• SABC shenanigans

    SA has already embarked on a slippery slope to autocracy, warns Terry Bell in Inside Labour.

  • Zim tastes people power

    Protests in Zimbabwe are forcing Mugabe to face anti-government sentiment, says Memory Mataranyika.

  • Platinum handshake

    Officials who try to do what's right risk far more than blessed wrongdoers, says Solly Moeng.

All data is delayed
Loading...
See More

SA court dismisses Zim land grab appeal

Jun 27 2013 17:21
Sapa

Johannesburg - The Zimbabwe government lost a Constitutional Court appeal on Thursday against a SADC Tribunal costs order awarded to a group of farmers who challenged the loss of their land.

The court dismissed the Zimbabwe government's appeal against a decision of the Supreme Court of Appeal in the matter.

The farmers' land was expropriated by the Zimbabwe government in terms of that country's land reform policy. The farmers approached the Southern African Development Community (SADC) Tribunal for relief and the tribunal decided in their favour.

Zimbabwe failed to comply with its decision. The farmers again approached the tribunal for relief. The tribunal found in their favour and granted a costs order against Zimbabwe. Again Zimbabwe failed to comply.

The farmers approached the North Gauteng High Court in Pretoria for the registration and enforcement of the costs order in South Africa.

The court ordered the registration and execution of the costs order against the Zimbabwe government's property in Cape Town and Johannesburg.

Zimbabwe's high court application for the rescission of the order was dismissed.

Zimbabwe appealed unsuccessfully to the SCA and approached the Constitutional Court, which also dismissed its application.

The majority of judges held that the Constitution enjoined South Africa's courts to develop the common law to facilitate the enjoyment of the rights provided for in the Bill of Rights.

The court said Zimbabwe’s agreement to be bound by the Tribunal Protocol, including article 32, constituted an express waiver in terms of section 3(1) of the Immunities Against States Act.



Follow Fin24 on Twitter, Facebook, Google+ and Pinterest.

sadc  |  zimbabwe  |  land

 
 
 

Read Fin24’s Comments Policy

24.com publishes all comments posted on articles provided that they adhere to our Comments Policy. Should you wish to report a comment for editorial review, please do so by clicking the 'Report Comment' button to the right of each comment.

Comment on this story
5 comments
Comments have been closed for this article.
 

Company Snapshot

We're talking about:

THE SAVINGS ISSUE

Saving can make a lot of things possible, but we all know how hard it is to save. This special Savings Issue will help you get focused.
 

Money Clinic

Money Clinic
Do you have a question about your finances? We'll get an expert opinion.
Click here...

Voting Booth

Sarb's decision to keep the repo rate unchanged is:

Previous results · Suggest a vote

Loading...