

South Africa has announced plans to develop the world's largest solar project, a 5 000-megawatt plant in the arid Northern Cape province, and is betting heavily on nuclear power.

But it has also been criticised for forging ahead with construction of the new 4 800-megawatt Medupi coal-fired power plant.

Greenpeace Africa called on the continent's biggest polluter - South Africa emits 38% of Africa's carbon - to set an example by cutting its coal use.

"The true cost of coal has not been determined. It might seem cheap now, but it's really not. There's no such thing as clean coal," said Greenpeace Africa spokesperson Fiona Musana.

"Come Durban, Greenpeace will be looking to South Africa to really show the steps that it's been taking. We'll be holding them to account."

But Latsoucabe Fall, Africa manager for the 93-country World Energy Council, said it is unfair to ask South Africa to abandon coal and risk falling behind other emerging economies.

"South Africa is well-endowed in coal resources. It cannot abandon coal resources. China is not abandoning coal. India is not abandoning coal," he said.

"Clean energy should be developed in Africa, but this should not compromise the development of the continent."

eskom  |  medupi  |  coal  |  electricity  |  energy  |  green energy
NEXT ON FIN24X

 
 
 

Read Fin24’s Comments Policy

24.com publishes all comments posted on articles provided that they adhere to our Comments Policy. Should you wish to report a comment for editorial review, please do so by clicking the 'Report Comment' button to the right of each comment.

Comment on this story
9 comments
Add your comment
Comment 0 characters remaining
 

Company Snapshot

sponsored content
Sanral arrogant and evasive - JPSA 2014-09-04 09:13

Lawyers representing Justice Project SA have labelled responses they received from Sanral's legal team relating to e-tolls as surprisingly arrogant and evasive.

We're talking about:

Small Business

Retailers of any shape and size can now unlock the power of mobile transacting.
 

Money Clinic

Money Clinic
Do you have a question about your finances? We'll get an expert opinion.
Click here...
Loading...