• Three cheers for Thuli

    Where are South Africa’s men and women of honour, asks Mandi Smallhorne.

  • Structure your pension

    An expert explains the ins and outs of different types of retirement annuities.

  • Inside Labour

    Without radical policy change SA's social fabric will continue to fray, says Terry Bell.

Data provided by iNet BFA
Loading...
See More

Outa files its e-toll appeal

Jan 09 2013 10:31 Sapa
Tolls protest

Tolls protest (Picture: AP)

Related Articles

Outa can't win e-tolls fight - expert

Outa mulls over e-toll judgment appeal

Cosatu: Don't buy e-tags

Govt cars to register for e-tolling

Duvenhage: Outa's challenge excellent

Outa steps up e-toll fight

 

Johannesburg - The Opposition to Urban Tolling Alliance has filed its appeal against e-tolls in the North Gauteng High Court, the organisation said on Wednesday. 

Outa chairperson Musa Strachan said the application for leave to appeal was filed in court on Tuesday. 

"Outa members firmly believe that the grounds and merits of this appeal are very strong and that leaving the judgment unchallenged will set a significantly erroneous precedent." 

Strachan said the constitutional interpretation of Section 27 of the Sanral Act required that the SA National Roads Agency Limited (Sanral) should have given adequate notice to the public of the proposed project. 

The appeal follows a judgment on December 13 by the High Court in Pretoria which dismissed an application by Outa to have the electronic tolling of Gauteng's major roads scrapped. 

The court ordered Outa to pay the legal costs of the application. Outa also intended appealing this order. 

The appeal had to be lodged with the court by January 9. 

"Public participation requires that sufficient information about the project must be provided .... such that those impacted are empowered with knowledge and time to have the ability, if so required, to exert a possible effect on the outcome of the decision," he said. 

Strachan said in the e-tolling case, public participation was not possible "yet the court ruled that public engagement was sufficient and adequate". 

In this regard, Outa maintains that procedural and objective fairness had not been applied, making e-tolls introduction unlawful, he said. 

The judgment also erroneously relied on a minority judgment from the Constitutional Court ruling and thereby misrepresented and ignored crucial aspects of Outa's case. 

"This misinterpretation of the Constitutional Court judgment had the effect of setting aside Outa's argument that the Minister of Transport's decision was irrational because his approval was conducted without knowledge of e-toll collection costs," he said. 

Outa's founding members are the SA Vehicle Renting and Leasing Association, the SA Tourism Service Association, Retail Motor Industries of SA, the Quadpara Association of SA, and the SA National Consumers Union.



 

Follow Fin24 on Twitter, Facebook, Google+ and Pinterest.

NEXT ON FIN24X

 
 
 

Read Fin24’s Comments Policy

24.com publishes all comments posted on articles provided that they adhere to our Comments Policy. Should you wish to report a comment for editorial review, please do so by clicking the 'Report Comment' button to the right of each comment.

Comment on this story
0 comments
Add your comment
Comment 0 characters remaining
 

Company Snapshot

We're talking about:

Small Business

“Hippie sense makes business sense,” an entrepreneur said, adding that "purpose" was core to success.
 

Money Clinic

Money Clinic
Do you have a question about your finances? We'll get an expert opinion.
Click here...
Loading...