Obama’s budget to target rich
Washington - President Barack Obama will argue for tax increases on the
wealthy and new spending on roads and other infrastructure projects, as he lays
out a campaign-year budget on Monday that will draw a populist battle line with
his Republicans opponents.
the fourth year in a row, the annual US budget deficit is expected to exceed
$1 trillion but the White House will project an easing of the shortfall next
year in the fiscal 2013 budget Obama will unveil at 16:15 GMT.
vulnerable over the weak economy as he campaigns for re-election in November,
will call for deferring major deficit cuts until the economic recovery is
securely back on track and will outline steps to decrease it over time.
think there is pretty broad agreement that the time for austerity is not
today,” White House chief of staff Jack Lew told NBC’s Meet the Press on
in control of the House of Representatives, have already declared the budget a
non-starter and plan to seize on it to try to paint the president as a
tax-and-spend liberal. They warn that tax hikes will kill jobs while doing
nothing to halt the climb in the crushing level of national debt.
nation is just drowning in red ink,” said Representative Jeb Hensarling, a
Republican from Texas.
look forward to seeing the details, but I’m afraid it may be more of the same,
and that is: red ink, fewer jobs, less employment, and less opportunity,”
Romney, the frontrunner in the Republican race to challenge Obama in November,
called Obama’s budget an “insult to the American taxpayer”.
announcement of the budget grants Obama one of his biggest platforms before the
November 6 election to lay out his vision for America’s future, casting Republicans
as the party of the rich as he tries to convince voters that he would do more
to protect their interests.
a push for spending on popular programmes like education, Obama will visit a
community college in Virginia to deliver remarks on the budget at 16:00 GMT.
consistently show that even as the economy has demonstrated surprising strength
in recent weeks, Americans are still unsure of Obama’s economic stewardship, a
major problem for him as he seeks to persuade them to give him a second term.
will repeat a demand for millionaires to pay a minimum tax rate of 30%,
the so-called Buffett Rule named after billionaire investor Warren
Buffett. He will also identify $4 trillion in deficit reduction over 10 years
that broadly mirrors a plan he laid out in September.
budget projects a deficit of $901bn in 2013, representing 5.5% of
gross domestic product (GDP), down from $1.33 trillion or 8.5% of GDP this
year, White House officials said.
pledged in 2009 to have cut the deficit in half by the end of his first term,
but his budget does not anticipate getting it back under 3% of GDP until
deficit projections are based on growth forecasts that will be released along
with the rest of the budget at 16:15 GMT.
White House has already declared its budget prediction of an 8.9% 2012
unemployment as “stale”, after an improving labour market lowered unemployment
to 8.3% in January.
say Obama uses gimmicks to massage the deficit numbers, pointing to savings
from winding down wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, which they complain amounts to
counting funds that were never going to be spent.
president will propose using half of the money from ending Americas’ two
foreign wars to subsidise investment in infrastructure as part of his request
for over $800bn in multi-year spending on job creation and
includes tax breaks for companies and individuals that would be worth more than
$300bn in 2012 if passed into law. That could provide additional fiscal
stimulus for economic growth as Obama campaigns around the country for
of the biggest boosts would come from extending a payroll tax cut for 160
million Americans for all of 2012, which expires on February 29 unless Congress
acts. The White House estimates this could add a percentage point to 2012 GDP.
the budget proposes raising $1.5 trillion over a decade through higher taxes,
with around half coming from allowing tax breaks for families earning more than
$250 000 a year to expire at the end of 2012 - a longstanding Obama goal.
So the republicans point fingers at Obama for trying to sort out a mess that they created and he inherited. He got handed a dogs breakfast on a silver platter from previous incompetent republican administrations. mmm who comes to mind, Bill, George, seriously they just made the situation worse.
The republicans with their old white money syndrome should catch a wake up!
Considering that the wealthy in america are currently only required to pay tax at the same rate as the middle class while earning anything up to 400 times more, its time the 1%ers started carrying their own weight, something they have never done. Of course the vote is a hollow thing as the candidates all come from the same upper class level, so irrespective of how the public votes the 1%ers are always guaranteed to have someone they want in power.
actually he should be negotiating incentives to encourage the rich to create more jobs so that more people are employed.
the fact that the rich gets taxed at a higher level will cause four things 1- reluctance to invest by the rich. 2-the increased taxed money look after the unemployed. which inevitably creates a socialist setup and government. 3 the gov will feel obliged to employ the umemployed themselves which will lead to greece. 4. this will bring the world back to this point but ten times worse.
there are other minor things like:
1. you dont work then you dont eat
2. selfworth will be lost because you cant earn.
3. a whole bunch of immature citizenry because of the nanny state.
how absolutely appalling.
the resonable way to survive is to tighten the belt, pull together and work your way out of the hole.
Sorry Brent but those championing Obama and all this entitlement policies aren't even going to begin hearing your argument. Great comment - sums it all up. But when you hear that in America there are now more people who don't pay tax than those who do it doesn't take a rocket scientist to realise who they will vote in next time.
As long as the poor will get sooome relief like here. That would atleast buy them more meaty suppers.
The rich will still impulse another R60,000 Birkin only to forget it exists.