Loading...
See More

Presidency: IMF contribution not a gift

Jun 20 2012 08:26 Sapa

Related Articles

Cosatu condemns SA's IMF donation

SA commits $2bn to IMF rescue fund

Brics agree to boost IMF war chest

How Europe can save itself

IMF chief riles Greeks

Europe vows closer union at G20

 

Cape Town - South Africa's $2bn (about R16.4bn) commitment to an International Monetary Fund (IMF) firewall is not a gift but a sound financial investment, the presidency said on Wednesday.

"If the IMF uses the funds, the money is lent to the IMF and not a gift... (and) for all of this time the money will be earning interest for South Africa," President Jacob Zuma's spokesperson Mac Maharaj said.

"The capital of the loan will ultimately be repaid to South Africa. It's like lending money to a very strong bank. This is not a risky loan."

Zuma committed some of South Africa's reserves at the G20 summit, a meeting of the world's greatest economies, in Los Cabos, Mexico on Monday.

At least $430bn had been set aside to stave off the risk of another financial crisis, which would likely lead to a sharp decrease in global growth and rising unemployment.

IMF members could access the funds through a temporary loan, with conditions, and the reserves were not earmarked for any region.

While the news was welcomed by Business Unity SA as an important step in maintaining stable economic growth, the Congress of SA Trade Unions felt South Africa should be a beneficiary rather than a contributor.

"The decision must be reversed and the $2bn used to alleviate the plight of the poorest South Africans and to invest in the restructuring of our economy," spokesperson Patrick Craven said.

Maharaj reiterated that the funds were part of foreign reserves, did not require an additional budgetary allocation and were critical in keeping the rand stable.

"If the global economy falls sharply, there is a serious risk that we will lose more jobs. In the last global recession we lost one million jobs. Our contribution to the IMF is intended to help stave off this kind of crisis happening again."

The wealth of a country is not necessarily an indicator for how much should be set aside for the IMF, he said.

China has a lower per capita income than South Africa and yet has set aside $43bn.

India is "considerably poorer" and is allocating $10bn.

"Like China and India, South Africa is a responsible global citizen. We are in the G20 to support global stabilisation and growth. We need to continue to do our duty."

 
imf  |  jacob zuma  |  sa economy  |  g20 summit
NEXT ON FIN24X

 
 
 

Read Fin24’s Comments Policy

24.com publishes all comments posted on articles provided that they adhere to our Comments Policy. Should you wish to report a comment for editorial review, please do so by clicking the 'Report Comment' button to the right of each comment.

Comment on this story
24 comments
Add your comment
Comment 0 characters remaining
 

Company Snapshot

We're talking about:

Small Business

New forms of digital technology are changing the very ways in which entrepreneurs run their businesses.
 
 

New GIF keyboard on iOS for added fun!

Soon sending an LOL! or facepalm will be so much more fun!

 
 

For chic geeks...

Puppy goes crazy over iPad game
Printable solar panels will bring exciting new opportunities!
Now there’s a special lane for texting while walking
LOL! 7 brutally honest texts from parents

Money Clinic

Money Clinic
Do you have a question about your finances? We'll get an expert opinion.
Click here...
Loading...